How screening criteria change during brand development

John Saunders*, Veronica Wong, Chris Stagg, Mariadel M.S. Fontan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose - Despite the increasing sophistication of new product development (NPD) research, the reliance on traditional approaches to studying NPD has left several areas in need of further research. The authors propose addressing some of these gaps, especially the limited focus on consumer brands, evaluation criteria used across different project-review points in the NPD process, and the distinction between "kills", "successes", and "failures". Moreover, they propose investigating how screening criteria change across project-review points, using real-time NPD projects. Design/methodology/approach - A postal survey generated 172 usable questionnaires from a sample of European, North American, Far Eastern and Australian consumer packaged-goods firms, providing data on 314 new product projects covering different development and post-commercialization review points. Findings - The results confirm that acceptance-rejection criteria vary through the NPD process. However, financial criteria dominate across all the project-review points. Initial screening is coarse, focusing predominantly on financial criteria. Fit with organizational, product, brand, promotional, and market requirements dominate in the detailed screen and pre-development evaluation points. At pre-launch, decision-makers focus on product, brand, and promotional criteria. Commercial fit, production synergies, and reliability of the firm's market intelligence are significant discriminators in the post-launch review. Moreover, the importance of marketing and channel issues makes the criteria for screening brands different from those of industrial markets. Originality/value - The study, although largely descriptive and involves a relatively small sample of consumer goods firms, offers new insights into NPD project evaluation behavior. Future, larger-scale investigations covering a broader spectrum of consumer product sectors are needed to validate our results and to explain the reasons behind managers' decisions. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239-249
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Product and Brand Management
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2005

Fingerprint

Product development
Screening
Discriminators
Consumer products
Marketing
Managers
New product development
Development projects
New product development process

Keywords

  • brands
  • change management
  • consumer behaviour
  • product development

Cite this

Saunders, John ; Wong, Veronica ; Stagg, Chris ; Fontan, Mariadel M.S. / How screening criteria change during brand development. In: Journal of Product and Brand Management. 2005 ; Vol. 14, No. 4. pp. 239-249.
@article{d2e4ae6cf35449229b032f98bd8557e3,
title = "How screening criteria change during brand development",
abstract = "Purpose - Despite the increasing sophistication of new product development (NPD) research, the reliance on traditional approaches to studying NPD has left several areas in need of further research. The authors propose addressing some of these gaps, especially the limited focus on consumer brands, evaluation criteria used across different project-review points in the NPD process, and the distinction between {"}kills{"}, {"}successes{"}, and {"}failures{"}. Moreover, they propose investigating how screening criteria change across project-review points, using real-time NPD projects. Design/methodology/approach - A postal survey generated 172 usable questionnaires from a sample of European, North American, Far Eastern and Australian consumer packaged-goods firms, providing data on 314 new product projects covering different development and post-commercialization review points. Findings - The results confirm that acceptance-rejection criteria vary through the NPD process. However, financial criteria dominate across all the project-review points. Initial screening is coarse, focusing predominantly on financial criteria. Fit with organizational, product, brand, promotional, and market requirements dominate in the detailed screen and pre-development evaluation points. At pre-launch, decision-makers focus on product, brand, and promotional criteria. Commercial fit, production synergies, and reliability of the firm's market intelligence are significant discriminators in the post-launch review. Moreover, the importance of marketing and channel issues makes the criteria for screening brands different from those of industrial markets. Originality/value - The study, although largely descriptive and involves a relatively small sample of consumer goods firms, offers new insights into NPD project evaluation behavior. Future, larger-scale investigations covering a broader spectrum of consumer product sectors are needed to validate our results and to explain the reasons behind managers' decisions. {\circledC} Emerald Group Publishing Limited.",
keywords = "brands, change management, consumer behaviour, product development",
author = "John Saunders and Veronica Wong and Chris Stagg and Fontan, {Mariadel M.S.}",
year = "2005",
doi = "10.1108/10610420510609249",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "239--249",
journal = "Journal of Product and Brand Management",
issn = "1061-0421",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "4",

}

How screening criteria change during brand development. / Saunders, John; Wong, Veronica; Stagg, Chris; Fontan, Mariadel M.S.

In: Journal of Product and Brand Management, Vol. 14, No. 4, 2005, p. 239-249.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How screening criteria change during brand development

AU - Saunders, John

AU - Wong, Veronica

AU - Stagg, Chris

AU - Fontan, Mariadel M.S.

PY - 2005

Y1 - 2005

N2 - Purpose - Despite the increasing sophistication of new product development (NPD) research, the reliance on traditional approaches to studying NPD has left several areas in need of further research. The authors propose addressing some of these gaps, especially the limited focus on consumer brands, evaluation criteria used across different project-review points in the NPD process, and the distinction between "kills", "successes", and "failures". Moreover, they propose investigating how screening criteria change across project-review points, using real-time NPD projects. Design/methodology/approach - A postal survey generated 172 usable questionnaires from a sample of European, North American, Far Eastern and Australian consumer packaged-goods firms, providing data on 314 new product projects covering different development and post-commercialization review points. Findings - The results confirm that acceptance-rejection criteria vary through the NPD process. However, financial criteria dominate across all the project-review points. Initial screening is coarse, focusing predominantly on financial criteria. Fit with organizational, product, brand, promotional, and market requirements dominate in the detailed screen and pre-development evaluation points. At pre-launch, decision-makers focus on product, brand, and promotional criteria. Commercial fit, production synergies, and reliability of the firm's market intelligence are significant discriminators in the post-launch review. Moreover, the importance of marketing and channel issues makes the criteria for screening brands different from those of industrial markets. Originality/value - The study, although largely descriptive and involves a relatively small sample of consumer goods firms, offers new insights into NPD project evaluation behavior. Future, larger-scale investigations covering a broader spectrum of consumer product sectors are needed to validate our results and to explain the reasons behind managers' decisions. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

AB - Purpose - Despite the increasing sophistication of new product development (NPD) research, the reliance on traditional approaches to studying NPD has left several areas in need of further research. The authors propose addressing some of these gaps, especially the limited focus on consumer brands, evaluation criteria used across different project-review points in the NPD process, and the distinction between "kills", "successes", and "failures". Moreover, they propose investigating how screening criteria change across project-review points, using real-time NPD projects. Design/methodology/approach - A postal survey generated 172 usable questionnaires from a sample of European, North American, Far Eastern and Australian consumer packaged-goods firms, providing data on 314 new product projects covering different development and post-commercialization review points. Findings - The results confirm that acceptance-rejection criteria vary through the NPD process. However, financial criteria dominate across all the project-review points. Initial screening is coarse, focusing predominantly on financial criteria. Fit with organizational, product, brand, promotional, and market requirements dominate in the detailed screen and pre-development evaluation points. At pre-launch, decision-makers focus on product, brand, and promotional criteria. Commercial fit, production synergies, and reliability of the firm's market intelligence are significant discriminators in the post-launch review. Moreover, the importance of marketing and channel issues makes the criteria for screening brands different from those of industrial markets. Originality/value - The study, although largely descriptive and involves a relatively small sample of consumer goods firms, offers new insights into NPD project evaluation behavior. Future, larger-scale investigations covering a broader spectrum of consumer product sectors are needed to validate our results and to explain the reasons behind managers' decisions. © Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

KW - brands

KW - change management

KW - consumer behaviour

KW - product development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=24744468861&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.emeraldinsight.com/journals.htm?articleid=1515075&show=abstract

U2 - 10.1108/10610420510609249

DO - 10.1108/10610420510609249

M3 - Article

VL - 14

SP - 239

EP - 249

JO - Journal of Product and Brand Management

JF - Journal of Product and Brand Management

SN - 1061-0421

IS - 4

ER -