Impaired balance in developmental dyslexia? A meta-analysis of the contending evidence

Kim S. H. Rochelle, Joel B. Talcott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Developmental dyslexia is typically defined by deficits in phonological skills, but it is also associated with anomalous performance on measures of balance. Although balance assessments are included in several screening batteries for dyslexia, the association between impairments in literacy and deficits in postural stability could be due to the high co-occurrence of dyslexia with other developmental disorders in which impairments of motor behaviour are also prevalent. Methods: We identified 17 published studies that compared balance function between dyslexia and control samples and obtained effect-sizes for each. Contrast and association analyses were used to quantify the influence of hypothesised moderator variables on differences in effects across studies. Results: The mean effect-size of the balance deficit in dyslexia was .64 (95% CI = .44-.78) with heterogeneous findings across the population of studies. Probable co-occurrence of other developmental disorders and variability in intelligence scores in the dyslexia samples were the strongest moderator variables of effect-size. Conclusions: Balance deficits are associated with dyslexia, but these effects are apparently more strongly related to third variables other than to reading ability. Deficits of balance may indicate increased risk of developmental disorder, but are unlikely to be uniquely associated with dyslexia.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1159-1166
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Volume47
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2006

Keywords

  • meta-analysis
  • dyslexia
  • attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
  • balance
  • postural stability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impaired balance in developmental dyslexia? A meta-analysis of the contending evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this