TY - GEN
T1 - Motivating students to learn through good and helpful coursework feedback
AU - Wong, Sylvia Ha Sylvia
N1 - Copyright belongs to The Higher Education Academy. This material may be freely distributed and copied for educational purposes only, provided that appropriate acknowledgement is given to the Higher Education Academy as the copyright holder and original publisher.
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - The 2008 National Student Survey revealed that: 44% of full-time students in England did not think that the feedback on their work had been prompt nor did they agree that the feedback on their work helped them clarify things that they did not understand (HEFCE, 2008). Computer Science and Engineering & Technology have been amongst the poorest performers in this aspect as they ranked in the lower quartile (Surridge, 2007, p.32). Five years since the first NSS survey, assessment and feedback remains the biggest concern. Dissatisfaction in any aspect of studies demotivates students and can lead to disengagement and attrition. As the student number grows, the situation can only get worse if nothing is done about it.
We have conducted a survey to investigate views on assessment and feedback from Engineering, Mathematics and Computing students. The survey aims at investigating the core issues of dissatisfaction in assessment and feedback and ways in which UK Engineering students can learn better through helpful feedback. The study focuses on collecting students' experiences with feedback received in their coursework, assignments and quizzes in Computing Science modules. The survey reveals the role of feedback in their learning. The results of the survey help to identify the forms of feedback that are considered to be helpful in learning and the time frame for timely feedback. We
report on the findings of the survey. We also explore ways to improve assessment and feedback in a bid to better engage engineering students in their studies.
AB - The 2008 National Student Survey revealed that: 44% of full-time students in England did not think that the feedback on their work had been prompt nor did they agree that the feedback on their work helped them clarify things that they did not understand (HEFCE, 2008). Computer Science and Engineering & Technology have been amongst the poorest performers in this aspect as they ranked in the lower quartile (Surridge, 2007, p.32). Five years since the first NSS survey, assessment and feedback remains the biggest concern. Dissatisfaction in any aspect of studies demotivates students and can lead to disengagement and attrition. As the student number grows, the situation can only get worse if nothing is done about it.
We have conducted a survey to investigate views on assessment and feedback from Engineering, Mathematics and Computing students. The survey aims at investigating the core issues of dissatisfaction in assessment and feedback and ways in which UK Engineering students can learn better through helpful feedback. The study focuses on collecting students' experiences with feedback received in their coursework, assignments and quizzes in Computing Science modules. The survey reveals the role of feedback in their learning. The results of the survey help to identify the forms of feedback that are considered to be helpful in learning and the time frame for timely feedback. We
report on the findings of the survey. We also explore ways to improve assessment and feedback in a bid to better engage engineering students in their studies.
KW - coursework assessment and feedback
KW - learning experience
KW - computer Science
KW - eCAF
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857677449&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.engsc.ac.uk/downloads/scholarart/ee2010/26_GP_Wong.pdf
M3 - Conference publication
BT - Proceedings of Engineering Education Conference 2010 (EE2010)
T2 - Engineering Education 2010
Y2 - 6 July 2010 through 8 July 2010
ER -