Measuring the influence of similarity on category-specific effects

Laura R. Shapiro, Koen Lamberts, Andrew C. Olson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is evidence for both advantages and disadvantages in normal recognition of living over nonliving things. This paradox has been attributed to high levels of perceptual similarity within living categories having a different effect on performance in different contexts. However, since living things are intrinsically more similar to each other, previous studies could not determine whether the various category effects were due to perceptual similarity, or to other characteristics of living things. We used novel animal and vehicle stimuli that were matched for similarity to measure the influence of perceptual similarity in different contexts. We found that displaying highly similar objects in blocked sets reduced their perceived similarity, eliminating the detrimental effect on naming performance. Experiment 1 demonstrated a disadvantage for highly similar objects in name learning and name verification using mixed groups of similar and dissimilar animals and vehicles. Experiment 2 demonstrated no disadvantage for the same highly similar objects when they were blocked, e.g., similar animals presented alone. Thus, perceptual similarity, rather than other characteristics particular to living things, is affected by context, and could create apparent category effects under certain testing conditions.
LanguageEnglish
Pages346-366
Number of pages21
JournalEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume20
Issue number2
Early online date7 Feb 2008
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2008

Fingerprint

Names
Learning
Recognition (Psychology)

Bibliographical note

This is an electronic version of an article published in Shapiro, L. R., Lamberts, K., & Olson, A. C. (2008). Measuring the influence of similarity on category-specific effects. European journal of cognitive psychology, 20(2), 346-366. European journal of cognitive psychology is available online at http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=0954-1446&volume=20&issue=2&spage=346

Keywords

  • normal recognition
  • perceptual similarity
  • living categories
  • vehicle stimuli

Cite this

Shapiro, Laura R. ; Lamberts, Koen ; Olson, Andrew C. / Measuring the influence of similarity on category-specific effects. In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2008 ; Vol. 20, No. 2. pp. 346-366.
@article{9b9eb2813f0c4a74af1cf6a74bafb88e,
title = "Measuring the influence of similarity on category-specific effects",
abstract = "There is evidence for both advantages and disadvantages in normal recognition of living over nonliving things. This paradox has been attributed to high levels of perceptual similarity within living categories having a different effect on performance in different contexts. However, since living things are intrinsically more similar to each other, previous studies could not determine whether the various category effects were due to perceptual similarity, or to other characteristics of living things. We used novel animal and vehicle stimuli that were matched for similarity to measure the influence of perceptual similarity in different contexts. We found that displaying highly similar objects in blocked sets reduced their perceived similarity, eliminating the detrimental effect on naming performance. Experiment 1 demonstrated a disadvantage for highly similar objects in name learning and name verification using mixed groups of similar and dissimilar animals and vehicles. Experiment 2 demonstrated no disadvantage for the same highly similar objects when they were blocked, e.g., similar animals presented alone. Thus, perceptual similarity, rather than other characteristics particular to living things, is affected by context, and could create apparent category effects under certain testing conditions.",
keywords = "normal recognition, perceptual similarity, living categories, vehicle stimuli",
author = "Shapiro, {Laura R.} and Koen Lamberts and Olson, {Andrew C.}",
note = "This is an electronic version of an article published in Shapiro, L. R., Lamberts, K., & Olson, A. C. (2008). Measuring the influence of similarity on category-specific effects. European journal of cognitive psychology, 20(2), 346-366. European journal of cognitive psychology is available online at http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=0954-1446&volume=20&issue=2&spage=346",
year = "2008",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1080/09541440601155570",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "346--366",
journal = "European Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "0954-1446",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "2",

}

Measuring the influence of similarity on category-specific effects. / Shapiro, Laura R.; Lamberts, Koen; Olson, Andrew C.

In: European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 2, 03.2008, p. 346-366.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Measuring the influence of similarity on category-specific effects

AU - Shapiro, Laura R.

AU - Lamberts, Koen

AU - Olson, Andrew C.

N1 - This is an electronic version of an article published in Shapiro, L. R., Lamberts, K., & Olson, A. C. (2008). Measuring the influence of similarity on category-specific effects. European journal of cognitive psychology, 20(2), 346-366. European journal of cognitive psychology is available online at http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&issn=0954-1446&volume=20&issue=2&spage=346

PY - 2008/3

Y1 - 2008/3

N2 - There is evidence for both advantages and disadvantages in normal recognition of living over nonliving things. This paradox has been attributed to high levels of perceptual similarity within living categories having a different effect on performance in different contexts. However, since living things are intrinsically more similar to each other, previous studies could not determine whether the various category effects were due to perceptual similarity, or to other characteristics of living things. We used novel animal and vehicle stimuli that were matched for similarity to measure the influence of perceptual similarity in different contexts. We found that displaying highly similar objects in blocked sets reduced their perceived similarity, eliminating the detrimental effect on naming performance. Experiment 1 demonstrated a disadvantage for highly similar objects in name learning and name verification using mixed groups of similar and dissimilar animals and vehicles. Experiment 2 demonstrated no disadvantage for the same highly similar objects when they were blocked, e.g., similar animals presented alone. Thus, perceptual similarity, rather than other characteristics particular to living things, is affected by context, and could create apparent category effects under certain testing conditions.

AB - There is evidence for both advantages and disadvantages in normal recognition of living over nonliving things. This paradox has been attributed to high levels of perceptual similarity within living categories having a different effect on performance in different contexts. However, since living things are intrinsically more similar to each other, previous studies could not determine whether the various category effects were due to perceptual similarity, or to other characteristics of living things. We used novel animal and vehicle stimuli that were matched for similarity to measure the influence of perceptual similarity in different contexts. We found that displaying highly similar objects in blocked sets reduced their perceived similarity, eliminating the detrimental effect on naming performance. Experiment 1 demonstrated a disadvantage for highly similar objects in name learning and name verification using mixed groups of similar and dissimilar animals and vehicles. Experiment 2 demonstrated no disadvantage for the same highly similar objects when they were blocked, e.g., similar animals presented alone. Thus, perceptual similarity, rather than other characteristics particular to living things, is affected by context, and could create apparent category effects under certain testing conditions.

KW - normal recognition

KW - perceptual similarity

KW - living categories

KW - vehicle stimuli

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38949133752&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09541440601155570

DO - 10.1080/09541440601155570

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 346

EP - 366

JO - European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

T2 - European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - European Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 0954-1446

IS - 2

ER -