TY - JOUR
T1 - Likelihood-ratio forensic voice comparison using parametric representations of the formant trajectories of diphthongs
AU - Morrison, Geoffrey Stewart
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Non-contemporaneous speech samples from 27 male speakers of Australian English were compared in a forensic likelihood-ratio framework. Parametric curves (polynomials and discrete cosine transforms) were fitted to the formant trajectories of the diphthongs a, e, o, a, and . The estimated coefficient values from the parametric curves were used as input to a generative multivariate-kernel-density formula for calculating likelihood ratios expressing the probability of obtaining the observed difference between two speech samples under the hypothesis that the samples were produced by the same speaker versus under the hypothesis that they were produced by different speakers. Cross-validated likelihood-ratio results from systems based on different parametric curves were calibrated and evaluated using the log-likelihood-ratio cost function (Cllr). The cross-validated likelihood ratios from the best-performing system for each vowel phoneme were fused using logistic regression. The resulting fused system had a very low error rate, thus meeting one of the requirements for admissibility in court.
AB - Non-contemporaneous speech samples from 27 male speakers of Australian English were compared in a forensic likelihood-ratio framework. Parametric curves (polynomials and discrete cosine transforms) were fitted to the formant trajectories of the diphthongs a, e, o, a, and . The estimated coefficient values from the parametric curves were used as input to a generative multivariate-kernel-density formula for calculating likelihood ratios expressing the probability of obtaining the observed difference between two speech samples under the hypothesis that the samples were produced by the same speaker versus under the hypothesis that they were produced by different speakers. Cross-validated likelihood-ratio results from systems based on different parametric curves were calibrated and evaluated using the log-likelihood-ratio cost function (Cllr). The cross-validated likelihood ratios from the best-performing system for each vowel phoneme were fused using logistic regression. The resulting fused system had a very low error rate, thus meeting one of the requirements for admissibility in court.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64649092391&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://asa.scitation.org/doi/full/10.1121/1.3081384
U2 - 10.1121/1.3081384
DO - 10.1121/1.3081384
M3 - Article
C2 - 19354412
AN - SCOPUS:64649092391
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 125
SP - 2387
EP - 2397
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 4
ER -