Metaphors in Hugo Chávez's political discourse: conceptualizing nation, revolution and opposition

Marco A Aponte Moreno

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

Abstract

This dissertation examines Hugo Chávez's choice of metaphors in his efforts to construct and legitimize his Bolivarian Revolution. It focuses on metaphors drawn from three of the most frequent target domains present in his discourse: the nation, his revolution, and the opposition. The study argues that behind an official discourse of inclusion, Chávez's choice of metaphors contributes to the construction of a polarizing discourse of exclusion in which his political opponents are represented as enemies of the nation.The study shows that Chávez constructs this polarizing discourse of exclusion by combining metaphors that conceptualize: (a) the nation as a person who has been resurrected by his government, as a person ready to fight for his revolution, or as Chávez himself; (b) the revolution as war; and (c) members of the opposition as war combatants or criminals. At the same time, the study shows that by making explicit references in his discourse about the revolution as the continuation of Bolívar's wars of independence, Chávez contributes to represent opponents as enemies of the nation, given that in the Venezuelan collective imaginary Simón Bolívar is the symbol of the nation's emancipation.This research, which covers a period of nine years (from Chávez's first year in office in 1999 through 2007), is part of the discipline of Political Discourse Analysis (PDA). It is anchored both in the theoretical framework provided by the cognitive linguistic metaphor theory developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson described in their book Metaphors We Live By, and in Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) as defined by Jonathan Charteris-Black in his book Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis.The study provides the first comprehensive analysis of metaphors used by Chávez in his political discourse. It builds upon the findings of previous studies on political discourse analysis in Venezuela by showing that Chávez's discourse not only polarizes the country and represents opponents as detractors of national symbols such as Bolívar or his wars of independence (which have been clearly established in previous studies), but also represents political opponents as enemies of the nation.
Original languageEnglish
QualificationPh.D.
Awarding Institution
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Political Discourse
Revolution
Discourse
Opponents
Enemy
Person
Symbol
Exclusion
Discourse Analysis
War of Independence
Venezuela
George Lakoff
Theoretical Framework
Inclusion
Government
Mark Johnson
Linguistic Metaphor
Target Domain
Cognitive Linguistics
Emancipation

Bibliographical note

If you have discovered material in Aston Research Explorer which is unlawful e.g. breaches copyright, (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please read our Takedown Policy and contact the service immediately.

Keywords

  • Hugo Chávez
  • metaphors
  • revolution
  • polarization
  • conceptualization
  • Simon Bolivar
  • cognitive linguistic metaphor theory
  • Mark Johnson
  • ctitical metaphor analysis
  • corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis
  • Bolivarian Revolution
  • nation
  • opposition
  • polarizing discourse
  • Venezuelan
  • political discourse analysis
  • George Lakoff
  • metaphors we live by
  • Johnathan Charteis-Black

Cite this

@phdthesis{1f1b3d5ea61a45bb8f083d992a1a109c,
title = "Metaphors in Hugo Ch{\'a}vez's political discourse: conceptualizing nation, revolution and opposition",
abstract = "This dissertation examines Hugo Ch{\'a}vez's choice of metaphors in his efforts to construct and legitimize his Bolivarian Revolution. It focuses on metaphors drawn from three of the most frequent target domains present in his discourse: the nation, his revolution, and the opposition. The study argues that behind an official discourse of inclusion, Ch{\'a}vez's choice of metaphors contributes to the construction of a polarizing discourse of exclusion in which his political opponents are represented as enemies of the nation.The study shows that Ch{\'a}vez constructs this polarizing discourse of exclusion by combining metaphors that conceptualize: (a) the nation as a person who has been resurrected by his government, as a person ready to fight for his revolution, or as Ch{\'a}vez himself; (b) the revolution as war; and (c) members of the opposition as war combatants or criminals. At the same time, the study shows that by making explicit references in his discourse about the revolution as the continuation of Bol{\'i}var's wars of independence, Ch{\'a}vez contributes to represent opponents as enemies of the nation, given that in the Venezuelan collective imaginary Sim{\'o}n Bol{\'i}var is the symbol of the nation's emancipation.This research, which covers a period of nine years (from Ch{\'a}vez's first year in office in 1999 through 2007), is part of the discipline of Political Discourse Analysis (PDA). It is anchored both in the theoretical framework provided by the cognitive linguistic metaphor theory developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson described in their book Metaphors We Live By, and in Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) as defined by Jonathan Charteris-Black in his book Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis.The study provides the first comprehensive analysis of metaphors used by Ch{\'a}vez in his political discourse. It builds upon the findings of previous studies on political discourse analysis in Venezuela by showing that Ch{\'a}vez's discourse not only polarizes the country and represents opponents as detractors of national symbols such as Bol{\'i}var or his wars of independence (which have been clearly established in previous studies), but also represents political opponents as enemies of the nation.",
keywords = "Hugo Ch{\'a}vez, metaphors, revolution, polarization, conceptualization, Simon Bolivar, cognitive linguistic metaphor theory, Mark Johnson, ctitical metaphor analysis, corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis, Bolivarian Revolution, nation, opposition, polarizing discourse, Venezuelan, political discourse analysis, George Lakoff, metaphors we live by, Johnathan Charteis-Black",
author = "{Aponte Moreno}, {Marco A}",
note = "If you have discovered material in Aston Research Explorer which is unlawful e.g. breaches copyright, (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please read our Takedown Policy and contact the service immediately.",
year = "2008",
language = "English",

}

Metaphors in Hugo Chávez's political discourse : conceptualizing nation, revolution and opposition. / Aponte Moreno, Marco A.

2008.

Research output: ThesisDoctoral Thesis

TY - THES

T1 - Metaphors in Hugo Chávez's political discourse

T2 - conceptualizing nation, revolution and opposition

AU - Aponte Moreno, Marco A

N1 - If you have discovered material in Aston Research Explorer which is unlawful e.g. breaches copyright, (either yours or that of a third party) or any other law, including but not limited to those relating to patent, trademark, confidentiality, data protection, obscenity, defamation, libel, then please read our Takedown Policy and contact the service immediately.

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - This dissertation examines Hugo Chávez's choice of metaphors in his efforts to construct and legitimize his Bolivarian Revolution. It focuses on metaphors drawn from three of the most frequent target domains present in his discourse: the nation, his revolution, and the opposition. The study argues that behind an official discourse of inclusion, Chávez's choice of metaphors contributes to the construction of a polarizing discourse of exclusion in which his political opponents are represented as enemies of the nation.The study shows that Chávez constructs this polarizing discourse of exclusion by combining metaphors that conceptualize: (a) the nation as a person who has been resurrected by his government, as a person ready to fight for his revolution, or as Chávez himself; (b) the revolution as war; and (c) members of the opposition as war combatants or criminals. At the same time, the study shows that by making explicit references in his discourse about the revolution as the continuation of Bolívar's wars of independence, Chávez contributes to represent opponents as enemies of the nation, given that in the Venezuelan collective imaginary Simón Bolívar is the symbol of the nation's emancipation.This research, which covers a period of nine years (from Chávez's first year in office in 1999 through 2007), is part of the discipline of Political Discourse Analysis (PDA). It is anchored both in the theoretical framework provided by the cognitive linguistic metaphor theory developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson described in their book Metaphors We Live By, and in Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) as defined by Jonathan Charteris-Black in his book Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis.The study provides the first comprehensive analysis of metaphors used by Chávez in his political discourse. It builds upon the findings of previous studies on political discourse analysis in Venezuela by showing that Chávez's discourse not only polarizes the country and represents opponents as detractors of national symbols such as Bolívar or his wars of independence (which have been clearly established in previous studies), but also represents political opponents as enemies of the nation.

AB - This dissertation examines Hugo Chávez's choice of metaphors in his efforts to construct and legitimize his Bolivarian Revolution. It focuses on metaphors drawn from three of the most frequent target domains present in his discourse: the nation, his revolution, and the opposition. The study argues that behind an official discourse of inclusion, Chávez's choice of metaphors contributes to the construction of a polarizing discourse of exclusion in which his political opponents are represented as enemies of the nation.The study shows that Chávez constructs this polarizing discourse of exclusion by combining metaphors that conceptualize: (a) the nation as a person who has been resurrected by his government, as a person ready to fight for his revolution, or as Chávez himself; (b) the revolution as war; and (c) members of the opposition as war combatants or criminals. At the same time, the study shows that by making explicit references in his discourse about the revolution as the continuation of Bolívar's wars of independence, Chávez contributes to represent opponents as enemies of the nation, given that in the Venezuelan collective imaginary Simón Bolívar is the symbol of the nation's emancipation.This research, which covers a period of nine years (from Chávez's first year in office in 1999 through 2007), is part of the discipline of Political Discourse Analysis (PDA). It is anchored both in the theoretical framework provided by the cognitive linguistic metaphor theory developed by George Lakoff and Mark Johnson described in their book Metaphors We Live By, and in Critical Metaphor Analysis (CMA) as defined by Jonathan Charteris-Black in his book Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis.The study provides the first comprehensive analysis of metaphors used by Chávez in his political discourse. It builds upon the findings of previous studies on political discourse analysis in Venezuela by showing that Chávez's discourse not only polarizes the country and represents opponents as detractors of national symbols such as Bolívar or his wars of independence (which have been clearly established in previous studies), but also represents political opponents as enemies of the nation.

KW - Hugo Chávez

KW - metaphors

KW - revolution

KW - polarization

KW - conceptualization

KW - Simon Bolivar

KW - cognitive linguistic metaphor theory

KW - Mark Johnson

KW - ctitical metaphor analysis

KW - corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis

KW - Bolivarian Revolution

KW - nation

KW - opposition

KW - polarizing discourse

KW - Venezuelan

KW - political discourse analysis

KW - George Lakoff

KW - metaphors we live by

KW - Johnathan Charteis-Black

M3 - Doctoral Thesis

ER -