Managing crisis: the role of primary care for people with serious mental illness

Helen Lester, Jonathan Q. Tritter, Helen Sorohan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background and Objectives: More than 30% of patients with serious mental illness in the United Kingdom now receive all their health care solely from primary care. This study explored the process of managing acute mental health crises from the dual perspective of patients and primary care health professionals. Methods: Eighteen focus groups involving 45 patients, 39 general practitioners, and eight practice nurses were held between May and November 2002 in six Primary Care Trusts across the British West Midlands. The topic guide explored perceptions of gold standard care, current issues and critical incidents in receiving/providing care, and ideas on improving services. Results: Themes relevant to the management of acute crisis included issues of process, such as access, advocacy, communication, continuity, and coordination of care; the development of more structured care that might reduce the need for crisis responses; and issues raised by the development of a more structured approach to care. Conclusions: Access to services is a complicated yet crucial feature of managing care in a crisis, with patients identifying barriers at the level of primary care and health professionals at the interface with secondary care. The development of more structured systems as a solution may generate its own ethical and pragmatic challenges.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)28-34
Number of pages7
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume36
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2004

Fingerprint

Primary Health Care
Secondary Care
Continuity of Patient Care
Standard of Care
Focus Groups
General Practitioners
Patient Care
Mental Health
Nurses
Communication
Delivery of Health Care
Health

Cite this

@article{af2bc5658597420097cca2bafc3b9235,
title = "Managing crisis: the role of primary care for people with serious mental illness",
abstract = "Background and Objectives: More than 30{\%} of patients with serious mental illness in the United Kingdom now receive all their health care solely from primary care. This study explored the process of managing acute mental health crises from the dual perspective of patients and primary care health professionals. Methods: Eighteen focus groups involving 45 patients, 39 general practitioners, and eight practice nurses were held between May and November 2002 in six Primary Care Trusts across the British West Midlands. The topic guide explored perceptions of gold standard care, current issues and critical incidents in receiving/providing care, and ideas on improving services. Results: Themes relevant to the management of acute crisis included issues of process, such as access, advocacy, communication, continuity, and coordination of care; the development of more structured care that might reduce the need for crisis responses; and issues raised by the development of a more structured approach to care. Conclusions: Access to services is a complicated yet crucial feature of managing care in a crisis, with patients identifying barriers at the level of primary care and health professionals at the interface with secondary care. The development of more structured systems as a solution may generate its own ethical and pragmatic challenges.",
author = "Helen Lester and Tritter, {Jonathan Q.} and Helen Sorohan",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "28--34",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "1",

}

Managing crisis : the role of primary care for people with serious mental illness. / Lester, Helen; Tritter, Jonathan Q.; Sorohan, Helen.

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 36, No. 1, 01.2004, p. 28-34.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Managing crisis

T2 - the role of primary care for people with serious mental illness

AU - Lester, Helen

AU - Tritter, Jonathan Q.

AU - Sorohan, Helen

PY - 2004/1

Y1 - 2004/1

N2 - Background and Objectives: More than 30% of patients with serious mental illness in the United Kingdom now receive all their health care solely from primary care. This study explored the process of managing acute mental health crises from the dual perspective of patients and primary care health professionals. Methods: Eighteen focus groups involving 45 patients, 39 general practitioners, and eight practice nurses were held between May and November 2002 in six Primary Care Trusts across the British West Midlands. The topic guide explored perceptions of gold standard care, current issues and critical incidents in receiving/providing care, and ideas on improving services. Results: Themes relevant to the management of acute crisis included issues of process, such as access, advocacy, communication, continuity, and coordination of care; the development of more structured care that might reduce the need for crisis responses; and issues raised by the development of a more structured approach to care. Conclusions: Access to services is a complicated yet crucial feature of managing care in a crisis, with patients identifying barriers at the level of primary care and health professionals at the interface with secondary care. The development of more structured systems as a solution may generate its own ethical and pragmatic challenges.

AB - Background and Objectives: More than 30% of patients with serious mental illness in the United Kingdom now receive all their health care solely from primary care. This study explored the process of managing acute mental health crises from the dual perspective of patients and primary care health professionals. Methods: Eighteen focus groups involving 45 patients, 39 general practitioners, and eight practice nurses were held between May and November 2002 in six Primary Care Trusts across the British West Midlands. The topic guide explored perceptions of gold standard care, current issues and critical incidents in receiving/providing care, and ideas on improving services. Results: Themes relevant to the management of acute crisis included issues of process, such as access, advocacy, communication, continuity, and coordination of care; the development of more structured care that might reduce the need for crisis responses; and issues raised by the development of a more structured approach to care. Conclusions: Access to services is a complicated yet crucial feature of managing care in a crisis, with patients identifying barriers at the level of primary care and health professionals at the interface with secondary care. The development of more structured systems as a solution may generate its own ethical and pragmatic challenges.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0346340038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0346340038

VL - 36

SP - 28

EP - 34

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 1

ER -