Numerical modeling of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement and corresponding validation using large-scale tank test

Fan Gu*, Xue Luo, Rong Luo, Robert L. Lytton, Elie Y. Hajj, Raj V. Siddharthan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study aimed to develop a finite element model to simulate the geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement structure by taking into account the lateral confinement effect of geogrid layer, the interaction between geogrid and aggregate/soil, and the nonlinear cross-anisotropy of geogrid-reinforced unbound granular material (UGM). First, an analytical model was proposed to quantify the effect of the lateral confinement of geogrid layer on the resilient modulus of UGM. By comparing to the laboratory triaxial test results, the developed analytical model was proven to accurately predict the resilient modulus of geogrid-reinforced UGM. Second, the Goodman interface element model was used to characterize the contact behavior of geogrid-aggregate/soil interface. In order to simulate the nonlinear cross-anisotropic behavior of geogrid-reinforced UGM, a user-defined material (UMAT) subroutine was programmed using the secant modulus approach. The accuracy of the developed UMAT was verified by comparing the numerical simulation results to the analytical solutions in a virtual triaxial test. Two pairs of geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced pavement models were analyzed in this study. It was found that the geogrid reinforcement is effective in mitigating the rutting damage of base course and subgrade, but cannot significantly extend the fatigue life of flexible pavement. The geogrid reinforced in the middle of the base course is better at reducing the rutting damage of base course than that placed at the base/subgrade interface. However, the geogrid reinforcement is much more effective in reducing the rutting damage of the subgrade when it is placed at the bottom of the base course. A comprehensive large-scale tank (LST) testing program was designed to record the critical pavement responses, including the surface deflection, the tensile strain at the bottom of the asphalt concrete, and the vertical stresses in base course and subgrade. The developed geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced finite element models were finally validated by comparing the model predictions with those measurements from the LST test.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)214-230
Number of pages17
JournalConstruction and Building Materials
Volume122
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sep 2016

Fingerprint

Pavements
Granular materials
Analytical models
Reinforcement
Soils
Asphalt concrete
Tensile strain
Subroutines
Anisotropy
Fatigue of materials
Computer simulation
Testing

Keywords

  • Cross-anisotropy
  • Finite element model
  • Geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement
  • Large-scale tank test

Cite this

Gu, Fan ; Luo, Xue ; Luo, Rong ; Lytton, Robert L. ; Hajj, Elie Y. ; Siddharthan, Raj V. / Numerical modeling of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement and corresponding validation using large-scale tank test. In: Construction and Building Materials. 2016 ; Vol. 122. pp. 214-230.
@article{7ac1729e7ba7479c8bd63ca099675c77,
title = "Numerical modeling of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement and corresponding validation using large-scale tank test",
abstract = "This study aimed to develop a finite element model to simulate the geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement structure by taking into account the lateral confinement effect of geogrid layer, the interaction between geogrid and aggregate/soil, and the nonlinear cross-anisotropy of geogrid-reinforced unbound granular material (UGM). First, an analytical model was proposed to quantify the effect of the lateral confinement of geogrid layer on the resilient modulus of UGM. By comparing to the laboratory triaxial test results, the developed analytical model was proven to accurately predict the resilient modulus of geogrid-reinforced UGM. Second, the Goodman interface element model was used to characterize the contact behavior of geogrid-aggregate/soil interface. In order to simulate the nonlinear cross-anisotropic behavior of geogrid-reinforced UGM, a user-defined material (UMAT) subroutine was programmed using the secant modulus approach. The accuracy of the developed UMAT was verified by comparing the numerical simulation results to the analytical solutions in a virtual triaxial test. Two pairs of geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced pavement models were analyzed in this study. It was found that the geogrid reinforcement is effective in mitigating the rutting damage of base course and subgrade, but cannot significantly extend the fatigue life of flexible pavement. The geogrid reinforced in the middle of the base course is better at reducing the rutting damage of base course than that placed at the base/subgrade interface. However, the geogrid reinforcement is much more effective in reducing the rutting damage of the subgrade when it is placed at the bottom of the base course. A comprehensive large-scale tank (LST) testing program was designed to record the critical pavement responses, including the surface deflection, the tensile strain at the bottom of the asphalt concrete, and the vertical stresses in base course and subgrade. The developed geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced finite element models were finally validated by comparing the model predictions with those measurements from the LST test.",
keywords = "Cross-anisotropy, Finite element model, Geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement, Large-scale tank test",
author = "Fan Gu and Xue Luo and Rong Luo and Lytton, {Robert L.} and Hajj, {Elie Y.} and Siddharthan, {Raj V.}",
year = "2016",
month = "9",
day = "30",
doi = "10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.081",
language = "English",
volume = "122",
pages = "214--230",
journal = "Construction and Building Materials",
issn = "0950-0618",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Numerical modeling of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement and corresponding validation using large-scale tank test. / Gu, Fan; Luo, Xue; Luo, Rong; Lytton, Robert L.; Hajj, Elie Y.; Siddharthan, Raj V.

In: Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 122, 30.09.2016, p. 214-230.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical modeling of geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement and corresponding validation using large-scale tank test

AU - Gu, Fan

AU - Luo, Xue

AU - Luo, Rong

AU - Lytton, Robert L.

AU - Hajj, Elie Y.

AU - Siddharthan, Raj V.

PY - 2016/9/30

Y1 - 2016/9/30

N2 - This study aimed to develop a finite element model to simulate the geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement structure by taking into account the lateral confinement effect of geogrid layer, the interaction between geogrid and aggregate/soil, and the nonlinear cross-anisotropy of geogrid-reinforced unbound granular material (UGM). First, an analytical model was proposed to quantify the effect of the lateral confinement of geogrid layer on the resilient modulus of UGM. By comparing to the laboratory triaxial test results, the developed analytical model was proven to accurately predict the resilient modulus of geogrid-reinforced UGM. Second, the Goodman interface element model was used to characterize the contact behavior of geogrid-aggregate/soil interface. In order to simulate the nonlinear cross-anisotropic behavior of geogrid-reinforced UGM, a user-defined material (UMAT) subroutine was programmed using the secant modulus approach. The accuracy of the developed UMAT was verified by comparing the numerical simulation results to the analytical solutions in a virtual triaxial test. Two pairs of geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced pavement models were analyzed in this study. It was found that the geogrid reinforcement is effective in mitigating the rutting damage of base course and subgrade, but cannot significantly extend the fatigue life of flexible pavement. The geogrid reinforced in the middle of the base course is better at reducing the rutting damage of base course than that placed at the base/subgrade interface. However, the geogrid reinforcement is much more effective in reducing the rutting damage of the subgrade when it is placed at the bottom of the base course. A comprehensive large-scale tank (LST) testing program was designed to record the critical pavement responses, including the surface deflection, the tensile strain at the bottom of the asphalt concrete, and the vertical stresses in base course and subgrade. The developed geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced finite element models were finally validated by comparing the model predictions with those measurements from the LST test.

AB - This study aimed to develop a finite element model to simulate the geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement structure by taking into account the lateral confinement effect of geogrid layer, the interaction between geogrid and aggregate/soil, and the nonlinear cross-anisotropy of geogrid-reinforced unbound granular material (UGM). First, an analytical model was proposed to quantify the effect of the lateral confinement of geogrid layer on the resilient modulus of UGM. By comparing to the laboratory triaxial test results, the developed analytical model was proven to accurately predict the resilient modulus of geogrid-reinforced UGM. Second, the Goodman interface element model was used to characterize the contact behavior of geogrid-aggregate/soil interface. In order to simulate the nonlinear cross-anisotropic behavior of geogrid-reinforced UGM, a user-defined material (UMAT) subroutine was programmed using the secant modulus approach. The accuracy of the developed UMAT was verified by comparing the numerical simulation results to the analytical solutions in a virtual triaxial test. Two pairs of geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced pavement models were analyzed in this study. It was found that the geogrid reinforcement is effective in mitigating the rutting damage of base course and subgrade, but cannot significantly extend the fatigue life of flexible pavement. The geogrid reinforced in the middle of the base course is better at reducing the rutting damage of base course than that placed at the base/subgrade interface. However, the geogrid reinforcement is much more effective in reducing the rutting damage of the subgrade when it is placed at the bottom of the base course. A comprehensive large-scale tank (LST) testing program was designed to record the critical pavement responses, including the surface deflection, the tensile strain at the bottom of the asphalt concrete, and the vertical stresses in base course and subgrade. The developed geogrid-reinforced and unreinforced finite element models were finally validated by comparing the model predictions with those measurements from the LST test.

KW - Cross-anisotropy

KW - Finite element model

KW - Geogrid-reinforced flexible pavement

KW - Large-scale tank test

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84989881718&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061816310091?via%3Dihub

U2 - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.081

DO - 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.081

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84989881718

VL - 122

SP - 214

EP - 230

JO - Construction and Building Materials

JF - Construction and Building Materials

SN - 0950-0618

ER -