Knowledge Acquisition Using Group Support Systems

Igor Pyrko, Colin Eden, Susan Howick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This paper reports on a project in which a group support system (GSS) equipped with a causal mapping facility was used to acquire knowledge from experts in seven European cities in order to understand the systemicity of risks which cities may face. The practical constraints demanded that participants’ experience and wisdom about the city risk environment was collected in a short period of time: three 1-day workshops. The acquisition of knowledge posed a number of important epistemological challenges which are explored in our discussion. The GSS was faced with the need to (1) facilitate sharing of knowledge with others, (2) manage the complexity of expert knowledge, (3) acknowledge the time demands on experts, (4) manage and merge multiple perspectives, and (5) acknowledge the subjectivity of knowledge in this domain. By discussing how the GSS process attended directly to these epistemological issues and to methodological considerations that linked to these issues, the paper contributes to a better understanding of the application of GSS for knowledge acquisition, particularly in comparison with other possible methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-253
Number of pages21
JournalGroup Decision and Negotiation
Volume28
Issue number2
Early online date18 Feb 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Apr 2019

Fingerprint

Knowledge acquisition
knowledge acquisition
Group
expert
expert knowledge
wisdom
subjectivity
Group support systems
Knowledge Acquisition
experience
time
Epistemological

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Keywords

  • Causal mapping
  • Group support systems
  • Knowledge acquisition
  • Resilience
  • Tacit knowledge

Cite this

Pyrko, Igor ; Eden, Colin ; Howick, Susan. / Knowledge Acquisition Using Group Support Systems. In: Group Decision and Negotiation. 2019 ; Vol. 28, No. 2. pp. 233-253.
@article{1623fa00a9a74e459941b8c007fc6b9d,
title = "Knowledge Acquisition Using Group Support Systems",
abstract = "This paper reports on a project in which a group support system (GSS) equipped with a causal mapping facility was used to acquire knowledge from experts in seven European cities in order to understand the systemicity of risks which cities may face. The practical constraints demanded that participants’ experience and wisdom about the city risk environment was collected in a short period of time: three 1-day workshops. The acquisition of knowledge posed a number of important epistemological challenges which are explored in our discussion. The GSS was faced with the need to (1) facilitate sharing of knowledge with others, (2) manage the complexity of expert knowledge, (3) acknowledge the time demands on experts, (4) manage and merge multiple perspectives, and (5) acknowledge the subjectivity of knowledge in this domain. By discussing how the GSS process attended directly to these epistemological issues and to methodological considerations that linked to these issues, the paper contributes to a better understanding of the application of GSS for knowledge acquisition, particularly in comparison with other possible methods.",
keywords = "Causal mapping, Group support systems, Knowledge acquisition, Resilience, Tacit knowledge",
author = "Igor Pyrko and Colin Eden and Susan Howick",
note = "{\circledC} The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.",
year = "2019",
month = "4",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s10726-019-09614-9",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "233--253",
journal = "Group Decision and Negotiation",
issn = "0926-2644",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

Knowledge Acquisition Using Group Support Systems. / Pyrko, Igor; Eden, Colin; Howick, Susan.

In: Group Decision and Negotiation, Vol. 28, No. 2, 15.04.2019, p. 233-253.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge Acquisition Using Group Support Systems

AU - Pyrko, Igor

AU - Eden, Colin

AU - Howick, Susan

N1 - © The Author(s) 2019. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

PY - 2019/4/15

Y1 - 2019/4/15

N2 - This paper reports on a project in which a group support system (GSS) equipped with a causal mapping facility was used to acquire knowledge from experts in seven European cities in order to understand the systemicity of risks which cities may face. The practical constraints demanded that participants’ experience and wisdom about the city risk environment was collected in a short period of time: three 1-day workshops. The acquisition of knowledge posed a number of important epistemological challenges which are explored in our discussion. The GSS was faced with the need to (1) facilitate sharing of knowledge with others, (2) manage the complexity of expert knowledge, (3) acknowledge the time demands on experts, (4) manage and merge multiple perspectives, and (5) acknowledge the subjectivity of knowledge in this domain. By discussing how the GSS process attended directly to these epistemological issues and to methodological considerations that linked to these issues, the paper contributes to a better understanding of the application of GSS for knowledge acquisition, particularly in comparison with other possible methods.

AB - This paper reports on a project in which a group support system (GSS) equipped with a causal mapping facility was used to acquire knowledge from experts in seven European cities in order to understand the systemicity of risks which cities may face. The practical constraints demanded that participants’ experience and wisdom about the city risk environment was collected in a short period of time: three 1-day workshops. The acquisition of knowledge posed a number of important epistemological challenges which are explored in our discussion. The GSS was faced with the need to (1) facilitate sharing of knowledge with others, (2) manage the complexity of expert knowledge, (3) acknowledge the time demands on experts, (4) manage and merge multiple perspectives, and (5) acknowledge the subjectivity of knowledge in this domain. By discussing how the GSS process attended directly to these epistemological issues and to methodological considerations that linked to these issues, the paper contributes to a better understanding of the application of GSS for knowledge acquisition, particularly in comparison with other possible methods.

KW - Causal mapping

KW - Group support systems

KW - Knowledge acquisition

KW - Resilience

KW - Tacit knowledge

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061741683&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10726-019-09614-9

U2 - 10.1007/s10726-019-09614-9

DO - 10.1007/s10726-019-09614-9

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 233

EP - 253

JO - Group Decision and Negotiation

JF - Group Decision and Negotiation

SN - 0926-2644

IS - 2

ER -