Navigating the Uncertainties of Post‐disruption Dynamics in Discourse: A Case Study of the EU–UK Security Relationship After Brexit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The article presents a model that conceptualizes the discursive construction of post‐disruption dynamics endorsed and reproduced by the affected parties and its potential to (not) contribute to future co‐operation. Conceiving of Brexit as a prime case of a broader phenomenon of post‐disruption contexts, this paper applies this model to the empirical case of the post‐Brexit European Union (EU)–United Kingdom (UK) security co‐operation in order to reveal how considerations on Brexit‐related re‐engagement and de‐engagement in the context of the EU–UK security relationship were discursively articulated by the UK government and the European Commission in the 2016–2023 period. The findings show that despite the lack of tangible actions and a seemingly continuous string of missed opportunities, the institutional discourse production has largely fulfilled an enabling function vis‐à‐vis potential future co‐operation. At the same time, this article highlights the lingering effects of Brexit‐triggered discord.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)354-370
Number of pages17
JournalJournal of Common Market Studies
Volume64
Issue number1
Early online date13 Aug 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Aug 2024

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.

Funding

Open access publishing facilitated by Masarykova univerzita, as part of the Wiley ‐ CzechELib agreement

Keywords

  • Brexit
  • discourse
  • post-disruption
  • re-engagement
  • security

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Navigating the Uncertainties of Post‐disruption Dynamics in Discourse: A Case Study of the EU–UK Security Relationship After Brexit'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this