Neuroscience and family policy: what becomes of the parent?

Jan Macvarish*, Ellie Lee, Pam Lowe

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This article discusses the findings of a study tracing the incorporation of claims about infant brain development into English family policy as part of the longer term development of a ‘parent training’, early intervention agenda. The main focus is on the ways in which the deployment of neuroscientific discourse in family policy creates the basis for a new governmental oversight of parents. We argue that advocacy of ‘early intervention’, in particular that which deploys the authority of ‘the neuroscience’, places parents at the centre of the policy stage but simultaneously demotes and marginalises them. So we ask, what becomes of the parent when politically and culturally, the child is spoken of as infinitely and permanently neurologically vulnerable to parental influence? In particular, the policy focus on parental emotions and their impact on infant brain development indicates that this represents a biologisation of ‘therapeutic’ governance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-269
Number of pages22
JournalCritical Social Policy
Volume35
Issue number2
Early online date26 Feb 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2015

Fingerprint

family policy
neurosciences
parents
infant
brain
parents training
emotion
governance
discourse

Bibliographical note

© Sage 2015. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018315574019

Keywords

  • early intervention
  • family policy
  • neuroscience
  • parenting
  • therapy culture

Cite this

Macvarish, Jan ; Lee, Ellie ; Lowe, Pam. / Neuroscience and family policy : what becomes of the parent?. In: Critical Social Policy. 2015 ; Vol. 35, No. 2. pp. 248-269.
@article{92017e8313a944b2a13224d1b8ece5d0,
title = "Neuroscience and family policy: what becomes of the parent?",
abstract = "This article discusses the findings of a study tracing the incorporation of claims about infant brain development into English family policy as part of the longer term development of a ‘parent training’, early intervention agenda. The main focus is on the ways in which the deployment of neuroscientific discourse in family policy creates the basis for a new governmental oversight of parents. We argue that advocacy of ‘early intervention’, in particular that which deploys the authority of ‘the neuroscience’, places parents at the centre of the policy stage but simultaneously demotes and marginalises them. So we ask, what becomes of the parent when politically and culturally, the child is spoken of as infinitely and permanently neurologically vulnerable to parental influence? In particular, the policy focus on parental emotions and their impact on infant brain development indicates that this represents a biologisation of ‘therapeutic’ governance.",
keywords = "early intervention, family policy, neuroscience, parenting, therapy culture",
author = "Jan Macvarish and Ellie Lee and Pam Lowe",
note = "{\circledC} Sage 2015. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018315574019",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0261018315574019",
language = "English",
volume = "35",
pages = "248--269",
journal = "Critical Social Policy",
issn = "0261-0183",
publisher = "SAGE",
number = "2",

}

Neuroscience and family policy : what becomes of the parent? / Macvarish, Jan; Lee, Ellie; Lowe, Pam.

In: Critical Social Policy, Vol. 35, No. 2, 01.05.2015, p. 248-269.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neuroscience and family policy

T2 - what becomes of the parent?

AU - Macvarish, Jan

AU - Lee, Ellie

AU - Lowe, Pam

N1 - © Sage 2015. The final publication is available via Sage at http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0261018315574019

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - This article discusses the findings of a study tracing the incorporation of claims about infant brain development into English family policy as part of the longer term development of a ‘parent training’, early intervention agenda. The main focus is on the ways in which the deployment of neuroscientific discourse in family policy creates the basis for a new governmental oversight of parents. We argue that advocacy of ‘early intervention’, in particular that which deploys the authority of ‘the neuroscience’, places parents at the centre of the policy stage but simultaneously demotes and marginalises them. So we ask, what becomes of the parent when politically and culturally, the child is spoken of as infinitely and permanently neurologically vulnerable to parental influence? In particular, the policy focus on parental emotions and their impact on infant brain development indicates that this represents a biologisation of ‘therapeutic’ governance.

AB - This article discusses the findings of a study tracing the incorporation of claims about infant brain development into English family policy as part of the longer term development of a ‘parent training’, early intervention agenda. The main focus is on the ways in which the deployment of neuroscientific discourse in family policy creates the basis for a new governmental oversight of parents. We argue that advocacy of ‘early intervention’, in particular that which deploys the authority of ‘the neuroscience’, places parents at the centre of the policy stage but simultaneously demotes and marginalises them. So we ask, what becomes of the parent when politically and culturally, the child is spoken of as infinitely and permanently neurologically vulnerable to parental influence? In particular, the policy focus on parental emotions and their impact on infant brain development indicates that this represents a biologisation of ‘therapeutic’ governance.

KW - early intervention

KW - family policy

KW - neuroscience

KW - parenting

KW - therapy culture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924975207&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0261018315574019

U2 - 10.1177/0261018315574019

DO - 10.1177/0261018315574019

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84924975207

VL - 35

SP - 248

EP - 269

JO - Critical Social Policy

JF - Critical Social Policy

SN - 0261-0183

IS - 2

ER -