Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Optimized Implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care

  • Wilfried Mullens
  • , Angelo Auricchio
  • , Pieter Martens
  • , Klaus Witte
  • , Martin R Cowie
  • , Victoria Delgado
  • , Kenneth Dickstein
  • , Cecilia Linde
  • , Kevin Vernooy
  • , Francisco Leyva
  • , Johann Bauersachs
  • , Carsten W Israel
  • , Lars Lund
  • , Erwan Donal
  • , Giuseppe Boriani
  • , Tiny Jaarsma
  • , Antonio Berruezo
  • , Vassil Traykov
  • , Zaheer Yousef
  • , Zbigniew Kalarus
  • Jens Cosedis Nielsen, Jan Steffel, Panos Vardas, Andrew Coats, Petar Seferovic, Thor Edvardsen, Hein Heidbuchel, Frank Ruschitzka, Christophe Leclercq
  • Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg, Genk University Hasselt Hasselt both in Belgium
  • Division of Cardiology Cardiocentro Ticino Lugano Switzerland
  • Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine University of Leeds Leeds UK
  • Imperial College London (Royal Brompton Hospital) London United Kingdom
  • Department of Cardiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden The Netherlands
  • University of Bergen, Stavanger University Hospital Norway
  • Heart and Vascular Theme Karolinska University Hospital and Karolinska Institutet Stockholm Sweden
  • Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht (CARIM), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, and Department of Cardiology Radboud University Medical Center (Radboudumc) Nijmegen both in the Netherlands
  • Department of Cardiology and Angiology Hannover Medical School Hannover Germany
  • Department of Medicine – Cardiology, Diabetology and Nephrology Bethel‐Clinic Bielefeld Germany
  • Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet, and Department of Cardiology Karolinska University Hospital
  • Cardiologie – CHU Rennes – LTSI Inserm UMR 1099 ‐ Université Rennes‐1 Rennes France
  • Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Modena Italy
  • Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands and Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Science Linköping University Sweden
  • Heart Institute, Teknon Medical Center Barcelona Spain
  • Department of Cardiology Acibadem City Clinic Tokuda Hospital Sofia Bulgaria
  • Department of Cardiology University Hospital of Wales & Cardiff University
  • Katowice, Poland Department of Cardiology Medical University of Silesia
  • Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
  • UniversitätsSpital Zürich Zürich Switzerland
  • Heart Sector, Hygeia Hospitals Group Athens Greece
  • Istituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione
  • Faculty of Medicine, Serbian Academy of Science and Arts Belgrade University Belgrade Serbia
  • Dept of Cardiology Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, and University of Oslo Oslo Norway
  • Antwerp University and Antwerp University Hospital Antwerp Belgium

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

145   Link opens in a new tab Citations (SciVal)
45 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and reduces all‐cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two‐thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post implantation follow‐up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three ESC Associations, HFA, EHRA and EACVI focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post‐procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains; (I) overcoming CRT under‐utilization, (II) better understanding of pre‐implant characteristics, (III) abandoning the term ‘non‐response’ and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (IV) implementing a dedicated post‐implant CRT care pathway.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2349-2369
Number of pages21
JournalEuropean Journal of Heart Failure
Volume22
Issue number12
Early online date2 Nov 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Mullens, W., Auricchio, A., Martens, P., Witte, K., Cowie, M.R., Delgado, V., Dickstein, K., Linde, C., Vernooy, K., Leyva, F., Bauersachs, J., Israel, C.W., Lund, L., Donal, E., Boriani, G., Jaarsma, T., Berruezo, A., Traykov, V., Yousef, Z., Kalarus, Z., Nielsen, J.C., Steffel, J., Vardas, P., Coats, A., Seferovic, P., Edvardsen, T., Heidbuchel, H., Ruschitzka, F. and Leclercq, C. (2020), Optimized Implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy – a call for action for referral and optimization of care. Eur J Heart Fail. Accepted Author Manuscript., which has been published in final form at https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2046.  This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance With Wiley Terms and Conditions for self-archiving.

Keywords

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimized Implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this