Abstract
This study examines the relative effectiveness of the UK government’s public health messages used during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We focus on the use of a loss versus gain frame. We look at the effect of framing on behavioural inclination to follow COVID-19 guidance, as well as affective mechanisms and individual characteristic moderators that might explain said willingness. We ran two studies with a voluntary sample of the UK adult population (total n = 300). Across both studies, we only find a significant impact of message framing on the level of negative affect triggered, with the loss frame triggering a higher negative affect. Instead, attitude to public health communication had a direct and indirect effect on behavioural inclination. Our results suggest that threat minimisation and satisfaction with authorities handling a health crisis might be key to consider when developing effective public health communications.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 30 |
Number of pages | 29 |
Journal | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health |
Volume | 22 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 29 Dec 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Copyright © 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Keywords
- Adult
- COVID-19/psychology
- Female
- Health Communication/methods
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Pandemics
- Persuasive Communication
- Public Health
- SARS-CoV-2
- United Kingdom
- Young Adult