Ingroup and outgroup minorities: differential impact upon public and private responses

Robin Martin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The experiment which is presented in this paper was designed to overcome some of the problems associated with previous research investigating the effects of social categorization and minority influence. Sixty-eight fourteen-year-old British Secondary School pupils indicated their attitudes towards a 'grant for pupils' before and after reading a text which advocated a minority position. The text was attributed as being the work of either pupils from their own school (ingroup minority) or from a school they discriminated against (outgroup minority). Responses were either made in ‘public’ (by telling subjects that other pupils would see their responses) or in ‘private’ (by subjects putting their responses into a ‘ballot box’). The results showed that on public responses ingroup minorities had more influence than outgroup minorities while there was no difference on private responses. Also, greater change occurred when responses were made in private than in public. These results are compatible with the intergroup analysis of minority influence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)39-52
Number of pages14
JournalEuropean Journal of Social Psychology
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 1988

Fingerprint

Pupil
Organized Financing
Reading
Research

Cite this

@article{49ed3b2fdc4f4ff38a129957e8d3ae46,
title = "Ingroup and outgroup minorities: differential impact upon public and private responses",
abstract = "The experiment which is presented in this paper was designed to overcome some of the problems associated with previous research investigating the effects of social categorization and minority influence. Sixty-eight fourteen-year-old British Secondary School pupils indicated their attitudes towards a 'grant for pupils' before and after reading a text which advocated a minority position. The text was attributed as being the work of either pupils from their own school (ingroup minority) or from a school they discriminated against (outgroup minority). Responses were either made in ‘public’ (by telling subjects that other pupils would see their responses) or in ‘private’ (by subjects putting their responses into a ‘ballot box’). The results showed that on public responses ingroup minorities had more influence than outgroup minorities while there was no difference on private responses. Also, greater change occurred when responses were made in private than in public. These results are compatible with the intergroup analysis of minority influence.",
author = "Robin Martin",
year = "1988",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1002/ejsp.2420180104",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "39--52",
journal = "European Journal of Social Psychology",
issn = "0046-2772",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "1",

}

Ingroup and outgroup minorities : differential impact upon public and private responses. / Martin, Robin.

In: European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 01.1988, p. 39-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ingroup and outgroup minorities

T2 - differential impact upon public and private responses

AU - Martin, Robin

PY - 1988/1

Y1 - 1988/1

N2 - The experiment which is presented in this paper was designed to overcome some of the problems associated with previous research investigating the effects of social categorization and minority influence. Sixty-eight fourteen-year-old British Secondary School pupils indicated their attitudes towards a 'grant for pupils' before and after reading a text which advocated a minority position. The text was attributed as being the work of either pupils from their own school (ingroup minority) or from a school they discriminated against (outgroup minority). Responses were either made in ‘public’ (by telling subjects that other pupils would see their responses) or in ‘private’ (by subjects putting their responses into a ‘ballot box’). The results showed that on public responses ingroup minorities had more influence than outgroup minorities while there was no difference on private responses. Also, greater change occurred when responses were made in private than in public. These results are compatible with the intergroup analysis of minority influence.

AB - The experiment which is presented in this paper was designed to overcome some of the problems associated with previous research investigating the effects of social categorization and minority influence. Sixty-eight fourteen-year-old British Secondary School pupils indicated their attitudes towards a 'grant for pupils' before and after reading a text which advocated a minority position. The text was attributed as being the work of either pupils from their own school (ingroup minority) or from a school they discriminated against (outgroup minority). Responses were either made in ‘public’ (by telling subjects that other pupils would see their responses) or in ‘private’ (by subjects putting their responses into a ‘ballot box’). The results showed that on public responses ingroup minorities had more influence than outgroup minorities while there was no difference on private responses. Also, greater change occurred when responses were made in private than in public. These results are compatible with the intergroup analysis of minority influence.

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.2420180104/abstract

U2 - 10.1002/ejsp.2420180104

DO - 10.1002/ejsp.2420180104

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 39

EP - 52

JO - European Journal of Social Psychology

JF - European Journal of Social Psychology

SN - 0046-2772

IS - 1

ER -