Memory for expectation-violating concepts: The effects of agents and cultural familiarity

Michaela Porubanova, Daniel Joel Shaw, Ryan McKay, Dimitris Xygalatas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Previous research has shown that ideas which violate our expectations, such as schema-inconsistent concepts, enjoy privileged status in terms of memorability. In our study, memory for concepts that violate cultural (cultural schema-level) expectations (e.g., "illiterate teacher", "wooden bottle", or "thorny grass") versus domain-level (ontological) expectations (e.g., "speaking cat", "jumping maple", or "melting teacher") was examined. Concepts that violate cultural expectations, or counter-schematic, were remembered to a greater extent compared with concepts that violate ontological expectations and with intuitive concepts (e.g., "galloping pony", "drying orchid", or "convertible car"), in both immediate recall, and delayed recognition tests. Importantly, concepts related to agents showed a memory advantage over concepts not pertaining to agents, but this was true only for expectation-violating concepts. Our results imply that intuitive, everyday concepts are equally attractive and memorable regardless of the presence or absence of agents. However, concepts that violate our expectations (cultural-schema or domain-level) are more memorable when pertaining to agents (humans and animals) than to non-agents (plants or objects/artifacts). We conclude that due to their evolutionary salience, cultural ideas which combine expectancy violations and the involvement of an agent are especially memorable and thus have an enhanced probability of being successfully propagated. © 2014 Porubanova et al.
LanguageEnglish
Article numbere90684
JournalPLoS ONE
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2014

Fingerprint

teachers
Acer
Data storage equipment
jumping
Poaceae
melting
Short-Term Memory
bottles
Artifacts
Freezing
Cats
drying
cats
grasses
horses
Research
Schematic diagrams
Bottles
animals
testing

Cite this

Porubanova, Michaela ; Shaw, Daniel Joel ; McKay, Ryan ; Xygalatas, Dimitris. / Memory for expectation-violating concepts : The effects of agents and cultural familiarity. In: PLoS ONE. 2014 ; Vol. 9, No. 4.
@article{ac39b07efba94d1f9d9254b0097d113d,
title = "Memory for expectation-violating concepts: The effects of agents and cultural familiarity",
abstract = "Previous research has shown that ideas which violate our expectations, such as schema-inconsistent concepts, enjoy privileged status in terms of memorability. In our study, memory for concepts that violate cultural (cultural schema-level) expectations (e.g., {"}illiterate teacher{"}, {"}wooden bottle{"}, or {"}thorny grass{"}) versus domain-level (ontological) expectations (e.g., {"}speaking cat{"}, {"}jumping maple{"}, or {"}melting teacher{"}) was examined. Concepts that violate cultural expectations, or counter-schematic, were remembered to a greater extent compared with concepts that violate ontological expectations and with intuitive concepts (e.g., {"}galloping pony{"}, {"}drying orchid{"}, or {"}convertible car{"}), in both immediate recall, and delayed recognition tests. Importantly, concepts related to agents showed a memory advantage over concepts not pertaining to agents, but this was true only for expectation-violating concepts. Our results imply that intuitive, everyday concepts are equally attractive and memorable regardless of the presence or absence of agents. However, concepts that violate our expectations (cultural-schema or domain-level) are more memorable when pertaining to agents (humans and animals) than to non-agents (plants or objects/artifacts). We conclude that due to their evolutionary salience, cultural ideas which combine expectancy violations and the involvement of an agent are especially memorable and thus have an enhanced probability of being successfully propagated. {\circledC} 2014 Porubanova et al.",
author = "Michaela Porubanova and Shaw, {Daniel Joel} and Ryan McKay and Dimitris Xygalatas",
year = "2014",
month = "4",
day = "8",
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0090684",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
journal = "PLoS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "Public Library of Science",
number = "4",

}

Memory for expectation-violating concepts : The effects of agents and cultural familiarity. / Porubanova, Michaela; Shaw, Daniel Joel; McKay, Ryan; Xygalatas, Dimitris.

In: PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, No. 4, e90684, 08.04.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Memory for expectation-violating concepts

T2 - PLoS ONE

AU - Porubanova, Michaela

AU - Shaw, Daniel Joel

AU - McKay, Ryan

AU - Xygalatas, Dimitris

PY - 2014/4/8

Y1 - 2014/4/8

N2 - Previous research has shown that ideas which violate our expectations, such as schema-inconsistent concepts, enjoy privileged status in terms of memorability. In our study, memory for concepts that violate cultural (cultural schema-level) expectations (e.g., "illiterate teacher", "wooden bottle", or "thorny grass") versus domain-level (ontological) expectations (e.g., "speaking cat", "jumping maple", or "melting teacher") was examined. Concepts that violate cultural expectations, or counter-schematic, were remembered to a greater extent compared with concepts that violate ontological expectations and with intuitive concepts (e.g., "galloping pony", "drying orchid", or "convertible car"), in both immediate recall, and delayed recognition tests. Importantly, concepts related to agents showed a memory advantage over concepts not pertaining to agents, but this was true only for expectation-violating concepts. Our results imply that intuitive, everyday concepts are equally attractive and memorable regardless of the presence or absence of agents. However, concepts that violate our expectations (cultural-schema or domain-level) are more memorable when pertaining to agents (humans and animals) than to non-agents (plants or objects/artifacts). We conclude that due to their evolutionary salience, cultural ideas which combine expectancy violations and the involvement of an agent are especially memorable and thus have an enhanced probability of being successfully propagated. © 2014 Porubanova et al.

AB - Previous research has shown that ideas which violate our expectations, such as schema-inconsistent concepts, enjoy privileged status in terms of memorability. In our study, memory for concepts that violate cultural (cultural schema-level) expectations (e.g., "illiterate teacher", "wooden bottle", or "thorny grass") versus domain-level (ontological) expectations (e.g., "speaking cat", "jumping maple", or "melting teacher") was examined. Concepts that violate cultural expectations, or counter-schematic, were remembered to a greater extent compared with concepts that violate ontological expectations and with intuitive concepts (e.g., "galloping pony", "drying orchid", or "convertible car"), in both immediate recall, and delayed recognition tests. Importantly, concepts related to agents showed a memory advantage over concepts not pertaining to agents, but this was true only for expectation-violating concepts. Our results imply that intuitive, everyday concepts are equally attractive and memorable regardless of the presence or absence of agents. However, concepts that violate our expectations (cultural-schema or domain-level) are more memorable when pertaining to agents (humans and animals) than to non-agents (plants or objects/artifacts). We conclude that due to their evolutionary salience, cultural ideas which combine expectancy violations and the involvement of an agent are especially memorable and thus have an enhanced probability of being successfully propagated. © 2014 Porubanova et al.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899573497&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0090684

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0090684

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0090684

M3 - Article

VL - 9

JO - PLoS ONE

JF - PLoS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 4

M1 - e90684

ER -