Leaders' sensemaking under crises: emerging cognitive consensus over time within management teams

Ian A. Combe*, David J. Carrington

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When facing a crisis, leaders' sensemaking can take a considerable amount of time due to the need to develop consensus in how to deal with it so that vision formation and sensegiving can take place. However, research into emerging cognitive consensus when leaders deal with a crisis over time is lacking. This is limiting a detailed understanding of how organizations respond to crises. The findings, based on a longitudinal analysis of cognitive maps within three management teams at a single organization, highlight considerable individual differences in cognitive content when starting to make sense of a crisis. Evidence for an emerging viable prescriptive mental model for the future was found, but not so much in the management as a whole. Instead, the findings highlight increasing cognitive consensus based on similarities in objectives and cause-effect beliefs within well-defined management teams over time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)307-322
Number of pages16
JournalLeadership Quarterly
Volume26
Issue number3
Early online date7 Apr 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015

Fingerprint

Time Management
Consensus
leader
management
Organizations
Individuality
Research
organization
cause
time
Time management
Sensemaking
evidence
Team management

Bibliographical note

© 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Funding: ESRC - EREBUS capacity building cluster - reference: RES-187-24-00

Keywords

  • cognitive content
  • cognitive mapping
  • collective leadership
  • mental models

Cite this

@article{f8c6936db0be43838193d821fcc301de,
title = "Leaders' sensemaking under crises: emerging cognitive consensus over time within management teams",
abstract = "When facing a crisis, leaders' sensemaking can take a considerable amount of time due to the need to develop consensus in how to deal with it so that vision formation and sensegiving can take place. However, research into emerging cognitive consensus when leaders deal with a crisis over time is lacking. This is limiting a detailed understanding of how organizations respond to crises. The findings, based on a longitudinal analysis of cognitive maps within three management teams at a single organization, highlight considerable individual differences in cognitive content when starting to make sense of a crisis. Evidence for an emerging viable prescriptive mental model for the future was found, but not so much in the management as a whole. Instead, the findings highlight increasing cognitive consensus based on similarities in objectives and cause-effect beliefs within well-defined management teams over time.",
keywords = "cognitive content, cognitive mapping, collective leadership, mental models",
author = "Combe, {Ian A.} and Carrington, {David J.}",
note = "{\circledC} 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funding: ESRC - EREBUS capacity building cluster - reference: RES-187-24-00",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.002",
language = "English",
volume = "26",
pages = "307--322",
journal = "Leadership Quarterly",
issn = "1048-9843",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Leaders' sensemaking under crises

T2 - emerging cognitive consensus over time within management teams

AU - Combe, Ian A.

AU - Carrington, David J.

N1 - © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Funding: ESRC - EREBUS capacity building cluster - reference: RES-187-24-00

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - When facing a crisis, leaders' sensemaking can take a considerable amount of time due to the need to develop consensus in how to deal with it so that vision formation and sensegiving can take place. However, research into emerging cognitive consensus when leaders deal with a crisis over time is lacking. This is limiting a detailed understanding of how organizations respond to crises. The findings, based on a longitudinal analysis of cognitive maps within three management teams at a single organization, highlight considerable individual differences in cognitive content when starting to make sense of a crisis. Evidence for an emerging viable prescriptive mental model for the future was found, but not so much in the management as a whole. Instead, the findings highlight increasing cognitive consensus based on similarities in objectives and cause-effect beliefs within well-defined management teams over time.

AB - When facing a crisis, leaders' sensemaking can take a considerable amount of time due to the need to develop consensus in how to deal with it so that vision formation and sensegiving can take place. However, research into emerging cognitive consensus when leaders deal with a crisis over time is lacking. This is limiting a detailed understanding of how organizations respond to crises. The findings, based on a longitudinal analysis of cognitive maps within three management teams at a single organization, highlight considerable individual differences in cognitive content when starting to make sense of a crisis. Evidence for an emerging viable prescriptive mental model for the future was found, but not so much in the management as a whole. Instead, the findings highlight increasing cognitive consensus based on similarities in objectives and cause-effect beliefs within well-defined management teams over time.

KW - cognitive content

KW - cognitive mapping

KW - collective leadership

KW - mental models

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84942984513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.002

DO - 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.02.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84942984513

VL - 26

SP - 307

EP - 322

JO - Leadership Quarterly

JF - Leadership Quarterly

SN - 1048-9843

IS - 3

ER -