Mesmerized by enlargement: the EU’s Eastern Neighborhood Policy and New Member State transition experience

Simon Lightfoot, Balázs Szent-Iványi, Kataryna Wolczuk

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The accession of the East-Central European (ECE) countries carried a promise of enhancing and enriching the EU’s Eastern policy. The new member states had the strongest interests among EU member states to ensure that countries in the East are prosperous, stable and democratic. Yet, EU’s Eastern policy has been largely criticised for its ineffectiveness. So why have they not been able to address the shortcomings in the EU’s Eastern policies? The article argues that the ECE countries supported the way the EU’s Eastern policies were conceived and implemented because they saw it as a potent vehicle to promote their own transition experience not only in the region but also within the EU. We argue that the ECE states have experienced three types of challenges when promoting their transition experience. First, uploading to the EU level remained largely at a rhetorical level. Second, there are conceptual and practical difficulties in defining what constitutes transition experience and harnessing it, as well as coordinating its transfer between the ECE states. Finally, while using transition experience as the basis for their development assistance strategies, the ECE countries actually insufficiently conceptualised the ‘development’ aspect in these policies. Being so driven by their own experience, they have not drawn the lessons from enlargement to use in a non-accession context, especially by incorporating the broader lessons with regard to development.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)664-684
Number of pages21
JournalEast European Politics and Societies
Volume30
Issue number3
Early online date19 Feb 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Aug 2016

Fingerprint

neighborhood policy
EU
experience
EU member state
assistance

Bibliographical note

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Funding: ESRC (RES-360–5–096).

Keywords

  • East-Central Europe
  • transition experience
  • European neighborhood policy
  • post-Soviet states

Cite this

@article{2bc6fa94ff464e01bb4d5cd1276c42fe,
title = "Mesmerized by enlargement: the EU’s Eastern Neighborhood Policy and New Member State transition experience",
abstract = "The accession of the East-Central European (ECE) countries carried a promise of enhancing and enriching the EU’s Eastern policy. The new member states had the strongest interests among EU member states to ensure that countries in the East are prosperous, stable and democratic. Yet, EU’s Eastern policy has been largely criticised for its ineffectiveness. So why have they not been able to address the shortcomings in the EU’s Eastern policies? The article argues that the ECE countries supported the way the EU’s Eastern policies were conceived and implemented because they saw it as a potent vehicle to promote their own transition experience not only in the region but also within the EU. We argue that the ECE states have experienced three types of challenges when promoting their transition experience. First, uploading to the EU level remained largely at a rhetorical level. Second, there are conceptual and practical difficulties in defining what constitutes transition experience and harnessing it, as well as coordinating its transfer between the ECE states. Finally, while using transition experience as the basis for their development assistance strategies, the ECE countries actually insufficiently conceptualised the ‘development’ aspect in these policies. Being so driven by their own experience, they have not drawn the lessons from enlargement to use in a non-accession context, especially by incorporating the broader lessons with regard to development.",
keywords = "East-Central Europe, transition experience, European neighborhood policy, post-Soviet states",
author = "Simon Lightfoot and Bal{\'a}zs Szent-Iv{\'a}nyi and Kataryna Wolczuk",
note = "This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). Funding: ESRC (RES-360–5–096).",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1177/0888325416632041",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "664--684",
journal = "East European Politics and Societies",
issn = "0888-3254",
publisher = "SAGE",
number = "3",

}

Mesmerized by enlargement : the EU’s Eastern Neighborhood Policy and New Member State transition experience. / Lightfoot, Simon; Szent-Iványi, Balázs; Wolczuk, Kataryna.

In: East European Politics and Societies, Vol. 30, No. 3, 08.2016, p. 664-684.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mesmerized by enlargement

T2 - the EU’s Eastern Neighborhood Policy and New Member State transition experience

AU - Lightfoot, Simon

AU - Szent-Iványi, Balázs

AU - Wolczuk, Kataryna

N1 - This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). Funding: ESRC (RES-360–5–096).

PY - 2016/8

Y1 - 2016/8

N2 - The accession of the East-Central European (ECE) countries carried a promise of enhancing and enriching the EU’s Eastern policy. The new member states had the strongest interests among EU member states to ensure that countries in the East are prosperous, stable and democratic. Yet, EU’s Eastern policy has been largely criticised for its ineffectiveness. So why have they not been able to address the shortcomings in the EU’s Eastern policies? The article argues that the ECE countries supported the way the EU’s Eastern policies were conceived and implemented because they saw it as a potent vehicle to promote their own transition experience not only in the region but also within the EU. We argue that the ECE states have experienced three types of challenges when promoting their transition experience. First, uploading to the EU level remained largely at a rhetorical level. Second, there are conceptual and practical difficulties in defining what constitutes transition experience and harnessing it, as well as coordinating its transfer between the ECE states. Finally, while using transition experience as the basis for their development assistance strategies, the ECE countries actually insufficiently conceptualised the ‘development’ aspect in these policies. Being so driven by their own experience, they have not drawn the lessons from enlargement to use in a non-accession context, especially by incorporating the broader lessons with regard to development.

AB - The accession of the East-Central European (ECE) countries carried a promise of enhancing and enriching the EU’s Eastern policy. The new member states had the strongest interests among EU member states to ensure that countries in the East are prosperous, stable and democratic. Yet, EU’s Eastern policy has been largely criticised for its ineffectiveness. So why have they not been able to address the shortcomings in the EU’s Eastern policies? The article argues that the ECE countries supported the way the EU’s Eastern policies were conceived and implemented because they saw it as a potent vehicle to promote their own transition experience not only in the region but also within the EU. We argue that the ECE states have experienced three types of challenges when promoting their transition experience. First, uploading to the EU level remained largely at a rhetorical level. Second, there are conceptual and practical difficulties in defining what constitutes transition experience and harnessing it, as well as coordinating its transfer between the ECE states. Finally, while using transition experience as the basis for their development assistance strategies, the ECE countries actually insufficiently conceptualised the ‘development’ aspect in these policies. Being so driven by their own experience, they have not drawn the lessons from enlargement to use in a non-accession context, especially by incorporating the broader lessons with regard to development.

KW - East-Central Europe

KW - transition experience

KW - European neighborhood policy

KW - post-Soviet states

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0888325416632041

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84978427658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0888325416632041

DO - 10.1177/0888325416632041

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84978427658

VL - 30

SP - 664

EP - 684

JO - East European Politics and Societies

JF - East European Politics and Societies

SN - 0888-3254

IS - 3

ER -