'It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it': barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience

Naomi E. Winstone, Robert A. Nash, James Rowntree, Michael Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

For feedback to be effective, it must be used by the receiver. Prior research has outlined numerous reasons why students’ use of feedback is sometimes limited, but there has been little systematic exploration of these barriers. In 11 activity-oriented focus groups, 31 undergraduate Psychology students discussed how they use assessment feedback. The data revealed many barriers that inhibit use of feedback, ranging from students’ difficulties with decoding terminology, to their unwillingness to expend effort. Thematic analysis identified four underlying psychological processes: awareness, cognisance, agency, and volition. We argue that these processes should be considered when designing interventions to encourage students’ engagement with feedback. Whereas the barriers identified could all in principle be removed, we propose that doing so would typically require – or would at least benefit from – a sharing of responsibility between teacher and student. The data highlight the importance of training students to be proactive receivers of feedback.
LanguageEnglish
Pages 2026-2041
Number of pages16
JournalStudies in Higher Education
Volume42
Issue number11
Early online date18 Jan 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

university
student
recipient
psychology student
technical language
responsibility
teacher
Group

Bibliographical note

© 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives
License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction
in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way

Keywords

  • feedback
  • interventions
  • student engagement
  • proactivity
  • communication
  • focus groups

Cite this

Winstone, Naomi E. ; Nash, Robert A. ; Rowntree, James ; Parker, Michael. / 'It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it' : barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. In: Studies in Higher Education. 2017 ; Vol. 42, No. 11. pp. 2026-2041 .
@article{b1a7c6c92b9e48598a5493ad9da6e7f7,
title = "'It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it': barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience",
abstract = "For feedback to be effective, it must be used by the receiver. Prior research has outlined numerous reasons why students’ use of feedback is sometimes limited, but there has been little systematic exploration of these barriers. In 11 activity-oriented focus groups, 31 undergraduate Psychology students discussed how they use assessment feedback. The data revealed many barriers that inhibit use of feedback, ranging from students’ difficulties with decoding terminology, to their unwillingness to expend effort. Thematic analysis identified four underlying psychological processes: awareness, cognisance, agency, and volition. We argue that these processes should be considered when designing interventions to encourage students’ engagement with feedback. Whereas the barriers identified could all in principle be removed, we propose that doing so would typically require – or would at least benefit from – a sharing of responsibility between teacher and student. The data highlight the importance of training students to be proactive receivers of feedback.",
keywords = "feedback, interventions, student engagement, proactivity, communication, focus groups",
author = "Winstone, {Naomi E.} and Nash, {Robert A.} and James Rowntree and Michael Parker",
note = "{\circledC} 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "2026--2041",
journal = "Studies in Higher Education",
issn = "0307-5079",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "11",

}

'It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it' : barriers to university students’ feedback seeking and recipience. / Winstone, Naomi E.; Nash, Robert A.; Rowntree, James; Parker, Michael.

In: Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 42, No. 11, 01.01.2017, p. 2026-2041 .

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 'It’d be useful, but I wouldn’t use it'

T2 - Studies in Higher Education

AU - Winstone, Naomi E.

AU - Nash, Robert A.

AU - Rowntree, James

AU - Parker, Michael

N1 - © 2016 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - For feedback to be effective, it must be used by the receiver. Prior research has outlined numerous reasons why students’ use of feedback is sometimes limited, but there has been little systematic exploration of these barriers. In 11 activity-oriented focus groups, 31 undergraduate Psychology students discussed how they use assessment feedback. The data revealed many barriers that inhibit use of feedback, ranging from students’ difficulties with decoding terminology, to their unwillingness to expend effort. Thematic analysis identified four underlying psychological processes: awareness, cognisance, agency, and volition. We argue that these processes should be considered when designing interventions to encourage students’ engagement with feedback. Whereas the barriers identified could all in principle be removed, we propose that doing so would typically require – or would at least benefit from – a sharing of responsibility between teacher and student. The data highlight the importance of training students to be proactive receivers of feedback.

AB - For feedback to be effective, it must be used by the receiver. Prior research has outlined numerous reasons why students’ use of feedback is sometimes limited, but there has been little systematic exploration of these barriers. In 11 activity-oriented focus groups, 31 undergraduate Psychology students discussed how they use assessment feedback. The data revealed many barriers that inhibit use of feedback, ranging from students’ difficulties with decoding terminology, to their unwillingness to expend effort. Thematic analysis identified four underlying psychological processes: awareness, cognisance, agency, and volition. We argue that these processes should be considered when designing interventions to encourage students’ engagement with feedback. Whereas the barriers identified could all in principle be removed, we propose that doing so would typically require – or would at least benefit from – a sharing of responsibility between teacher and student. The data highlight the importance of training students to be proactive receivers of feedback.

KW - feedback

KW - interventions

KW - student engagement

KW - proactivity

KW - communication

KW - focus groups

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954526598&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032

U2 - 10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032

DO - 10.1080/03075079.2015.1130032

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 2026

EP - 2041

JO - Studies in Higher Education

JF - Studies in Higher Education

SN - 0307-5079

IS - 11

ER -