TY - GEN
T1 - Integration of Interpolation and Inference with Multi-antecedent Rules
AU - Naik, Nitin
AU - Shen, Qiang
N1 - © Springer Nature B.V. 2019. The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29933-0_32
PY - 2019/8/30
Y1 - 2019/8/30
N2 - The efficacious fuzzy rule based systems perform their tasks with either a dense rule base or a sparse rule base. The nature of the rule base decides on whether compositional rule of inference (CRI) or fuzzy rule interpolation (FRI) should be applied. Given a dense rule base where at least one rule exists for every observation, CRI can be effectively and sufficiently employed. For a sparse rule base where rules do not cover all possible observations, FRI is required. Nonetheless, certain observations may be matched partly or completely with any of the existing rules in the sparse rule-base. Such observations can be directly dealt with using CRI and the conclusion can be inferred via firing the matched rule, thereby avoiding extra overheads of interpolation. If no such matching can be found then correct rules should be selected to ensure the accuracy while performing FRI. This paper proposes a generalised approach for the integration of FRI and CRI. It utilises the notion of alpha-cut overlapping to determine the matching degree between rule antecedents and a given observation in order to determine if CRI is to be applied. In the event of no matching rules, the nearest rules will be chosen to derive conclusion using FRI based on the best suitable distance metric among possible alternatives such as the Centre of Gravity, Hausdorff Distance and Earth Mover’s Distance. Comparative results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of this integrated approach.
AB - The efficacious fuzzy rule based systems perform their tasks with either a dense rule base or a sparse rule base. The nature of the rule base decides on whether compositional rule of inference (CRI) or fuzzy rule interpolation (FRI) should be applied. Given a dense rule base where at least one rule exists for every observation, CRI can be effectively and sufficiently employed. For a sparse rule base where rules do not cover all possible observations, FRI is required. Nonetheless, certain observations may be matched partly or completely with any of the existing rules in the sparse rule-base. Such observations can be directly dealt with using CRI and the conclusion can be inferred via firing the matched rule, thereby avoiding extra overheads of interpolation. If no such matching can be found then correct rules should be selected to ensure the accuracy while performing FRI. This paper proposes a generalised approach for the integration of FRI and CRI. It utilises the notion of alpha-cut overlapping to determine the matching degree between rule antecedents and a given observation in order to determine if CRI is to be applied. In the event of no matching rules, the nearest rules will be chosen to derive conclusion using FRI based on the best suitable distance metric among possible alternatives such as the Centre of Gravity, Hausdorff Distance and Earth Mover’s Distance. Comparative results are presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of this integrated approach.
KW - Computational rule of inference
KW - Integration of interpolation and inference
KW - Multi-antecedent rules
KW - Rule extrapolation
KW - Rule interpolation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85072861426&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-030-29933-0_32
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-030-29933-0_32
DO - 10.1007/978-3-030-29933-0_32
M3 - Conference publication
AN - SCOPUS:85072861426
SN - 9783030299323
T3 - Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing
SP - 377
EP - 391
BT - Advances in Computational Intelligence Systems - Contributions Presented at the 19th UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence, 2019
PB - Springer
T2 - 19th Annual UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence, UKCI 2019
Y2 - 4 September 2019 through 6 September 2019
ER -