Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Maternal responsiveness to child receptiveness and fullness cues from 8 to 24 months of age and their relation with complementary feeding approach and language proficiency

  • Alice Di Prete
  • , Guido Maria Caruso
  • , Denise Del Grosso
  • , Eleonora Giacomini
  • , Sara Picuno
  • , Giulia Trappetti
  • , Valentina Focaroli
  • , Melania Paoletti
  • , Giulia Pecora
  • , Barbara Caravale
  • , Corinna Gasparini
  • , Serena Gastaldi
  • , Flavia Chiarotti
  • , Claire Farrow
  • , Amy T Galloway
  • , Eric A Hodges
  • , Francesca Bellagamba
  • , Elsa Addessi*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
  • Università degli Studi "Niccolò Cusano"
  • Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata"
  • Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione
  • Istituto Superiore di Sanità
  • Appalachian State University
  • The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We investigated the relationship between the complementary feeding approach (Baby-Led Weaning, Parent-Led Weaning or a mixed approach) and maternal responsiveness to child feeding cues in 166 children using mealtime observations at 8, 12, 18 and 24 months of age. We also explored whether maternally reported child linguistic proficiency was related to observed maternal responsiveness during mealtimes. Results suggest that mothers were more responsive to child receptiveness to eat when their children were 12 and 18 months old compared to when they were 8 months old. Mothers were increasingly responsive to their child's fullness cues at 8, 12, and 18 months. Mothers were less responsive to fullness when children were 24 months compared to 18 months old; although not assessed directly this may reflect a developmentally expected increase in child neophobia and picky eating as children age. Maternal responsiveness to fullness was positively correlated with child consumption of fruit and vegetables, which are usually among the least consumed food categories by neophobic and picky children. Furthermore, mothers who were more responsive to their infants' receptiveness to eat reported significantly lower levels of child verbal production at 12 months. In contrast, mothers who were more responsive to child fullness cues reported higher levels of infant verbal production, regardless of child age. Responsiveness to fullness was also positively related to proportion of self-feeding, which is a key feature of Baby-Led Weaning. In conclusion, in the first 18 months of life maternal responsiveness during mealtimes increased over time and was related to child language proficiency and ability to eat independently. These findings may extend to maternal responsiveness in contexts other than mealtimes with potential implications for the child socio-emotional development.

Original languageEnglish
Article number108224
Number of pages9
JournalAppetite
Volume214
Early online date7 Jul 2025
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2025

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync-
nd/4.0/ ).

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale [PRIN 2017], grant number 2017WH8B84, to E.A. and F.B., and by the European Union - Next Generation EU, Mission 4 Component 1 CUP B53D23014810006 and B53D23014820006 (PRIN 2022 grant number 2022S8PEY7). Alice Di Prete was funded by a PHD fellowship from the European Union - Next Generation EU, Mission 4 Component 1 CUP B53C23002130006.

Keywords

  • Baby-led weaning
  • Complementary feeding
  • Responsiveness
  • Self-regulation
  • Weaning phase

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Maternal responsiveness to child receptiveness and fullness cues from 8 to 24 months of age and their relation with complementary feeding approach and language proficiency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this