Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex

Cordelia Fine, Rebecca Jordan-Young, Anelis Kaiser, Gina Rippon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Why is popular understanding of female-male differences still based on rigid models of development, even though contemporary developmental sciences emphasize plasticity? Is it because the science of sex differences still works from the same rigid models?
LanguageEnglish
Pages550-551
Number of pages2
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume17
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Nov 2013

Fingerprint

Sex Characteristics

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in cognitive sciences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fine, C, Jordan-Young, R, Kaiser, A & Rippon, G, 'Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex' Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 17, no. 11 (2013) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

Cite this

Fine, Cordelia ; Jordan-Young, Rebecca ; Kaiser, Anelis ; Rippon, Gina. / Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex. In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 2013 ; Vol. 17, No. 11. pp. 550-551.
@article{7feeb82d8b8d4775940533ae674e0bbf,
title = "Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex",
abstract = "Why is popular understanding of female-male differences still based on rigid models of development, even though contemporary developmental sciences emphasize plasticity? Is it because the science of sex differences still works from the same rigid models?",
author = "Cordelia Fine and Rebecca Jordan-Young and Anelis Kaiser and Gina Rippon",
note = "NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in cognitive sciences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fine, C, Jordan-Young, R, Kaiser, A & Rippon, G, 'Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex' Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 17, no. 11 (2013) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010",
year = "2013",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "550--551",
journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",
issn = "1364-6613",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "11",

}

Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex. / Fine, Cordelia; Jordan-Young, Rebecca; Kaiser, Anelis; Rippon, Gina.

In: Trends in Cognitive Sciences, Vol. 17, No. 11, 11.2013, p. 550-551.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex

AU - Fine, Cordelia

AU - Jordan-Young, Rebecca

AU - Kaiser, Anelis

AU - Rippon, Gina

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in cognitive sciences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fine, C, Jordan-Young, R, Kaiser, A & Rippon, G, 'Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex' Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 17, no. 11 (2013) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Why is popular understanding of female-male differences still based on rigid models of development, even though contemporary developmental sciences emphasize plasticity? Is it because the science of sex differences still works from the same rigid models?

AB - Why is popular understanding of female-male differences still based on rigid models of development, even though contemporary developmental sciences emphasize plasticity? Is it because the science of sex differences still works from the same rigid models?

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886627380&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 550

EP - 551

JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

T2 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

SN - 1364-6613

IS - 11

ER -