Localizing the deficit in a case of jargonaphasia

Andrew C. Olson*, Cristina Romani, Liz Halloran

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We report the case of a neologistic jargonaphasic and ask whether her target-related and abstruse neologisms are the result of a single deficit, which affects some items more severely than others, or two deficits: one to lexical access and the other to phonological encoding. We analyse both correct/incorrect performance and errors and apply both traditional and formal methods (maximum-likelihood estimation and model selection). All evidence points to a single deficit at the level of phonological encoding. Further characteristics are used to constrain the locus still further. V.S. does not show the type of length effect expected of a memory component, nor the pattern of errors associated with an articulatory deficit. We conclude that her neologistic errors can result from a single deficit at a level of phonological encoding that immediately follows lexical access where segments are represented in terms of their features. We do not conclude, however, that this is the only possible locus that will produce phonological errors in aphasia, or, indeed, jargonaphasia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-238
Number of pages28
JournalCognitive Neuropsychology
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2007

Fingerprint

Aphasia
Phonological Encoding
Lexical Access
Locus

Cite this

Olson, Andrew C. ; Romani, Cristina ; Halloran, Liz. / Localizing the deficit in a case of jargonaphasia. In: Cognitive Neuropsychology. 2007 ; Vol. 24, No. 2. pp. 211-238.
@article{79ddc2e6b91b4ade95d50cb5d0c58df4,
title = "Localizing the deficit in a case of jargonaphasia",
abstract = "We report the case of a neologistic jargonaphasic and ask whether her target-related and abstruse neologisms are the result of a single deficit, which affects some items more severely than others, or two deficits: one to lexical access and the other to phonological encoding. We analyse both correct/incorrect performance and errors and apply both traditional and formal methods (maximum-likelihood estimation and model selection). All evidence points to a single deficit at the level of phonological encoding. Further characteristics are used to constrain the locus still further. V.S. does not show the type of length effect expected of a memory component, nor the pattern of errors associated with an articulatory deficit. We conclude that her neologistic errors can result from a single deficit at a level of phonological encoding that immediately follows lexical access where segments are represented in terms of their features. We do not conclude, however, that this is the only possible locus that will produce phonological errors in aphasia, or, indeed, jargonaphasia.",
author = "Olson, {Andrew C.} and Cristina Romani and Liz Halloran",
year = "2007",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/02643290601137017",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "211--238",
journal = "Cognitive Neuropsychology",
issn = "0264-3294",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "2",

}

Localizing the deficit in a case of jargonaphasia. / Olson, Andrew C.; Romani, Cristina; Halloran, Liz.

In: Cognitive Neuropsychology, Vol. 24, No. 2, 03.2007, p. 211-238.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Localizing the deficit in a case of jargonaphasia

AU - Olson, Andrew C.

AU - Romani, Cristina

AU - Halloran, Liz

PY - 2007/3

Y1 - 2007/3

N2 - We report the case of a neologistic jargonaphasic and ask whether her target-related and abstruse neologisms are the result of a single deficit, which affects some items more severely than others, or two deficits: one to lexical access and the other to phonological encoding. We analyse both correct/incorrect performance and errors and apply both traditional and formal methods (maximum-likelihood estimation and model selection). All evidence points to a single deficit at the level of phonological encoding. Further characteristics are used to constrain the locus still further. V.S. does not show the type of length effect expected of a memory component, nor the pattern of errors associated with an articulatory deficit. We conclude that her neologistic errors can result from a single deficit at a level of phonological encoding that immediately follows lexical access where segments are represented in terms of their features. We do not conclude, however, that this is the only possible locus that will produce phonological errors in aphasia, or, indeed, jargonaphasia.

AB - We report the case of a neologistic jargonaphasic and ask whether her target-related and abstruse neologisms are the result of a single deficit, which affects some items more severely than others, or two deficits: one to lexical access and the other to phonological encoding. We analyse both correct/incorrect performance and errors and apply both traditional and formal methods (maximum-likelihood estimation and model selection). All evidence points to a single deficit at the level of phonological encoding. Further characteristics are used to constrain the locus still further. V.S. does not show the type of length effect expected of a memory component, nor the pattern of errors associated with an articulatory deficit. We conclude that her neologistic errors can result from a single deficit at a level of phonological encoding that immediately follows lexical access where segments are represented in terms of their features. We do not conclude, however, that this is the only possible locus that will produce phonological errors in aphasia, or, indeed, jargonaphasia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34147180592&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02643290601137017

U2 - 10.1080/02643290601137017

DO - 10.1080/02643290601137017

M3 - Article

C2 - 18416489

VL - 24

SP - 211

EP - 238

JO - Cognitive Neuropsychology

JF - Cognitive Neuropsychology

SN - 0264-3294

IS - 2

ER -