Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework

Patrycja Rozbicka, Florian Spohr

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Although interests inhabit a central place in the multiple streams framework (MSF), interest groups have played only a minor role in theoretical and empirical studies until now. In Kingdon’s original conception, organized interests are a key variable in the politics stream. Revisiting Kingdon’s concept with a particular focus on interest groups and their activities—in different streams and at various levels—in the policy process, we take this argument further. In particular, we argue that specifying groups’ roles in other streams adds value to the explanatory power of the framework. To do this, we look at how interest groups affect problems, policies, and politics. The influence of interest groups within the streams is explained by linking the MSF with literature on interest intermediation. We show that depending on the number of conditions and their activity level, interest groups can be involved in all three streams. We illustrate this in case studies reviewing labor market policies in Germany and chemicals regulation at the European level.

LanguageEnglish
Pages55-69
Number of pages15
JournalPolicy Sciences
Volume49
Issue number1
Early online date18 Aug 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2016

Fingerprint

interest group
representation of interests
politics
labor market
regulation
Group
policy

Bibliographical note

The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8

Keywords

  • chemicals regulation
  • European Union
  • Germany
  • interest groups
  • labor market
  • multiple streams

Cite this

@article{4657d3e5e62a4e51908e4c93685228b3,
title = "Interest groups in multiple streams: specifying their involvement in the framework",
abstract = "Although interests inhabit a central place in the multiple streams framework (MSF), interest groups have played only a minor role in theoretical and empirical studies until now. In Kingdon’s original conception, organized interests are a key variable in the politics stream. Revisiting Kingdon’s concept with a particular focus on interest groups and their activities—in different streams and at various levels—in the policy process, we take this argument further. In particular, we argue that specifying groups’ roles in other streams adds value to the explanatory power of the framework. To do this, we look at how interest groups affect problems, policies, and politics. The influence of interest groups within the streams is explained by linking the MSF with literature on interest intermediation. We show that depending on the number of conditions and their activity level, interest groups can be involved in all three streams. We illustrate this in case studies reviewing labor market policies in Germany and chemicals regulation at the European level.",
keywords = "chemicals regulation, European Union, Germany, interest groups, labor market, multiple streams",
author = "Patrycja Rozbicka and Florian Spohr",
note = "The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8",
year = "2016",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "55--69",
number = "1",

}

Interest groups in multiple streams : specifying their involvement in the framework. / Rozbicka, Patrycja; Spohr, Florian.

Vol. 49, No. 1, 01.03.2016, p. 55-69.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Interest groups in multiple streams

T2 - specifying their involvement in the framework

AU - Rozbicka, Patrycja

AU - Spohr, Florian

N1 - The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8

PY - 2016/3/1

Y1 - 2016/3/1

N2 - Although interests inhabit a central place in the multiple streams framework (MSF), interest groups have played only a minor role in theoretical and empirical studies until now. In Kingdon’s original conception, organized interests are a key variable in the politics stream. Revisiting Kingdon’s concept with a particular focus on interest groups and their activities—in different streams and at various levels—in the policy process, we take this argument further. In particular, we argue that specifying groups’ roles in other streams adds value to the explanatory power of the framework. To do this, we look at how interest groups affect problems, policies, and politics. The influence of interest groups within the streams is explained by linking the MSF with literature on interest intermediation. We show that depending on the number of conditions and their activity level, interest groups can be involved in all three streams. We illustrate this in case studies reviewing labor market policies in Germany and chemicals regulation at the European level.

AB - Although interests inhabit a central place in the multiple streams framework (MSF), interest groups have played only a minor role in theoretical and empirical studies until now. In Kingdon’s original conception, organized interests are a key variable in the politics stream. Revisiting Kingdon’s concept with a particular focus on interest groups and their activities—in different streams and at various levels—in the policy process, we take this argument further. In particular, we argue that specifying groups’ roles in other streams adds value to the explanatory power of the framework. To do this, we look at how interest groups affect problems, policies, and politics. The influence of interest groups within the streams is explained by linking the MSF with literature on interest intermediation. We show that depending on the number of conditions and their activity level, interest groups can be involved in all three streams. We illustrate this in case studies reviewing labor market policies in Germany and chemicals regulation at the European level.

KW - chemicals regulation

KW - European Union

KW - Germany

KW - interest groups

KW - labor market

KW - multiple streams

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84958049995&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11077-015-9227-8

U2 - 10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8

DO - 10.1007/s11077-015-9227-8

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 55

EP - 69

IS - 1

ER -