Master and apprentice or difference and complementarity? Local government practioners, doctoral studies and co-produced research

Josie Kelly, Philip Lloyd-Williams

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In their search for innovative policy solutions to complex social problematics, local governance practitioners will look to synergising specific policy guidance from government departments with conceptual scientific research outputs. UK academics are also now expected to emphasise the relevance of their research and to increase its utilisation by practitioners. Away from utilitarian pressures, academics from applied discipline, such as Public Administration and Local Government Studies are increasingly drawn to the benefits of co-produced research. Despite the pressure for more co-research there are few opportunities for practitioners and academics to nurture relationships that would support close collaboration. This paper looks at the opportunity for closer collaboration when practitioners undertake research degrees, in order to enhance their cognitive skills and develop greater scientific knowledge of particular policy domains. If this route to closer collaboration is to succeed, it will require academics to think differently about their relationship with practitioner-students.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-252
Number of pages17
JournalLocal Government Studies
Volume39
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 11 Jun 2012

Keywords

  • local governance practitioner
  • doctoral research
  • co-research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Master and apprentice or difference and complementarity? Local government practioners, doctoral studies and co-produced research'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this