Identifying frames: a comparison of research methods

Frida Boräng, Rainer Eising, Heike Klüver, Christine Mahoney, Daniel Naurin, Daniel Rasch, Patrycja Rozbicka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Framing plays an important role in public policy. Interest groups strategically highlight some aspects of a policy proposal while downplaying others in order to steer the policy debate in a favorable direction. Despite the importance of framing, we still know relatively little about the framing strategies of interest groups due to methodological difficulties that have prevented scholars from systematically studying interest group framing across a large number of interest groups and multiple policy debates. This article therefore provides an overview of three novel research methods that allow researchers to systematically measure interest group frames. More specifically, this article introduces a word-based quantitative text analysis technique, a manual, computer-assisted content analysis approach and face-to-face interviews designed to systematically identify interest group frames. The results generated by all three techniques are compared on the basis of a case study of interest group framing in an environmental policy debate in the European Union.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)188-201
Number of pages14
JournalInterest Groups and Advocacy
Volume3
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2014

Fingerprint

interest group
research method
text analysis
environmental policy
content analysis
public policy
interview

Cite this

Boräng, F., Eising, R., Klüver, H., Mahoney, C., Naurin, D., Rasch, D., & Rozbicka, P. (2014). Identifying frames: a comparison of research methods. Interest Groups and Advocacy, 3(2), 188-201. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.12
Boräng, Frida ; Eising, Rainer ; Klüver, Heike ; Mahoney, Christine ; Naurin, Daniel ; Rasch, Daniel ; Rozbicka, Patrycja. / Identifying frames : a comparison of research methods. In: Interest Groups and Advocacy. 2014 ; Vol. 3, No. 2. pp. 188-201.
@article{ed8413e8f799420daeac6cb8e7cb3f1b,
title = "Identifying frames: a comparison of research methods",
abstract = "Framing plays an important role in public policy. Interest groups strategically highlight some aspects of a policy proposal while downplaying others in order to steer the policy debate in a favorable direction. Despite the importance of framing, we still know relatively little about the framing strategies of interest groups due to methodological difficulties that have prevented scholars from systematically studying interest group framing across a large number of interest groups and multiple policy debates. This article therefore provides an overview of three novel research methods that allow researchers to systematically measure interest group frames. More specifically, this article introduces a word-based quantitative text analysis technique, a manual, computer-assisted content analysis approach and face-to-face interviews designed to systematically identify interest group frames. The results generated by all three techniques are compared on the basis of a case study of interest group framing in an environmental policy debate in the European Union.",
author = "Frida Bor{\"a}ng and Rainer Eising and Heike Kl{\"u}ver and Christine Mahoney and Daniel Naurin and Daniel Rasch and Patrycja Rozbicka",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1057/iga.2014.12",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "188--201",
journal = "Interest Groups and Advocacy",
issn = "2047-7414",
publisher = "Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.",
number = "2",

}

Boräng, F, Eising, R, Klüver, H, Mahoney, C, Naurin, D, Rasch, D & Rozbicka, P 2014, 'Identifying frames: a comparison of research methods', Interest Groups and Advocacy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 188-201. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.12

Identifying frames : a comparison of research methods. / Boräng, Frida; Eising, Rainer; Klüver, Heike; Mahoney, Christine; Naurin, Daniel; Rasch, Daniel; Rozbicka, Patrycja.

In: Interest Groups and Advocacy, Vol. 3, No. 2, 30.06.2014, p. 188-201.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Identifying frames

T2 - a comparison of research methods

AU - Boräng, Frida

AU - Eising, Rainer

AU - Klüver, Heike

AU - Mahoney, Christine

AU - Naurin, Daniel

AU - Rasch, Daniel

AU - Rozbicka, Patrycja

PY - 2014/6/30

Y1 - 2014/6/30

N2 - Framing plays an important role in public policy. Interest groups strategically highlight some aspects of a policy proposal while downplaying others in order to steer the policy debate in a favorable direction. Despite the importance of framing, we still know relatively little about the framing strategies of interest groups due to methodological difficulties that have prevented scholars from systematically studying interest group framing across a large number of interest groups and multiple policy debates. This article therefore provides an overview of three novel research methods that allow researchers to systematically measure interest group frames. More specifically, this article introduces a word-based quantitative text analysis technique, a manual, computer-assisted content analysis approach and face-to-face interviews designed to systematically identify interest group frames. The results generated by all three techniques are compared on the basis of a case study of interest group framing in an environmental policy debate in the European Union.

AB - Framing plays an important role in public policy. Interest groups strategically highlight some aspects of a policy proposal while downplaying others in order to steer the policy debate in a favorable direction. Despite the importance of framing, we still know relatively little about the framing strategies of interest groups due to methodological difficulties that have prevented scholars from systematically studying interest group framing across a large number of interest groups and multiple policy debates. This article therefore provides an overview of three novel research methods that allow researchers to systematically measure interest group frames. More specifically, this article introduces a word-based quantitative text analysis technique, a manual, computer-assisted content analysis approach and face-to-face interviews designed to systematically identify interest group frames. The results generated by all three techniques are compared on the basis of a case study of interest group framing in an environmental policy debate in the European Union.

UR - http://www.palgrave-journals.com/iga/journal/v3/n2/full/iga201412a.html

U2 - 10.1057/iga.2014.12

DO - 10.1057/iga.2014.12

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 188

EP - 201

JO - Interest Groups and Advocacy

JF - Interest Groups and Advocacy

SN - 2047-7414

IS - 2

ER -

Boräng F, Eising R, Klüver H, Mahoney C, Naurin D, Rasch D et al. Identifying frames: a comparison of research methods. Interest Groups and Advocacy. 2014 Jun 30;3(2):188-201. https://doi.org/10.1057/iga.2014.12