Participation, Organization, and Social Cohesion

John Child*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

There is a demand for the extension of participation in organizational decision-making. If realized, this should strengthen the stability of a democratic society through providing more people with a meaningful experience of democratic processes. At the same time, however, organizations are continuing to become bigger and their control more centralized. This trend is illustrated for Britain. It leads to an increasing remoteness of decision making on policy issues away from employees and members of the public. The effects of bureaucratization, which accompanies growth, exacerbate the remoteness. So far as participation is concerned, a growing contradiction is therefore emerging between social ideology and social reality, and this is not being given adequate recognition. The likely result is a weakening commitment to collective social objectives and a declining perceived legitimacy of social institutions. It is concluded that a resolution of this problem would be assisted by recognizing how the economic advantages of large-scale organization have been exaggerated and how there are organizational design possibilities for avoiding the socially less desirable aspects of bureaucracy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-451
Number of pages23
JournalHuman Relations
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1976

Fingerprint

social cohesion
bureaucratization
decision making
organization
participation
social reality
social institution
Decision making
bureaucracy
legitimacy
ideology
employee
commitment
demand
trend
Personnel
economics
Economics
experience
Participation

Cite this

Child, John. / Participation, Organization, and Social Cohesion. In: Human Relations. 1976 ; Vol. 29, No. 5. pp. 429-451.
@article{d7eab2baa4a547cca5a5a33437313478,
title = "Participation, Organization, and Social Cohesion",
abstract = "There is a demand for the extension of participation in organizational decision-making. If realized, this should strengthen the stability of a democratic society through providing more people with a meaningful experience of democratic processes. At the same time, however, organizations are continuing to become bigger and their control more centralized. This trend is illustrated for Britain. It leads to an increasing remoteness of decision making on policy issues away from employees and members of the public. The effects of bureaucratization, which accompanies growth, exacerbate the remoteness. So far as participation is concerned, a growing contradiction is therefore emerging between social ideology and social reality, and this is not being given adequate recognition. The likely result is a weakening commitment to collective social objectives and a declining perceived legitimacy of social institutions. It is concluded that a resolution of this problem would be assisted by recognizing how the economic advantages of large-scale organization have been exaggerated and how there are organizational design possibilities for avoiding the socially less desirable aspects of bureaucracy.",
author = "John Child",
year = "1976",
doi = "10.1177/001872677602900504",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "429--451",
journal = "Human Relations",
issn = "0018-7267",
publisher = "SAGE",
number = "5",

}

Participation, Organization, and Social Cohesion. / Child, John.

In: Human Relations, Vol. 29, No. 5, 1976, p. 429-451.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Participation, Organization, and Social Cohesion

AU - Child, John

PY - 1976

Y1 - 1976

N2 - There is a demand for the extension of participation in organizational decision-making. If realized, this should strengthen the stability of a democratic society through providing more people with a meaningful experience of democratic processes. At the same time, however, organizations are continuing to become bigger and their control more centralized. This trend is illustrated for Britain. It leads to an increasing remoteness of decision making on policy issues away from employees and members of the public. The effects of bureaucratization, which accompanies growth, exacerbate the remoteness. So far as participation is concerned, a growing contradiction is therefore emerging between social ideology and social reality, and this is not being given adequate recognition. The likely result is a weakening commitment to collective social objectives and a declining perceived legitimacy of social institutions. It is concluded that a resolution of this problem would be assisted by recognizing how the economic advantages of large-scale organization have been exaggerated and how there are organizational design possibilities for avoiding the socially less desirable aspects of bureaucracy.

AB - There is a demand for the extension of participation in organizational decision-making. If realized, this should strengthen the stability of a democratic society through providing more people with a meaningful experience of democratic processes. At the same time, however, organizations are continuing to become bigger and their control more centralized. This trend is illustrated for Britain. It leads to an increasing remoteness of decision making on policy issues away from employees and members of the public. The effects of bureaucratization, which accompanies growth, exacerbate the remoteness. So far as participation is concerned, a growing contradiction is therefore emerging between social ideology and social reality, and this is not being given adequate recognition. The likely result is a weakening commitment to collective social objectives and a declining perceived legitimacy of social institutions. It is concluded that a resolution of this problem would be assisted by recognizing how the economic advantages of large-scale organization have been exaggerated and how there are organizational design possibilities for avoiding the socially less desirable aspects of bureaucracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964134078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001872677602900504

DO - 10.1177/001872677602900504

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84964134078

VL - 29

SP - 429

EP - 451

JO - Human Relations

JF - Human Relations

SN - 0018-7267

IS - 5

ER -