On the investment value of sell-side analyst recommendation revisions in the UK

Chen Su*, Hanxiong Zhang, Kenbata Bangassa, Nathan Lael Joseph

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

This study conducts a comprehensive investigation into the investment value of sell-side analyst recommendation revisions in the UK, using a unique dataset from 1995 to 2013. Our rolling window analysis shows that, on average, upgrades fail to generate any significantly positive abnormal returns in any period of time, even before transaction costs. In addition, although downgrades could generate significantly negative abnormal gross returns over some periods of time, these observed significant returns disappear after accounting for transaction costs. Overall, our bootstrapping simulations confirm sell-side analysts’ lack of skill in making valuable up/downward revisions to cover the size of transaction costs, irrespective of whether these revisions are made by high-ranking brokerage houses or not. However, an industry-based analysis shows that, within two high-tech industry sectors, i.e., Health Care and Technology sectors, sell-side analysts possess certain skill in making valuable downgrades over some periods of time and, in particular, such skill is sufficient to offset transaction costs.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)257–293
Number of pages37
JournalReview of quantitative finance and accounting
Volume53
Issue number1
Early online date9 Aug 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2019

Fingerprint

Transaction costs
Analyst recommendations
Sell-side analysts
Simulation
Brokerage
Industry
High-tech industry
Abnormal returns
Ranking
Health technology
Upgrade
Bootstrapping
Healthcare

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Keywords

  • Analyst recommendation revisions
  • Bootstrapping simulations
  • High-ranking brokerage houses
  • Industry
  • Transaction costs

Cite this

@article{d97b4e311b5247fa83f6e28b573fee50,
title = "On the investment value of sell-side analyst recommendation revisions in the UK",
abstract = "This study conducts a comprehensive investigation into the investment value of sell-side analyst recommendation revisions in the UK, using a unique dataset from 1995 to 2013. Our rolling window analysis shows that, on average, upgrades fail to generate any significantly positive abnormal returns in any period of time, even before transaction costs. In addition, although downgrades could generate significantly negative abnormal gross returns over some periods of time, these observed significant returns disappear after accounting for transaction costs. Overall, our bootstrapping simulations confirm sell-side analysts’ lack of skill in making valuable up/downward revisions to cover the size of transaction costs, irrespective of whether these revisions are made by high-ranking brokerage houses or not. However, an industry-based analysis shows that, within two high-tech industry sectors, i.e., Health Care and Technology sectors, sell-side analysts possess certain skill in making valuable downgrades over some periods of time and, in particular, such skill is sufficient to offset transaction costs.",
keywords = "Analyst recommendation revisions, Bootstrapping simulations, High-ranking brokerage houses, Industry, Transaction costs",
author = "Chen Su and Hanxiong Zhang and Kenbata Bangassa and Joseph, {Nathan Lael}",
note = "{\circledC} The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.",
year = "2019",
month = "7",
day = "15",
doi = "10.1007/s11156-018-0749-y",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "257–293",
journal = "Review of quantitative finance and accounting",
issn = "0924-865X",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

On the investment value of sell-side analyst recommendation revisions in the UK. / Su, Chen; Zhang, Hanxiong; Bangassa, Kenbata; Joseph, Nathan Lael.

In: Review of quantitative finance and accounting, Vol. 53, No. 1, 15.07.2019, p. 257–293.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the investment value of sell-side analyst recommendation revisions in the UK

AU - Su, Chen

AU - Zhang, Hanxiong

AU - Bangassa, Kenbata

AU - Joseph, Nathan Lael

N1 - © The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

PY - 2019/7/15

Y1 - 2019/7/15

N2 - This study conducts a comprehensive investigation into the investment value of sell-side analyst recommendation revisions in the UK, using a unique dataset from 1995 to 2013. Our rolling window analysis shows that, on average, upgrades fail to generate any significantly positive abnormal returns in any period of time, even before transaction costs. In addition, although downgrades could generate significantly negative abnormal gross returns over some periods of time, these observed significant returns disappear after accounting for transaction costs. Overall, our bootstrapping simulations confirm sell-side analysts’ lack of skill in making valuable up/downward revisions to cover the size of transaction costs, irrespective of whether these revisions are made by high-ranking brokerage houses or not. However, an industry-based analysis shows that, within two high-tech industry sectors, i.e., Health Care and Technology sectors, sell-side analysts possess certain skill in making valuable downgrades over some periods of time and, in particular, such skill is sufficient to offset transaction costs.

AB - This study conducts a comprehensive investigation into the investment value of sell-side analyst recommendation revisions in the UK, using a unique dataset from 1995 to 2013. Our rolling window analysis shows that, on average, upgrades fail to generate any significantly positive abnormal returns in any period of time, even before transaction costs. In addition, although downgrades could generate significantly negative abnormal gross returns over some periods of time, these observed significant returns disappear after accounting for transaction costs. Overall, our bootstrapping simulations confirm sell-side analysts’ lack of skill in making valuable up/downward revisions to cover the size of transaction costs, irrespective of whether these revisions are made by high-ranking brokerage houses or not. However, an industry-based analysis shows that, within two high-tech industry sectors, i.e., Health Care and Technology sectors, sell-side analysts possess certain skill in making valuable downgrades over some periods of time and, in particular, such skill is sufficient to offset transaction costs.

KW - Analyst recommendation revisions

KW - Bootstrapping simulations

KW - High-ranking brokerage houses

KW - Industry

KW - Transaction costs

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85051682237&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11156-018-0749-y

U2 - 10.1007/s11156-018-0749-y

DO - 10.1007/s11156-018-0749-y

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85051682237

VL - 53

SP - 257

EP - 293

JO - Review of quantitative finance and accounting

JF - Review of quantitative finance and accounting

SN - 0924-865X

IS - 1

ER -