Institutions and social entrepreneurship: the role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations

Ute Stephan*, Lorraine M. Uhlaner, Chris B. Stride

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We develop the institutional configuration perspective to understand which national contexts facilitate social entrepreneurship (SE). We confirm joint effects on SE of formal regulatory (government activism), informal cognitive (postmaterialist cultural values), and informal normative (socially supportive cultural norms, or weak-tie social capital) institutions in a multilevel study of 106,484 individuals in 26 nations. We test opposing propositions from the institutional void and institutional support perspectives. Our results underscore the importance of resource support from both formal and informal institutions, and highlight motivational supply side influences on SE. They advocate greater consideration of institutional configurations in institutional theory and comparative entrepreneurship research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)308-331
Number of pages24
JournalJournal of International Business Studies
Volume46
Issue number3
Early online date31 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Bibliographical note

Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License

Ute Stephan gratefully acknowledges financial support from the European Commission, Socioeconomic Sciences and Humanities Grant Agreement 613500 (Seforїs project).

Keywords

  • comparative entrepreneurship
  • cultural values
  • institutional theory
  • institutional void
  • social capital
  • social entrepreneurship

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Institutions and social entrepreneurship: the role of institutional voids, institutional support, and institutional configurations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this