Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast

Daniel Baker, Stuart Wallis, Mark A Georgeson, Timothy S Meese

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

We studied the rules by which visual responses to luminous targets are combined across the two eyes. Previous work has found very different forms of binocular combination for targets defined by increments and by decrements of luminance, with decrement data implying a severe nonlinearity before binocular combination. We ask whether this difference is due to the luminance of the target, the luminance of the background, or the sign of the luminance excursion. We estimated the pre-binocular nonlinearity (power exponent) by fitting a computational model to ocular equibrightness matches. The severity of the nonlinearity had a monotonic dependence on the signed difference between target and background luminance. For dual targets, in which there was both a luminance increment and a luminance decrement (e.g. contrast), perception was governed largely by the decrement. The asymmetry in the nonlinearities derived from the subjective matching data made a clear prediction for visual performance: there should be more binocular summation for detecting luminance increments than for detecting luminance decrements. This prediction was confirmed by the results of a subsequent experiment. We discuss the relation between these results and luminance nonlinearities such as a logarithmic transform, as well as the involvement of contemporary model architectures of binocular vision.
LanguageEnglish
Pages1-9
Number of pages9
JournalVision Research
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2012

Fingerprint

Binocular Vision
Power (Psychology)

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vision research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Baker, Daniel; Wallis, Stuart; Georgeson, Mark A and Meese, Timothy S (2012). Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast. Vision research, 56 (1), pp. 1-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.008

Keywords

  • binocular vision
  • luminance
  • contrast
  • matching
  • binocular summation

Cite this

@article{95f33c8f5d7947d88a5fcd4338debf65,
title = "Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast",
abstract = "We studied the rules by which visual responses to luminous targets are combined across the two eyes. Previous work has found very different forms of binocular combination for targets defined by increments and by decrements of luminance, with decrement data implying a severe nonlinearity before binocular combination. We ask whether this difference is due to the luminance of the target, the luminance of the background, or the sign of the luminance excursion. We estimated the pre-binocular nonlinearity (power exponent) by fitting a computational model to ocular equibrightness matches. The severity of the nonlinearity had a monotonic dependence on the signed difference between target and background luminance. For dual targets, in which there was both a luminance increment and a luminance decrement (e.g. contrast), perception was governed largely by the decrement. The asymmetry in the nonlinearities derived from the subjective matching data made a clear prediction for visual performance: there should be more binocular summation for detecting luminance increments than for detecting luminance decrements. This prediction was confirmed by the results of a subsequent experiment. We discuss the relation between these results and luminance nonlinearities such as a logarithmic transform, as well as the involvement of contemporary model architectures of binocular vision.",
keywords = "binocular vision, luminance, contrast, matching, binocular summation",
author = "Daniel Baker and Stuart Wallis and Georgeson, {Mark A} and Meese, {Timothy S}",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vision research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Baker, Daniel; Wallis, Stuart; Georgeson, Mark A and Meese, Timothy S (2012). Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast. Vision research, 56 (1), pp. 1-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.008",
year = "2012",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.008",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "1--9",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast. / Baker, Daniel; Wallis, Stuart; Georgeson, Mark A; Meese, Timothy S.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 56, No. 1, 01.03.2012, p. 1-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast

AU - Baker, Daniel

AU - Wallis, Stuart

AU - Georgeson, Mark A

AU - Meese, Timothy S

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vision research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Baker, Daniel; Wallis, Stuart; Georgeson, Mark A and Meese, Timothy S (2012). Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast. Vision research, 56 (1), pp. 1-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.008

PY - 2012/3/1

Y1 - 2012/3/1

N2 - We studied the rules by which visual responses to luminous targets are combined across the two eyes. Previous work has found very different forms of binocular combination for targets defined by increments and by decrements of luminance, with decrement data implying a severe nonlinearity before binocular combination. We ask whether this difference is due to the luminance of the target, the luminance of the background, or the sign of the luminance excursion. We estimated the pre-binocular nonlinearity (power exponent) by fitting a computational model to ocular equibrightness matches. The severity of the nonlinearity had a monotonic dependence on the signed difference between target and background luminance. For dual targets, in which there was both a luminance increment and a luminance decrement (e.g. contrast), perception was governed largely by the decrement. The asymmetry in the nonlinearities derived from the subjective matching data made a clear prediction for visual performance: there should be more binocular summation for detecting luminance increments than for detecting luminance decrements. This prediction was confirmed by the results of a subsequent experiment. We discuss the relation between these results and luminance nonlinearities such as a logarithmic transform, as well as the involvement of contemporary model architectures of binocular vision.

AB - We studied the rules by which visual responses to luminous targets are combined across the two eyes. Previous work has found very different forms of binocular combination for targets defined by increments and by decrements of luminance, with decrement data implying a severe nonlinearity before binocular combination. We ask whether this difference is due to the luminance of the target, the luminance of the background, or the sign of the luminance excursion. We estimated the pre-binocular nonlinearity (power exponent) by fitting a computational model to ocular equibrightness matches. The severity of the nonlinearity had a monotonic dependence on the signed difference between target and background luminance. For dual targets, in which there was both a luminance increment and a luminance decrement (e.g. contrast), perception was governed largely by the decrement. The asymmetry in the nonlinearities derived from the subjective matching data made a clear prediction for visual performance: there should be more binocular summation for detecting luminance increments than for detecting luminance decrements. This prediction was confirmed by the results of a subsequent experiment. We discuss the relation between these results and luminance nonlinearities such as a logarithmic transform, as well as the involvement of contemporary model architectures of binocular vision.

KW - binocular vision

KW - luminance

KW - contrast

KW - matching

KW - binocular summation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84856609833&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2012.01.008

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 1

EP - 9

JO - Vision Research

T2 - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 1

ER -