How 'universal' is the United Nations' Universal Periodic Review process? An examination of the discussions held on polygamy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In 2006, United Nations Human Rights Council was tasked to establish a new human rights monitoring mechanism: Universal Periodic Review process. The primary aim of this process is to promote and protect the universality of all human rights issues and concerns via a dialogical peer review process. The aim of this investigation isto ask the following question: has this claim of promoting and protecting the universality of the human rights been met, or challenged, during state reviews in the UPR process? The issue of polygamy has been selected as the focus for this investigation to be used, primarily, as a tool to undertake an in-depth analysis of the discussions held during state reviews in the review process. In addition, this paper will employ scholarly debates between universalism and cultural relativism, as well as the sophisticated and nuanced approaches that fall in between the polarised opposites, to analyse the discussions held on human rights during state reviews. Ultimately, the findings and discussion of this investigation will provide a unique and valuable insight to the work and operation of the UPR process, so far.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)459–483
Number of pages25
JournalHuman Rights Review
Volume18
Issue number4
Early online date2 Aug 2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2017

Bibliographical note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12142-017-0461-7

Keywords

  • universalism
  • cultural relativism
  • polygamy
  • Universal Periodic Review

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'How 'universal' is the United Nations' Universal Periodic Review process? An examination of the discussions held on polygamy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Profiles

    No photo of Gayatri Patel

    Gayatri Patel

    Person: Academic

    Cite this