Investigating mental health risk assessment in primary care and the potential role of a structured decision support tool, GRiST

Laura Vail, Ann Adams, Eleanor Gilbert, Alice Nettleingham, Christopher D. Buckingham

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Aim: To explore current risk assessment processes in general practice and Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services, and to consider whether the Galatean Risk and Safety Tool (GRiST) can help support improved patient care.
Background: Much has been written about risk assessment practice in secondary mental health care, but little is known about how it is undertaken at the beginning of patients' care pathways, within general practice and IAPT services.
Methods: Interviews with eight general practice and eight IAPT clinicians from two primary care trusts in the West Midlands, UK, and eight service users from the same region. Interviews explored current practice and participants' views and experiences of mental health risk assessment. Two focus groups were also carried out, one with general practice and one with IAPT clinicians, to review interview findings and to elicit views about GRiST from a demonstration of its functionality. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings Variable approaches to mental health risk assessment were observed. Clinicians were anxious that important risk information was being missed, and risk communication was undermined. Patients felt uninvolved in the process, and both clinicians and patients expressed anxiety about risk assessment skills. Clinicians were positive about the potential for GRiST to provide solutions to these problems.
Conclusions: A more structured and systematic approach to risk assessment in general practice and IAPT services is needed, to ensure important risk information is captured and communicated across the care pathway. GRiST has the functionality to support this aspect of practice.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-67
Number of pages11
JournalMental Health in Family Medicine
Volume9
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Mental Health
General Practice
Safety
Psychology
Interviews
Patient Care
Therapeutics
Focus Groups
Anxiety
Communication
Delivery of Health Care

Keywords

  • GRiST
  • improving access to psychological therapies
  • IAPT
  • mental health
  • primary care
  • risk assessment

Cite this

@article{24931f476c1a41779ca8670caddcfa93,
title = "Investigating mental health risk assessment in primary care and the potential role of a structured decision support tool, GRiST",
abstract = "Aim: To explore current risk assessment processes in general practice and Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services, and to consider whether the Galatean Risk and Safety Tool (GRiST) can help support improved patient care.Background: Much has been written about risk assessment practice in secondary mental health care, but little is known about how it is undertaken at the beginning of patients' care pathways, within general practice and IAPT services.Methods: Interviews with eight general practice and eight IAPT clinicians from two primary care trusts in the West Midlands, UK, and eight service users from the same region. Interviews explored current practice and participants' views and experiences of mental health risk assessment. Two focus groups were also carried out, one with general practice and one with IAPT clinicians, to review interview findings and to elicit views about GRiST from a demonstration of its functionality. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings Variable approaches to mental health risk assessment were observed. Clinicians were anxious that important risk information was being missed, and risk communication was undermined. Patients felt uninvolved in the process, and both clinicians and patients expressed anxiety about risk assessment skills. Clinicians were positive about the potential for GRiST to provide solutions to these problems.Conclusions: A more structured and systematic approach to risk assessment in general practice and IAPT services is needed, to ensure important risk information is captured and communicated across the care pathway. GRiST has the functionality to support this aspect of practice.",
keywords = "GRiST, improving access to psychological therapies , IAPT, mental health, primary care, risk assessment",
author = "Laura Vail and Ann Adams and Eleanor Gilbert and Alice Nettleingham and Buckingham, {Christopher D.}",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "57--67",
journal = "Mental Health in Family Medicine",
issn = "1756-834X",
publisher = "Radcliffe Publishing Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Investigating mental health risk assessment in primary care and the potential role of a structured decision support tool, GRiST. / Vail, Laura; Adams, Ann; Gilbert, Eleanor; Nettleingham, Alice; Buckingham, Christopher D.

In: Mental Health in Family Medicine, Vol. 9, No. 1, 03.2012, p. 57-67.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating mental health risk assessment in primary care and the potential role of a structured decision support tool, GRiST

AU - Vail, Laura

AU - Adams, Ann

AU - Gilbert, Eleanor

AU - Nettleingham, Alice

AU - Buckingham, Christopher D.

PY - 2012/3

Y1 - 2012/3

N2 - Aim: To explore current risk assessment processes in general practice and Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services, and to consider whether the Galatean Risk and Safety Tool (GRiST) can help support improved patient care.Background: Much has been written about risk assessment practice in secondary mental health care, but little is known about how it is undertaken at the beginning of patients' care pathways, within general practice and IAPT services.Methods: Interviews with eight general practice and eight IAPT clinicians from two primary care trusts in the West Midlands, UK, and eight service users from the same region. Interviews explored current practice and participants' views and experiences of mental health risk assessment. Two focus groups were also carried out, one with general practice and one with IAPT clinicians, to review interview findings and to elicit views about GRiST from a demonstration of its functionality. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings Variable approaches to mental health risk assessment were observed. Clinicians were anxious that important risk information was being missed, and risk communication was undermined. Patients felt uninvolved in the process, and both clinicians and patients expressed anxiety about risk assessment skills. Clinicians were positive about the potential for GRiST to provide solutions to these problems.Conclusions: A more structured and systematic approach to risk assessment in general practice and IAPT services is needed, to ensure important risk information is captured and communicated across the care pathway. GRiST has the functionality to support this aspect of practice.

AB - Aim: To explore current risk assessment processes in general practice and Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services, and to consider whether the Galatean Risk and Safety Tool (GRiST) can help support improved patient care.Background: Much has been written about risk assessment practice in secondary mental health care, but little is known about how it is undertaken at the beginning of patients' care pathways, within general practice and IAPT services.Methods: Interviews with eight general practice and eight IAPT clinicians from two primary care trusts in the West Midlands, UK, and eight service users from the same region. Interviews explored current practice and participants' views and experiences of mental health risk assessment. Two focus groups were also carried out, one with general practice and one with IAPT clinicians, to review interview findings and to elicit views about GRiST from a demonstration of its functionality. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Findings Variable approaches to mental health risk assessment were observed. Clinicians were anxious that important risk information was being missed, and risk communication was undermined. Patients felt uninvolved in the process, and both clinicians and patients expressed anxiety about risk assessment skills. Clinicians were positive about the potential for GRiST to provide solutions to these problems.Conclusions: A more structured and systematic approach to risk assessment in general practice and IAPT services is needed, to ensure important risk information is captured and communicated across the care pathway. GRiST has the functionality to support this aspect of practice.

KW - GRiST

KW - improving access to psychological therapies

KW - IAPT

KW - mental health

KW - primary care

KW - risk assessment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865209098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 57

EP - 67

JO - Mental Health in Family Medicine

JF - Mental Health in Family Medicine

SN - 1756-834X

IS - 1

ER -