Innocent but proven guilty: eliciting internalized false confessions using doctored-video evidence

Robert A. Nash, Kimberley A. Wade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

More powerful computers and affordable digital-video equipment means that desktop-video editing is now accessible and popular. In two experiments, we investigated whether seeing fake-video evidence, or simply being told that video evidence exists, could lead people to believe they committed an act they never did. Subjects completed a computerized gambling task, and when they returned later the same day, we falsely accused them of cheating on the task. All of the subjects were told that incriminating video evidence existed, and half were also exposed to a fake video. See-video subjects were more likely to confess without resistance, and to internalize the act than told-video subjects, and see-video subjects tended to confabulate details more often than told-video subjects. We offer a metacognitive-based account of our results.

LanguageEnglish
Pages624-637
Number of pages14
JournalApplied Cognitive Psychology
Volume23
Issue number5
Early online date28 Jul 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Gambling
Equipment and Supplies
Fake

Cite this

@article{c79399fe847f4f4da70a395a4944114d,
title = "Innocent but proven guilty: eliciting internalized false confessions using doctored-video evidence",
abstract = "More powerful computers and affordable digital-video equipment means that desktop-video editing is now accessible and popular. In two experiments, we investigated whether seeing fake-video evidence, or simply being told that video evidence exists, could lead people to believe they committed an act they never did. Subjects completed a computerized gambling task, and when they returned later the same day, we falsely accused them of cheating on the task. All of the subjects were told that incriminating video evidence existed, and half were also exposed to a fake video. See-video subjects were more likely to confess without resistance, and to internalize the act than told-video subjects, and see-video subjects tended to confabulate details more often than told-video subjects. We offer a metacognitive-based account of our results.",
author = "Nash, {Robert A.} and Wade, {Kimberley A.}",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
doi = "10.1002/acp.1500",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "624--637",
journal = "Applied Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0888-4080",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Innocent but proven guilty : eliciting internalized false confessions using doctored-video evidence. / Nash, Robert A.; Wade, Kimberley A.

In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 23, No. 5, 07.2009, p. 624-637.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Innocent but proven guilty

T2 - Applied Cognitive Psychology

AU - Nash, Robert A.

AU - Wade, Kimberley A.

PY - 2009/7

Y1 - 2009/7

N2 - More powerful computers and affordable digital-video equipment means that desktop-video editing is now accessible and popular. In two experiments, we investigated whether seeing fake-video evidence, or simply being told that video evidence exists, could lead people to believe they committed an act they never did. Subjects completed a computerized gambling task, and when they returned later the same day, we falsely accused them of cheating on the task. All of the subjects were told that incriminating video evidence existed, and half were also exposed to a fake video. See-video subjects were more likely to confess without resistance, and to internalize the act than told-video subjects, and see-video subjects tended to confabulate details more often than told-video subjects. We offer a metacognitive-based account of our results.

AB - More powerful computers and affordable digital-video equipment means that desktop-video editing is now accessible and popular. In two experiments, we investigated whether seeing fake-video evidence, or simply being told that video evidence exists, could lead people to believe they committed an act they never did. Subjects completed a computerized gambling task, and when they returned later the same day, we falsely accused them of cheating on the task. All of the subjects were told that incriminating video evidence existed, and half were also exposed to a fake video. See-video subjects were more likely to confess without resistance, and to internalize the act than told-video subjects, and see-video subjects tended to confabulate details more often than told-video subjects. We offer a metacognitive-based account of our results.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67649578896&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.1500/abstract

U2 - 10.1002/acp.1500

DO - 10.1002/acp.1500

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 624

EP - 637

JO - Applied Cognitive Psychology

JF - Applied Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0888-4080

IS - 5

ER -