Market share, concentration and divesification in firm profitability

S Feeny, M Rogers

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

This paper provides a review of the role of market share, concentration and diversification in firm performance. An empirical analysis of the profitability of 722 large Australian firms for the period 1993 to 1996 is also undertaken. Using simple regression techniques the analysis suggests that industry concentration (as proxied by the 4-firm concentration ratio) has a positive influence on profitability. The market share of a firm does not appear to have any significant linear association with profitability, however, a non-monotonic relationship is found to be significant. This suggests that as market share increases to around 30% (of a 3-digit ANZSIC industry) profitability declines. When market share increases above 30% profitability rises, although only 9 firms in our sample have market shares above 30%. The extent of diversification appears to have little influence on profitability although, when loss making firms are excluded from the analysis, more focused firms do appear to have higher profitability.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherMelbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research
Number of pages40
Publication statusUnpublished - 1999

Publication series

NameMelbourne Institute Working Paper
No.20/99

Fingerprint

Firm profitability
Profitability
Market share
Diversification
Industry profitability
Industry concentration
Concentration ratio
Empirical analysis
Firm performance

Keywords

  • market share
  • concentration
  • diversification
  • firm profitability

Cite this

Feeny, S., & Rogers, M. (1999). Market share, concentration and divesification in firm profitability. (Melbourne Institute Working Paper; No. 20/99). Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
Feeny, S ; Rogers, M. / Market share, concentration and divesification in firm profitability. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, 1999. (Melbourne Institute Working Paper; 20/99).
@techreport{cef0bb9d723343fa9fd0bc06f90e461e,
title = "Market share, concentration and divesification in firm profitability",
abstract = "This paper provides a review of the role of market share, concentration and diversification in firm performance. An empirical analysis of the profitability of 722 large Australian firms for the period 1993 to 1996 is also undertaken. Using simple regression techniques the analysis suggests that industry concentration (as proxied by the 4-firm concentration ratio) has a positive influence on profitability. The market share of a firm does not appear to have any significant linear association with profitability, however, a non-monotonic relationship is found to be significant. This suggests that as market share increases to around 30{\%} (of a 3-digit ANZSIC industry) profitability declines. When market share increases above 30{\%} profitability rises, although only 9 firms in our sample have market shares above 30{\%}. The extent of diversification appears to have little influence on profitability although, when loss making firms are excluded from the analysis, more focused firms do appear to have higher profitability.",
keywords = "market share, concentration, diversification, firm profitability",
author = "S Feeny and M Rogers",
year = "1999",
language = "English",
series = "Melbourne Institute Working Paper",
publisher = "Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research",
number = "20/99",
type = "WorkingPaper",
institution = "Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research",

}

Feeny, S & Rogers, M 1999 'Market share, concentration and divesification in firm profitability' Melbourne Institute Working Paper, no. 20/99, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.

Market share, concentration and divesification in firm profitability. / Feeny, S; Rogers, M.

Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, 1999. (Melbourne Institute Working Paper; No. 20/99).

Research output: Working paper

TY - UNPB

T1 - Market share, concentration and divesification in firm profitability

AU - Feeny, S

AU - Rogers, M

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - This paper provides a review of the role of market share, concentration and diversification in firm performance. An empirical analysis of the profitability of 722 large Australian firms for the period 1993 to 1996 is also undertaken. Using simple regression techniques the analysis suggests that industry concentration (as proxied by the 4-firm concentration ratio) has a positive influence on profitability. The market share of a firm does not appear to have any significant linear association with profitability, however, a non-monotonic relationship is found to be significant. This suggests that as market share increases to around 30% (of a 3-digit ANZSIC industry) profitability declines. When market share increases above 30% profitability rises, although only 9 firms in our sample have market shares above 30%. The extent of diversification appears to have little influence on profitability although, when loss making firms are excluded from the analysis, more focused firms do appear to have higher profitability.

AB - This paper provides a review of the role of market share, concentration and diversification in firm performance. An empirical analysis of the profitability of 722 large Australian firms for the period 1993 to 1996 is also undertaken. Using simple regression techniques the analysis suggests that industry concentration (as proxied by the 4-firm concentration ratio) has a positive influence on profitability. The market share of a firm does not appear to have any significant linear association with profitability, however, a non-monotonic relationship is found to be significant. This suggests that as market share increases to around 30% (of a 3-digit ANZSIC industry) profitability declines. When market share increases above 30% profitability rises, although only 9 firms in our sample have market shares above 30%. The extent of diversification appears to have little influence on profitability although, when loss making firms are excluded from the analysis, more focused firms do appear to have higher profitability.

KW - market share

KW - concentration

KW - diversification

KW - firm profitability

M3 - Working paper

T3 - Melbourne Institute Working Paper

BT - Market share, concentration and divesification in firm profitability

PB - Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research

ER -

Feeny S, Rogers M. Market share, concentration and divesification in firm profitability. Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research. 1999. (Melbourne Institute Working Paper; 20/99).