Knowledge and acknowledgement in Serbia's response to Srebrenica

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article considers some post-Milosevic Serbian responses to the Srebrenica massacre. The focus is on responses which contain strategies of denial or which broadly attempt to explain or justify the massacre without engaging critically with the atrocity itself. These responses are by no means uniform, nor are they the only ones which are available in Serbia. They provide the focus of this article because their presence has usually been misinterpreted as Serbia's failure to come to terms with the past. As this article argues, the existence of denial strategies in politics is predominantly pragmatic, whilst in the media and in private individual narratives are part of a larger process of starting to re-examine the past. This article will focus on several illustrative instances from politics and the media, as well as an individual witness responses, in order to demonstrate the extent to which Srebrenica is still in the process of being understood.
LanguageEnglish
Pages67-74
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Contemporary European Studies
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2009

Fingerprint

massacre
Serbia
politics
witness
pragmatics
narrative

Keywords

  • Srebrenica
  • post-Milosevic Serbia
  • war crimes
  • atrocities
  • denial
  • coping strategies

Cite this

@article{752f8d52cf9e478b8b093d10a03deb20,
title = "Knowledge and acknowledgement in Serbia's response to Srebrenica",
abstract = "This article considers some post-Milosevic Serbian responses to the Srebrenica massacre. The focus is on responses which contain strategies of denial or which broadly attempt to explain or justify the massacre without engaging critically with the atrocity itself. These responses are by no means uniform, nor are they the only ones which are available in Serbia. They provide the focus of this article because their presence has usually been misinterpreted as Serbia's failure to come to terms with the past. As this article argues, the existence of denial strategies in politics is predominantly pragmatic, whilst in the media and in private individual narratives are part of a larger process of starting to re-examine the past. This article will focus on several illustrative instances from politics and the media, as well as an individual witness responses, in order to demonstrate the extent to which Srebrenica is still in the process of being understood.",
keywords = "Srebrenica, post-Milosevic Serbia, war crimes, atrocities, denial, coping strategies",
author = "Jelena Obradović-Wochnik",
year = "2009",
month = "4",
doi = "10.1080/14782800902844719",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "67--74",
journal = "Journal of Contemporary European Studies",
issn = "1478-2804",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "1",

}

Knowledge and acknowledgement in Serbia's response to Srebrenica. / Obradović-Wochnik, Jelena.

In: Journal of Contemporary European Studies, Vol. 17, No. 1, 04.2009, p. 67-74.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Knowledge and acknowledgement in Serbia's response to Srebrenica

AU - Obradović-Wochnik, Jelena

PY - 2009/4

Y1 - 2009/4

N2 - This article considers some post-Milosevic Serbian responses to the Srebrenica massacre. The focus is on responses which contain strategies of denial or which broadly attempt to explain or justify the massacre without engaging critically with the atrocity itself. These responses are by no means uniform, nor are they the only ones which are available in Serbia. They provide the focus of this article because their presence has usually been misinterpreted as Serbia's failure to come to terms with the past. As this article argues, the existence of denial strategies in politics is predominantly pragmatic, whilst in the media and in private individual narratives are part of a larger process of starting to re-examine the past. This article will focus on several illustrative instances from politics and the media, as well as an individual witness responses, in order to demonstrate the extent to which Srebrenica is still in the process of being understood.

AB - This article considers some post-Milosevic Serbian responses to the Srebrenica massacre. The focus is on responses which contain strategies of denial or which broadly attempt to explain or justify the massacre without engaging critically with the atrocity itself. These responses are by no means uniform, nor are they the only ones which are available in Serbia. They provide the focus of this article because their presence has usually been misinterpreted as Serbia's failure to come to terms with the past. As this article argues, the existence of denial strategies in politics is predominantly pragmatic, whilst in the media and in private individual narratives are part of a larger process of starting to re-examine the past. This article will focus on several illustrative instances from politics and the media, as well as an individual witness responses, in order to demonstrate the extent to which Srebrenica is still in the process of being understood.

KW - Srebrenica

KW - post-Milosevic Serbia

KW - war crimes

KW - atrocities

KW - denial

KW - coping strategies

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=68149160376&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14782800902844719

U2 - 10.1080/14782800902844719

DO - 10.1080/14782800902844719

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 67

EP - 74

JO - Journal of Contemporary European Studies

T2 - Journal of Contemporary European Studies

JF - Journal of Contemporary European Studies

SN - 1478-2804

IS - 1

ER -