How 'universal' is the United Nations' Universal Periodic Review process? An examination of the discussions held on polygamy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 2006, United Nations Human Rights Council was tasked to establish a new human rights monitoring mechanism: Universal Periodic Review process. The primary aim of this process is to promote and protect the universality of all human rights issues and concerns via a dialogical peer review process. The aim of this investigation isto ask the following question: has this claim of promoting and protecting the universality of the human rights been met, or challenged, during state reviews in the UPR process? The issue of polygamy has been selected as the focus for this investigation to be used, primarily, as a tool to undertake an in-depth analysis of the discussions held during state reviews in the review process. In addition, this paper will employ scholarly debates between universalism and cultural relativism, as well as the sophisticated and nuanced approaches that fall in between the polarised opposites, to analyse the discussions held on human rights during state reviews. Ultimately, the findings and discussion of this investigation will provide a unique and valuable insight to the work and operation of the UPR process, so far.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459–483
Number of pages25
JournalHuman Rights Review
Volume18
Issue number4
Early online date2 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

UNO
human rights
examination
cultural relativism
universalism
peer review
monitoring

Bibliographical note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12142-017-0461-7

Keywords

  • universalism
  • cultural relativism
  • polygamy
  • Universal Periodic Review

Cite this

@article{2e7af673a6a74c26946026e815a0552e,
title = "How 'universal' is the United Nations' Universal Periodic Review process? An examination of the discussions held on polygamy",
abstract = "In 2006, United Nations Human Rights Council was tasked to establish a new human rights monitoring mechanism: Universal Periodic Review process. The primary aim of this process is to promote and protect the universality of all human rights issues and concerns via a dialogical peer review process. The aim of this investigation isto ask the following question: has this claim of promoting and protecting the universality of the human rights been met, or challenged, during state reviews in the UPR process? The issue of polygamy has been selected as the focus for this investigation to be used, primarily, as a tool to undertake an in-depth analysis of the discussions held during state reviews in the review process. In addition, this paper will employ scholarly debates between universalism and cultural relativism, as well as the sophisticated and nuanced approaches that fall in between the polarised opposites, to analyse the discussions held on human rights during state reviews. Ultimately, the findings and discussion of this investigation will provide a unique and valuable insight to the work and operation of the UPR process, so far.",
keywords = "universalism, cultural relativism, polygamy, Universal Periodic Review",
author = "Gayatri Patel",
note = "The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12142-017-0461-7",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s12142-017-0461-7",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "459–483",
number = "4",

}

How 'universal' is the United Nations' Universal Periodic Review process? An examination of the discussions held on polygamy. / Patel, Gayatri.

In: Human Rights Review , Vol. 18, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 459–483.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - How 'universal' is the United Nations' Universal Periodic Review process? An examination of the discussions held on polygamy

AU - Patel, Gayatri

N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12142-017-0461-7

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - In 2006, United Nations Human Rights Council was tasked to establish a new human rights monitoring mechanism: Universal Periodic Review process. The primary aim of this process is to promote and protect the universality of all human rights issues and concerns via a dialogical peer review process. The aim of this investigation isto ask the following question: has this claim of promoting and protecting the universality of the human rights been met, or challenged, during state reviews in the UPR process? The issue of polygamy has been selected as the focus for this investigation to be used, primarily, as a tool to undertake an in-depth analysis of the discussions held during state reviews in the review process. In addition, this paper will employ scholarly debates between universalism and cultural relativism, as well as the sophisticated and nuanced approaches that fall in between the polarised opposites, to analyse the discussions held on human rights during state reviews. Ultimately, the findings and discussion of this investigation will provide a unique and valuable insight to the work and operation of the UPR process, so far.

AB - In 2006, United Nations Human Rights Council was tasked to establish a new human rights monitoring mechanism: Universal Periodic Review process. The primary aim of this process is to promote and protect the universality of all human rights issues and concerns via a dialogical peer review process. The aim of this investigation isto ask the following question: has this claim of promoting and protecting the universality of the human rights been met, or challenged, during state reviews in the UPR process? The issue of polygamy has been selected as the focus for this investigation to be used, primarily, as a tool to undertake an in-depth analysis of the discussions held during state reviews in the review process. In addition, this paper will employ scholarly debates between universalism and cultural relativism, as well as the sophisticated and nuanced approaches that fall in between the polarised opposites, to analyse the discussions held on human rights during state reviews. Ultimately, the findings and discussion of this investigation will provide a unique and valuable insight to the work and operation of the UPR process, so far.

KW - universalism

KW - cultural relativism

KW - polygamy

KW - Universal Periodic Review

UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12142-017-0461-7

U2 - 10.1007/s12142-017-0461-7

DO - 10.1007/s12142-017-0461-7

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 459

EP - 483

IS - 4

ER -