Patients' and physicians' experiences of atrial fibrillation consultations and anticoagulation decision-making: a multi-perspective IPA design

Christian Borg Xuereb, Rachel L. Shaw, Deirdre A. Lane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' and physicians' experiences of atrial fibrillation consultations and oral anticoagulation decision-making.

DESIGN: Multi-perspective interpretative phenomenological analyses.

METHODS: Participants included small homogeneous subgroups: AF patients who accepted (n=4), refused (n=4), or discontinued (n=3) warfarin, and four physician subgroups (n=4 each group): consultant cardiologists, consultant general physicians, general practitioners and cardiology registrars. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Transcripts were analysed using multi-perspective IPA analyses to attend to individuals within subgroups and making comparisons within and between groups.

RESULTS: Three themes represented patients' experiences: Positioning within the physician-patient dyad, Health-life balance, and Drug myths and fear of stroke. Physicians' accounts generated three themes: Mechanised metaphors and probabilities, Navigating toward the 'right' decision, and Negotiating systemic factors.

CONCLUSIONS: This multi-perspective IPA design facilitated an understanding of the diagnostic consultation and treatment decision-making which foregrounded patients' and physicians' experiences. We drew on Habermas' theory of communicative action to recommend broadening the content within consultations and shifting the focus to patients' life contexts. Interventions including specialist multidisciplinary teams, flexible management in primary care, and multifaceted interventions for information provision may enable the creation of an environment that supports genuine patient involvement and participatory decision-making.

LanguageEnglish
Pages436-455
Number of pages20
JournalPsychology and Health
Volume31
Issue number4
Early online date21 Nov 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Fingerprint

Atrial Fibrillation
Decision Making
Referral and Consultation
Physicians
Consultants
Patient Positioning
Patient Participation
Metaphor
Negotiating
Warfarin
Cardiology
General Practitioners
Fear
Primary Health Care
Stroke
Interviews
Health
Pharmaceutical Preparations

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychology & Health on 21/12/15, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08870446.2015.1116534

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • decision-making
  • interpretative phenomenological analysis
  • medication adherence
  • oral anticoagulation
  • qualitative research

Cite this

@article{cc2775cc64b24c31bb8fbdabbbb6f873,
title = "Patients' and physicians' experiences of atrial fibrillation consultations and anticoagulation decision-making: a multi-perspective IPA design",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' and physicians' experiences of atrial fibrillation consultations and oral anticoagulation decision-making.DESIGN: Multi-perspective interpretative phenomenological analyses.METHODS: Participants included small homogeneous subgroups: AF patients who accepted (n=4), refused (n=4), or discontinued (n=3) warfarin, and four physician subgroups (n=4 each group): consultant cardiologists, consultant general physicians, general practitioners and cardiology registrars. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Transcripts were analysed using multi-perspective IPA analyses to attend to individuals within subgroups and making comparisons within and between groups.RESULTS: Three themes represented patients' experiences: Positioning within the physician-patient dyad, Health-life balance, and Drug myths and fear of stroke. Physicians' accounts generated three themes: Mechanised metaphors and probabilities, Navigating toward the 'right' decision, and Negotiating systemic factors.CONCLUSIONS: This multi-perspective IPA design facilitated an understanding of the diagnostic consultation and treatment decision-making which foregrounded patients' and physicians' experiences. We drew on Habermas' theory of communicative action to recommend broadening the content within consultations and shifting the focus to patients' life contexts. Interventions including specialist multidisciplinary teams, flexible management in primary care, and multifaceted interventions for information provision may enable the creation of an environment that supports genuine patient involvement and participatory decision-making.",
keywords = "atrial fibrillation, decision-making, interpretative phenomenological analysis, medication adherence, oral anticoagulation, qualitative research",
author = "{Borg Xuereb}, Christian and Shaw, {Rachel L.} and Lane, {Deirdre A.}",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychology & Health on 21/12/15, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08870446.2015.1116534",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1080/08870446.2015.1116534",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "436--455",
journal = "Psychology and Health",
issn = "0887-0446",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "4",

}

Patients' and physicians' experiences of atrial fibrillation consultations and anticoagulation decision-making : a multi-perspective IPA design. / Borg Xuereb, Christian; Shaw, Rachel L.; Lane, Deirdre A.

In: Psychology and Health, Vol. 31, No. 4, 2016, p. 436-455.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patients' and physicians' experiences of atrial fibrillation consultations and anticoagulation decision-making

T2 - Psychology and Health

AU - Borg Xuereb, Christian

AU - Shaw, Rachel L.

AU - Lane, Deirdre A.

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Psychology & Health on 21/12/15, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/08870446.2015.1116534

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' and physicians' experiences of atrial fibrillation consultations and oral anticoagulation decision-making.DESIGN: Multi-perspective interpretative phenomenological analyses.METHODS: Participants included small homogeneous subgroups: AF patients who accepted (n=4), refused (n=4), or discontinued (n=3) warfarin, and four physician subgroups (n=4 each group): consultant cardiologists, consultant general physicians, general practitioners and cardiology registrars. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Transcripts were analysed using multi-perspective IPA analyses to attend to individuals within subgroups and making comparisons within and between groups.RESULTS: Three themes represented patients' experiences: Positioning within the physician-patient dyad, Health-life balance, and Drug myths and fear of stroke. Physicians' accounts generated three themes: Mechanised metaphors and probabilities, Navigating toward the 'right' decision, and Negotiating systemic factors.CONCLUSIONS: This multi-perspective IPA design facilitated an understanding of the diagnostic consultation and treatment decision-making which foregrounded patients' and physicians' experiences. We drew on Habermas' theory of communicative action to recommend broadening the content within consultations and shifting the focus to patients' life contexts. Interventions including specialist multidisciplinary teams, flexible management in primary care, and multifaceted interventions for information provision may enable the creation of an environment that supports genuine patient involvement and participatory decision-making.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' and physicians' experiences of atrial fibrillation consultations and oral anticoagulation decision-making.DESIGN: Multi-perspective interpretative phenomenological analyses.METHODS: Participants included small homogeneous subgroups: AF patients who accepted (n=4), refused (n=4), or discontinued (n=3) warfarin, and four physician subgroups (n=4 each group): consultant cardiologists, consultant general physicians, general practitioners and cardiology registrars. Semi-structured interviews were conducted. Transcripts were analysed using multi-perspective IPA analyses to attend to individuals within subgroups and making comparisons within and between groups.RESULTS: Three themes represented patients' experiences: Positioning within the physician-patient dyad, Health-life balance, and Drug myths and fear of stroke. Physicians' accounts generated three themes: Mechanised metaphors and probabilities, Navigating toward the 'right' decision, and Negotiating systemic factors.CONCLUSIONS: This multi-perspective IPA design facilitated an understanding of the diagnostic consultation and treatment decision-making which foregrounded patients' and physicians' experiences. We drew on Habermas' theory of communicative action to recommend broadening the content within consultations and shifting the focus to patients' life contexts. Interventions including specialist multidisciplinary teams, flexible management in primary care, and multifaceted interventions for information provision may enable the creation of an environment that supports genuine patient involvement and participatory decision-making.

KW - atrial fibrillation

KW - decision-making

KW - interpretative phenomenological analysis

KW - medication adherence

KW - oral anticoagulation

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84959251889&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/08870446.2015.1116534

DO - 10.1080/08870446.2015.1116534

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 436

EP - 455

JO - Psychology and Health

JF - Psychology and Health

SN - 0887-0446

IS - 4

ER -