Abstract
This chapter explains the development of an app that is designed to assist microentities to address commercial contract legal risk. Micro-entities are the smallest of small enterprises. The impetus to undertake the production of this artefact stems from the need to address the lack of available legal risk management (LRM) advice tools for them. Micro-entities have significant problems when dealing with trading problems arising from the purchase or sale of goods or services between an individual and the business or with another business and constitute more than half the legal problems they face. It is in this spirit that Online Legal Risk Advisory Service (OLRAS) was developed. It follows the
lines of a 1980s legal expert system using Prolog and “if-then” rules. Some preliminary insights which need to be confirmed by beta testing indicate the potential of OLRAS to be used as a tool that micro-entities can use to “lawyer up” against larger organisations with sophisticated legal functions. Once this further work is done, OLRAS could assist micro-entities in engaging in self-evaluation of their legal risk exposure in the context of negotiating commercial contracts for the purchase or sale of goods and/or services. As micro-entities cannot afford legal advice and usually enter into commercial agreements with larger enterprises without the benefit of LRM guidance, an app that can help closing this e-justice gap cannot come too soon.
lines of a 1980s legal expert system using Prolog and “if-then” rules. Some preliminary insights which need to be confirmed by beta testing indicate the potential of OLRAS to be used as a tool that micro-entities can use to “lawyer up” against larger organisations with sophisticated legal functions. Once this further work is done, OLRAS could assist micro-entities in engaging in self-evaluation of their legal risk exposure in the context of negotiating commercial contracts for the purchase or sale of goods and/or services. As micro-entities cannot afford legal advice and usually enter into commercial agreements with larger enterprises without the benefit of LRM guidance, an app that can help closing this e-justice gap cannot come too soon.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Liquid Legal – Sustaining the Rule of Law |
| Subtitle of host publication | Artificial Intelligence, E-Justice, and the Cloud |
| Editors | Kai Jacob, Dierk Schindler, Roger Strathausen, Bernhard Waltl |
| Chapter | 4 |
| Pages | 63-93 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9783031785962 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 6 May 2025 |
Publication series
| Name | Law for Professionals |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Springer Cham |
| ISSN (Print) | 2662-141X |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2662-1428 |
Funding
Research funding for the development of OLRAS and subsequent beta testing was provided by Aston University.
Keywords
- Legal Risk Management
- Artificial intelligence (AI)
- Expert Systems
- Micro-Entities
- E-Justice
- OLRAS
- Commercial Contracts
- Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'OLRAS: Closing the E-Justice Gap Faced by “Lawyer-less” Micro-Entities When They Are Negotiating Commercial Contracts Against Larger “Lawyered-Up” Parties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver