On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry

Daniel H. Baker, Erich W. Graf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

When our two eyes view incompatible images, the brain invokes suppressive processes to inhibit one image, and favor the other. Two phenomena are typically observed: dichoptic masking (reduced sensitivity to one image) for brief presentations, and binocular rivalry (alternation between the two images), over longer exposures. However, it is not clear if these two phenomena arise from a common suppressive process. We investigated this by measuring both threshold elevation in simultaneous dichoptic masking and mean percept durations in rivalry, whilst varying relative stimulus orientation. Masking and rivalry showed significant correlations, such that strong masking was associated with long dominance durations. A second experiment suggested that individual differences across both measures are also correlated. These findings are consistent with varying the magnitude of interocular suppression in computational models of both rivalry and masking, and imply the existence of a common suppressive process. Since dichoptic masking has been localised to the monocular neurons of V1, this is a plausible first stage of binocular rivalry.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)451-9
Number of pages9
JournalVision Research
Volume49
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 20 Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Individuality
Neurons
Brain

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vision Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Baker, Daniel H. and Graf, Erich W. (2009). On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 49 (4), pp. 451-9. DOI 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.002

Keywords

  • dichoptic masking
  • binocular rivalry
  • orientation
  • individual differences
  • interocular suppression

Cite this

Baker, Daniel H. ; Graf, Erich W. / On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. In: Vision Research. 2009 ; Vol. 49, No. 4. pp. 451-9.
@article{3d2c7729c77c4975b880b376d7cbda37,
title = "On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry",
abstract = "When our two eyes view incompatible images, the brain invokes suppressive processes to inhibit one image, and favor the other. Two phenomena are typically observed: dichoptic masking (reduced sensitivity to one image) for brief presentations, and binocular rivalry (alternation between the two images), over longer exposures. However, it is not clear if these two phenomena arise from a common suppressive process. We investigated this by measuring both threshold elevation in simultaneous dichoptic masking and mean percept durations in rivalry, whilst varying relative stimulus orientation. Masking and rivalry showed significant correlations, such that strong masking was associated with long dominance durations. A second experiment suggested that individual differences across both measures are also correlated. These findings are consistent with varying the magnitude of interocular suppression in computational models of both rivalry and masking, and imply the existence of a common suppressive process. Since dichoptic masking has been localised to the monocular neurons of V1, this is a plausible first stage of binocular rivalry.",
keywords = "dichoptic masking, binocular rivalry, orientation, individual differences, interocular suppression",
author = "Baker, {Daniel H.} and Graf, {Erich W.}",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vision Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Baker, Daniel H. and Graf, Erich W. (2009). On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 49 (4), pp. 451-9. DOI 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.002",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "451--9",
journal = "Vision Research",
issn = "0042-6989",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "4",

}

On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. / Baker, Daniel H.; Graf, Erich W.

In: Vision Research, Vol. 49, No. 4, 20.02.2009, p. 451-9.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry

AU - Baker, Daniel H.

AU - Graf, Erich W.

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Vision Research. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Baker, Daniel H. and Graf, Erich W. (2009). On the relation between dichoptic masking and binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 49 (4), pp. 451-9. DOI 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.002

PY - 2009/2/20

Y1 - 2009/2/20

N2 - When our two eyes view incompatible images, the brain invokes suppressive processes to inhibit one image, and favor the other. Two phenomena are typically observed: dichoptic masking (reduced sensitivity to one image) for brief presentations, and binocular rivalry (alternation between the two images), over longer exposures. However, it is not clear if these two phenomena arise from a common suppressive process. We investigated this by measuring both threshold elevation in simultaneous dichoptic masking and mean percept durations in rivalry, whilst varying relative stimulus orientation. Masking and rivalry showed significant correlations, such that strong masking was associated with long dominance durations. A second experiment suggested that individual differences across both measures are also correlated. These findings are consistent with varying the magnitude of interocular suppression in computational models of both rivalry and masking, and imply the existence of a common suppressive process. Since dichoptic masking has been localised to the monocular neurons of V1, this is a plausible first stage of binocular rivalry.

AB - When our two eyes view incompatible images, the brain invokes suppressive processes to inhibit one image, and favor the other. Two phenomena are typically observed: dichoptic masking (reduced sensitivity to one image) for brief presentations, and binocular rivalry (alternation between the two images), over longer exposures. However, it is not clear if these two phenomena arise from a common suppressive process. We investigated this by measuring both threshold elevation in simultaneous dichoptic masking and mean percept durations in rivalry, whilst varying relative stimulus orientation. Masking and rivalry showed significant correlations, such that strong masking was associated with long dominance durations. A second experiment suggested that individual differences across both measures are also correlated. These findings are consistent with varying the magnitude of interocular suppression in computational models of both rivalry and masking, and imply the existence of a common suppressive process. Since dichoptic masking has been localised to the monocular neurons of V1, this is a plausible first stage of binocular rivalry.

KW - dichoptic masking

KW - binocular rivalry

KW - orientation

KW - individual differences

KW - interocular suppression

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60349113909&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.visres.2008.12.002

M3 - Article

VL - 49

SP - 451

EP - 459

JO - Vision Research

JF - Vision Research

SN - 0042-6989

IS - 4

ER -