International innovation comparisons: Insight or illusion?

Stephen Roper*, Nola Hewitt-Dundas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Recent developments in statistical methodology have facilitated international innovation comparisons. These, however, inevitably reflect both the industrial structure of the underlying economies, and the innovativeness of firms within each element of the industrial structure. The authors consider the extent to which structural differences between economies can influence international innovation comparisons. The impact of structural differences is considered both in conceptual and in empirical terms, with the aid of data from the first and second Community Innovation Surveys (CIS 1 and CIS 2). Conceptual analysis suggests a very restricted range of scenarios under which structural adjustment will be effective. Empirical results are more reassuring, however, suggesting that, although structural effects are in some cases quite large, they do not significantly distort international innovation relativities. The comparisons do, however, highlight significant inconsistencies between different innovation indicators and suggest policy priorities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-401
Number of pages17
JournalEnvironment and Planning C
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2006

Fingerprint

innovation
industrial structure
economy
structural adjustment
comparison
scenario
firm
methodology
community

Cite this

Roper, Stephen ; Hewitt-Dundas, Nola. / International innovation comparisons : Insight or illusion?. In: Environment and Planning C. 2006 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 385-401.
@article{1d538ab9c6904bb0afa94581d5a8e662,
title = "International innovation comparisons: Insight or illusion?",
abstract = "Recent developments in statistical methodology have facilitated international innovation comparisons. These, however, inevitably reflect both the industrial structure of the underlying economies, and the innovativeness of firms within each element of the industrial structure. The authors consider the extent to which structural differences between economies can influence international innovation comparisons. The impact of structural differences is considered both in conceptual and in empirical terms, with the aid of data from the first and second Community Innovation Surveys (CIS 1 and CIS 2). Conceptual analysis suggests a very restricted range of scenarios under which structural adjustment will be effective. Empirical results are more reassuring, however, suggesting that, although structural effects are in some cases quite large, they do not significantly distort international innovation relativities. The comparisons do, however, highlight significant inconsistencies between different innovation indicators and suggest policy priorities.",
author = "Stephen Roper and Nola Hewitt-Dundas",
year = "2006",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1068/c0452",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "385--401",
journal = "Environment and Planning C",
issn = "0263-774X",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

International innovation comparisons : Insight or illusion? / Roper, Stephen; Hewitt-Dundas, Nola.

In: Environment and Planning C, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.06.2006, p. 385-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - International innovation comparisons

T2 - Insight or illusion?

AU - Roper, Stephen

AU - Hewitt-Dundas, Nola

PY - 2006/6/1

Y1 - 2006/6/1

N2 - Recent developments in statistical methodology have facilitated international innovation comparisons. These, however, inevitably reflect both the industrial structure of the underlying economies, and the innovativeness of firms within each element of the industrial structure. The authors consider the extent to which structural differences between economies can influence international innovation comparisons. The impact of structural differences is considered both in conceptual and in empirical terms, with the aid of data from the first and second Community Innovation Surveys (CIS 1 and CIS 2). Conceptual analysis suggests a very restricted range of scenarios under which structural adjustment will be effective. Empirical results are more reassuring, however, suggesting that, although structural effects are in some cases quite large, they do not significantly distort international innovation relativities. The comparisons do, however, highlight significant inconsistencies between different innovation indicators and suggest policy priorities.

AB - Recent developments in statistical methodology have facilitated international innovation comparisons. These, however, inevitably reflect both the industrial structure of the underlying economies, and the innovativeness of firms within each element of the industrial structure. The authors consider the extent to which structural differences between economies can influence international innovation comparisons. The impact of structural differences is considered both in conceptual and in empirical terms, with the aid of data from the first and second Community Innovation Surveys (CIS 1 and CIS 2). Conceptual analysis suggests a very restricted range of scenarios under which structural adjustment will be effective. Empirical results are more reassuring, however, suggesting that, although structural effects are in some cases quite large, they do not significantly distort international innovation relativities. The comparisons do, however, highlight significant inconsistencies between different innovation indicators and suggest policy priorities.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33745751106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1068/c0452

U2 - 10.1068/c0452

DO - 10.1068/c0452

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33745751106

VL - 24

SP - 385

EP - 401

JO - Environment and Planning C

JF - Environment and Planning C

SN - 0263-774X

IS - 3

ER -