Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mapping Interictal activity in epilepsy using a hidden Markov model: A magnetoencephalography study

  • Zelekha A. Seedat
  • , Lukas Rier
  • , Lauren E. Gascoyne
  • , Harry Cook
  • , Mark W. Woolrich
  • , Andrew J. Quinn
  • , Timothy P. L. Roberts
  • , Paul L. Furlong
  • , Caren Armstrong
  • , Kelly St. Pier
  • , Karen J. Mullinger
  • , Eric D. Marsh
  • , Matthew J. Brookes
  • , William Gaetz
    • Young Epilepsy St Pier's Lane Lingfield RH7 6PW UK
    • Sir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, United Kingdom
    • Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital Oxford UK
    • Department of Radiology Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
    • Pediatric Epilepsy Program, Division of Child Neurology CHOP Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
    • Centre for Human Brain Health, School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
    • Departments of Neurology and Paediatrics University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

    22 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Epilepsy is a highly heterogeneous neurological disorder with variable etiology, manifestation, and response to treatment. It is imperative that new models of epileptiform brain activity account for this variability, to identify individual needs and allow clinicians to curate personalized care. Here, we use a hidden Markov model (HMM) to create a unique statistical model of interictal brain activity for 10 pediatric patients. We use magnetoencephalography (MEG) data acquired as part of standard clinical care for patients at the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia. These data are routinely analyzed using excess kurtosis mapping (EKM); however, as cases become more complex (extreme multifocal and/or polymorphic activity), they become harder to interpret with EKM. We assessed the performance of the HMM against EKM for three patient groups, with increasingly complicated presentation. The difference in localization of epileptogenic foci for the two methods was 7 ± 2 mm (mean ± SD over all 10 patients); and 94% ± 13% of EKM temporal markers were matched by an HMM state visit. The HMM localizes epileptogenic areas (in agreement with EKM) and provides additional information about the relationship between those areas. A key advantage over current methods is that the HMM is a data-driven model, so the output is tuned to each individual. Finally, the model output is intuitive, allowing a user (clinician) to review the result and manually select the HMM epileptiform state, offering multiple advantages over previous methods and allowing for broader implementation of MEG epileptiform analysis in surgical decision-making for patients with intractable epilepsy.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)66-81
    JournalHuman Brain Mapping
    Volume44
    Issue number1
    Early online date19 Oct 2022
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Jan 2023

    Bibliographical note

    Copyright © 2022, The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

    Keywords

    • Neurology (clinical)
    • Neurology
    • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
    • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
    • Anatomy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping Interictal activity in epilepsy using a hidden Markov model: A magnetoencephalography study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this