Is a Dominant Service-Centric Sector Good for Diversity of Provision?

J. Hutchinson, Peter Sawyer, J. Walkerdine

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

An obvious assumption underpinning the immense interest in service-oriented computing is that it is an inherently Good Thing, by which we mean that robust processes and tools for developing service-based systems will bring benefits for service providers and service consumers. The arguments, in terms of consumer choice and flexibility, are certainly quite convincing. However, in this position paper, we question the nature of the underlying assumption, in a world where requirements are as many and varied as potential users and ask if safeguards are needed to ensure that diversity of provision is maintained.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSOCCER '06 Proceedings of the Service-Oriented Computing: Consequences for Engineering Requirements
PublisherIEEE
ISBN (Print)0-7695-2715-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sep 2006

Bibliographical note

© 2006 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Is a Dominant Service-Centric Sector Good for Diversity of Provision?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hutchinson, J., Sawyer, P., & Walkerdine, J. (2006). Is a Dominant Service-Centric Sector Good for Diversity of Provision? In SOCCER '06 Proceedings of the Service-Oriented Computing: Consequences for Engineering Requirements IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/SOCCER.2006.5