Improper use of formative endogenous variables

John W. Cadogan, Nick Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Researchers often develop and test conceptual models containing formative variables. In many cases, these formative variables are specified as being endogenous. This article provides a clarification of formative variable theory, distinguishing between the formative latent variable and the formative composite variable. When an endogenous latent variable relies on formative indicators for measurement, empirical studies can say nothing about the relationship between exogenous variables and the endogenous formative latent variable: conclusions can only be drawn regarding the exogenous variables' relationships with a composite variable. The authors also show the dangers associated with developing theory about antecedents to endogenous formative variables at the (aggregate) formative latent variable level. Modeling relationships with endogenous formative variables at the (disaggregate) indicator level informs richer theory development, and encourages more precise empirical testing. When antecedents' relationships with endogenous formative variables are modeled at the formative latent variable level rather than the formative indicator level, theory construction can verge on the superficial, and empirical findings can be ambiguous in substantive meaning.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-241
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Business Research
Volume66
Issue number2
Early online date23 Aug 2012
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2013

Fingerprint

Endogenous variables
Latent variables
Exogenous variables
Conceptual model
Testing
Theory development
Empirical study
Modeling
Theory construction

Keywords

  • conceptual models
  • formative latent variables
  • composite variables
  • measurement
  • theory development
  • partial least squares

Cite this

Cadogan, John W. ; Lee, Nick. / Improper use of formative endogenous variables. In: Journal of Business Research. 2013 ; Vol. 66, No. 2. pp. 233-241.
@article{556cedc4c9964729ad3cbf6195e1f77d,
title = "Improper use of formative endogenous variables",
abstract = "Researchers often develop and test conceptual models containing formative variables. In many cases, these formative variables are specified as being endogenous. This article provides a clarification of formative variable theory, distinguishing between the formative latent variable and the formative composite variable. When an endogenous latent variable relies on formative indicators for measurement, empirical studies can say nothing about the relationship between exogenous variables and the endogenous formative latent variable: conclusions can only be drawn regarding the exogenous variables' relationships with a composite variable. The authors also show the dangers associated with developing theory about antecedents to endogenous formative variables at the (aggregate) formative latent variable level. Modeling relationships with endogenous formative variables at the (disaggregate) indicator level informs richer theory development, and encourages more precise empirical testing. When antecedents' relationships with endogenous formative variables are modeled at the formative latent variable level rather than the formative indicator level, theory construction can verge on the superficial, and empirical findings can be ambiguous in substantive meaning.",
keywords = "conceptual models, formative latent variables, composite variables, measurement, theory development, partial least squares",
author = "Cadogan, {John W.} and Nick Lee",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.006",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
pages = "233--241",
journal = "Journal of Business Research",
issn = "0148-2963",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Improper use of formative endogenous variables. / Cadogan, John W.; Lee, Nick.

In: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 66, No. 2, 02.2013, p. 233-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improper use of formative endogenous variables

AU - Cadogan, John W.

AU - Lee, Nick

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Researchers often develop and test conceptual models containing formative variables. In many cases, these formative variables are specified as being endogenous. This article provides a clarification of formative variable theory, distinguishing between the formative latent variable and the formative composite variable. When an endogenous latent variable relies on formative indicators for measurement, empirical studies can say nothing about the relationship between exogenous variables and the endogenous formative latent variable: conclusions can only be drawn regarding the exogenous variables' relationships with a composite variable. The authors also show the dangers associated with developing theory about antecedents to endogenous formative variables at the (aggregate) formative latent variable level. Modeling relationships with endogenous formative variables at the (disaggregate) indicator level informs richer theory development, and encourages more precise empirical testing. When antecedents' relationships with endogenous formative variables are modeled at the formative latent variable level rather than the formative indicator level, theory construction can verge on the superficial, and empirical findings can be ambiguous in substantive meaning.

AB - Researchers often develop and test conceptual models containing formative variables. In many cases, these formative variables are specified as being endogenous. This article provides a clarification of formative variable theory, distinguishing between the formative latent variable and the formative composite variable. When an endogenous latent variable relies on formative indicators for measurement, empirical studies can say nothing about the relationship between exogenous variables and the endogenous formative latent variable: conclusions can only be drawn regarding the exogenous variables' relationships with a composite variable. The authors also show the dangers associated with developing theory about antecedents to endogenous formative variables at the (aggregate) formative latent variable level. Modeling relationships with endogenous formative variables at the (disaggregate) indicator level informs richer theory development, and encourages more precise empirical testing. When antecedents' relationships with endogenous formative variables are modeled at the formative latent variable level rather than the formative indicator level, theory construction can verge on the superficial, and empirical findings can be ambiguous in substantive meaning.

KW - conceptual models

KW - formative latent variables

KW - composite variables

KW - measurement

KW - theory development

KW - partial least squares

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870573274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296312002196?via%3Dihub

U2 - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.006

M3 - Article

VL - 66

SP - 233

EP - 241

JO - Journal of Business Research

JF - Journal of Business Research

SN - 0148-2963

IS - 2

ER -