Le présent suffit-il à faire l'histoire?

Translated title of the contribution: Is the present sufficient for history?

Emmanuelle Labeau, Thomas Holyoak

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Our study discusses the ability of the présent historique, a tense « plus abstrait et donc plus difficile à comprendre » [more abstract and therefore more difficult to understand] (Béguin 1998, p. 36), to replace the passé simple (PS) in historical narration. It is based on a diachronic corpus of extracts taken from history books on the French Revolution, ranging from the beginning of the 19th century to the end of the 20th century. Firstly, we justify the primacy of the passé simple for historical narrative, while considering the wider areas of tense and aspect. After a description of the corpus and a summary of the hypotheses under study, we present our quantitative results with the aim of assessing the use of the présent historique in the corpus in comparison with other tenses. Finally, we study our corpus from a qualitative perspective and we try to conclude upon our initial hypotheses. © Revue Romane.

Original languageFrench
Pages (from-to)16-31
Number of pages16
JournalRevue romane
Volume42
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2007

Fingerprint

French revolution
present
narration
history
narrative
ability
Tense
History
Primacy
History Books
Summary
Narration
Diachronic Corpus
Corpus Study
Historical Narrative
French Revolution

Bibliographical note

Department of Romance Studies, University of Copenhagen; distributed by Wiley-Blackwell (Blackwell Publishing). The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com

Keywords

  • past historic
  • present historic
  • tense
  • aspect
  • history books
  • modern French

Cite this

Labeau, Emmanuelle ; Holyoak, Thomas. / Le présent suffit-il à faire l'histoire?. In: Revue romane. 2007 ; Vol. 42, No. 1. pp. 16-31.
@article{b81452174a574060b8e417c9f839d334,
title = "Le pr{\'e}sent suffit-il {\`a} faire l'histoire?",
abstract = "Our study discusses the ability of the pr{\'e}sent historique, a tense « plus abstrait et donc plus difficile {\`a} comprendre » [more abstract and therefore more difficult to understand] (B{\'e}guin 1998, p. 36), to replace the pass{\'e} simple (PS) in historical narration. It is based on a diachronic corpus of extracts taken from history books on the French Revolution, ranging from the beginning of the 19th century to the end of the 20th century. Firstly, we justify the primacy of the pass{\'e} simple for historical narrative, while considering the wider areas of tense and aspect. After a description of the corpus and a summary of the hypotheses under study, we present our quantitative results with the aim of assessing the use of the pr{\'e}sent historique in the corpus in comparison with other tenses. Finally, we study our corpus from a qualitative perspective and we try to conclude upon our initial hypotheses. {\circledC} Revue Romane.",
keywords = "past historic, present historic, tense, aspect, history books, modern French",
author = "Emmanuelle Labeau and Thomas Holyoak",
note = "Department of Romance Studies, University of Copenhagen; distributed by Wiley-Blackwell (Blackwell Publishing). The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com",
year = "2007",
language = "French",
volume = "42",
pages = "16--31",
journal = "Revue romane",
issn = "0035-3906",
publisher = "John Benjamins",
number = "1",

}

Labeau, E & Holyoak, T 2007, 'Le présent suffit-il à faire l'histoire?', Revue romane, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 16-31.

Le présent suffit-il à faire l'histoire? / Labeau, Emmanuelle; Holyoak, Thomas.

In: Revue romane, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2007, p. 16-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Le présent suffit-il à faire l'histoire?

AU - Labeau, Emmanuelle

AU - Holyoak, Thomas

N1 - Department of Romance Studies, University of Copenhagen; distributed by Wiley-Blackwell (Blackwell Publishing). The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Our study discusses the ability of the présent historique, a tense « plus abstrait et donc plus difficile à comprendre » [more abstract and therefore more difficult to understand] (Béguin 1998, p. 36), to replace the passé simple (PS) in historical narration. It is based on a diachronic corpus of extracts taken from history books on the French Revolution, ranging from the beginning of the 19th century to the end of the 20th century. Firstly, we justify the primacy of the passé simple for historical narrative, while considering the wider areas of tense and aspect. After a description of the corpus and a summary of the hypotheses under study, we present our quantitative results with the aim of assessing the use of the présent historique in the corpus in comparison with other tenses. Finally, we study our corpus from a qualitative perspective and we try to conclude upon our initial hypotheses. © Revue Romane.

AB - Our study discusses the ability of the présent historique, a tense « plus abstrait et donc plus difficile à comprendre » [more abstract and therefore more difficult to understand] (Béguin 1998, p. 36), to replace the passé simple (PS) in historical narration. It is based on a diachronic corpus of extracts taken from history books on the French Revolution, ranging from the beginning of the 19th century to the end of the 20th century. Firstly, we justify the primacy of the passé simple for historical narrative, while considering the wider areas of tense and aspect. After a description of the corpus and a summary of the hypotheses under study, we present our quantitative results with the aim of assessing the use of the présent historique in the corpus in comparison with other tenses. Finally, we study our corpus from a qualitative perspective and we try to conclude upon our initial hypotheses. © Revue Romane.

KW - past historic

KW - present historic

KW - tense

KW - aspect

KW - history books

KW - modern French

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=51249140592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 16

EP - 31

JO - Revue romane

JF - Revue romane

SN - 0035-3906

IS - 1

ER -