Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex

Cordelia Fine; Rebecca Jordan-Young; Anelis Kaiser; Gina Rippon

doi:10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex

Cordelia Fine
, Rebecca Jordan-Young
, Anelis Kaiser^*
, Gina Rippon

^*Corresponding author for this work

University of Melbourne
Columbia University
Universität Bern

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

61 Citations (SciVal)

637 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Why is popular understanding of female-male differences still based on rigid models of development, even though contemporary developmental sciences emphasize plasticity? Is it because the science of sex differences still works from the same rigid models?

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	550-551
Number of pages	2
Journal	Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume	17
Issue number	11
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010
Publication status	Published - Nov 2013

Bibliographical note

NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in cognitive sciences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fine, C, Jordan-Young, R, Kaiser, A & Rippon, G, 'Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex' Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 17, no. 11 (2013) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

Access to Document

10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex
NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in cognitive sciences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fine, C, Jordan-Young, R, Kaiser, A & Rippon, G, 'Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex' Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 17, no. 11 (2013) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010
Accepted author manuscript, 113 KB

Cite this

@article{7feeb82d8b8d4775940533ae674e0bbf,

title = "Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex",

abstract = "Why is popular understanding of female-male differences still based on rigid models of development, even though contemporary developmental sciences emphasize plasticity? Is it because the science of sex differences still works from the same rigid models?",

author = "Cordelia Fine and Rebecca Jordan-Young and Anelis Kaiser and Gina Rippon",

note = "NOTICE: this is the author{\textquoteright}s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in cognitive sciences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fine, C, Jordan-Young, R, Kaiser, A \& Rippon, G, 'Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex' Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 17, no. 11 (2013) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010",

year = "2013",

month = nov,

doi = "10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010",

language = "English",

volume = "17",

pages = "550--551",

journal = "Trends in Cognitive Sciences",

issn = "1364-6613",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "11",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex

AU - Fine, Cordelia

AU - Jordan-Young, Rebecca

AU - Kaiser, Anelis

AU - Rippon, Gina

N1 - NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Trends in cognitive sciences. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Fine, C, Jordan-Young, R, Kaiser, A & Rippon, G, 'Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity…and the rigid problem of sex' Trends in cognitive sciences, vol. 17, no. 11 (2013) DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

PY - 2013/11

Y1 - 2013/11

N2 - Why is popular understanding of female-male differences still based on rigid models of development, even though contemporary developmental sciences emphasize plasticity? Is it because the science of sex differences still works from the same rigid models?

AB - Why is popular understanding of female-male differences still based on rigid models of development, even though contemporary developmental sciences emphasize plasticity? Is it because the science of sex differences still works from the same rigid models?

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84886627380

U2 - 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

DO - 10.1016/j.tics.2013.08.010

M3 - Article

C2 - 24176517

SN - 1364-6613

VL - 17

SP - 550

EP - 551

JO - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

JF - Trends in Cognitive Sciences

IS - 11

ER -

Plasticity, plasticity, plasticity . . . and the rigid problem of sex

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this