Industrial policy, FDI and employment: Still 'missing a strategy'

David Bailey*, Nigel Driffield

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper contrasts the effects of trade, inward FDI and technological development upon the demand for skilled and unskilled workers in the UK. By focussing on industry level data panel data on smaller firms, the paper also contrasts these effects with those generated by large scale domestic investment. The analysis is placed within the broader context of shifts in British industrial policy, which has seen significant shifts from sectoral to horizontal measures and towards stressing the importance of SMEs, clusters and new technology, all delivered at the regional scale. This, however, is contrasted with continued elements of British and EU regional policy which have emphasised the attraction of inward investment in order to alleviate regional unemployment. The results suggest that such policies are not naturally compatible; that while both trade and FDI benefit skilled workers, they have adverse effects on the demand for unskilled labour in the UK. At the very least this suggests the need for a range of policies to tackle various targets (including in this case unemployment and social inclusion) and the need to integrate these into a coherent industrial strategy at various levels of governance, whether regional and/or national. This has important implications for the form of any 'new' industrial policy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-211
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Industry, Competition and Trade
Volume7
Issue number3-4
Early online date26 Dec 2006
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2007

Fingerprint

Industrial policy
Governance
Unemployment
Skilled workers
Industry
Social inclusion
Attraction
Regional unemployment
Unskilled labour
Panel data
Regional policy
Small and medium-sized enterprises
Small firms
Domestic investment
Workers
Technological development

Bibliographical note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-7185-8

Funding: ESRC (RES-000-22-0468)

Keywords

  • employment
  • FDI
  • industrial policy
  • regional policy

Cite this

Bailey, David ; Driffield, Nigel. / Industrial policy, FDI and employment : Still 'missing a strategy'. In: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade. 2007 ; Vol. 7, No. 3-4. pp. 189-211.
@article{134c0183ec144751ac132aa344796e7f,
title = "Industrial policy, FDI and employment: Still 'missing a strategy'",
abstract = "This paper contrasts the effects of trade, inward FDI and technological development upon the demand for skilled and unskilled workers in the UK. By focussing on industry level data panel data on smaller firms, the paper also contrasts these effects with those generated by large scale domestic investment. The analysis is placed within the broader context of shifts in British industrial policy, which has seen significant shifts from sectoral to horizontal measures and towards stressing the importance of SMEs, clusters and new technology, all delivered at the regional scale. This, however, is contrasted with continued elements of British and EU regional policy which have emphasised the attraction of inward investment in order to alleviate regional unemployment. The results suggest that such policies are not naturally compatible; that while both trade and FDI benefit skilled workers, they have adverse effects on the demand for unskilled labour in the UK. At the very least this suggests the need for a range of policies to tackle various targets (including in this case unemployment and social inclusion) and the need to integrate these into a coherent industrial strategy at various levels of governance, whether regional and/or national. This has important implications for the form of any 'new' industrial policy.",
keywords = "employment, FDI, industrial policy, regional policy",
author = "David Bailey and Nigel Driffield",
note = "The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-7185-8 Funding: ESRC (RES-000-22-0468)",
year = "2007",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1007/s10842-006-7185-8",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "189--211",
journal = "Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade",
issn = "1566-1679",
publisher = "Kluwer",
number = "3-4",

}

Industrial policy, FDI and employment : Still 'missing a strategy'. / Bailey, David; Driffield, Nigel.

In: Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Vol. 7, No. 3-4, 12.2007, p. 189-211.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Industrial policy, FDI and employment

T2 - Still 'missing a strategy'

AU - Bailey, David

AU - Driffield, Nigel

N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10842-006-7185-8 Funding: ESRC (RES-000-22-0468)

PY - 2007/12

Y1 - 2007/12

N2 - This paper contrasts the effects of trade, inward FDI and technological development upon the demand for skilled and unskilled workers in the UK. By focussing on industry level data panel data on smaller firms, the paper also contrasts these effects with those generated by large scale domestic investment. The analysis is placed within the broader context of shifts in British industrial policy, which has seen significant shifts from sectoral to horizontal measures and towards stressing the importance of SMEs, clusters and new technology, all delivered at the regional scale. This, however, is contrasted with continued elements of British and EU regional policy which have emphasised the attraction of inward investment in order to alleviate regional unemployment. The results suggest that such policies are not naturally compatible; that while both trade and FDI benefit skilled workers, they have adverse effects on the demand for unskilled labour in the UK. At the very least this suggests the need for a range of policies to tackle various targets (including in this case unemployment and social inclusion) and the need to integrate these into a coherent industrial strategy at various levels of governance, whether regional and/or national. This has important implications for the form of any 'new' industrial policy.

AB - This paper contrasts the effects of trade, inward FDI and technological development upon the demand for skilled and unskilled workers in the UK. By focussing on industry level data panel data on smaller firms, the paper also contrasts these effects with those generated by large scale domestic investment. The analysis is placed within the broader context of shifts in British industrial policy, which has seen significant shifts from sectoral to horizontal measures and towards stressing the importance of SMEs, clusters and new technology, all delivered at the regional scale. This, however, is contrasted with continued elements of British and EU regional policy which have emphasised the attraction of inward investment in order to alleviate regional unemployment. The results suggest that such policies are not naturally compatible; that while both trade and FDI benefit skilled workers, they have adverse effects on the demand for unskilled labour in the UK. At the very least this suggests the need for a range of policies to tackle various targets (including in this case unemployment and social inclusion) and the need to integrate these into a coherent industrial strategy at various levels of governance, whether regional and/or national. This has important implications for the form of any 'new' industrial policy.

KW - employment

KW - FDI

KW - industrial policy

KW - regional policy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34548511331&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10842-006-7185-8

DO - 10.1007/s10842-006-7185-8

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34548511331

VL - 7

SP - 189

EP - 211

JO - Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade

JF - Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade

SN - 1566-1679

IS - 3-4

ER -