Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex

Cordelia Fine, Rebecca Jordan-Young, Anelis Kaiser*, Gina Rippon

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Why is popular understanding of female-male differences still based on rigid models of development, even though contemporary developmental sciences emphasize plasticity? Is it because the science of sex differences still works from the same rigid models?
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)550-551
Number of pages2
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume17
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in cognitive sciences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fine, C, Jordan-Young, R, Kaiser, A & Rippon, G, 'Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex' Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 17, no. 11 (2013) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this