Pleasure, pain and procrastination: reflections on the experience of doing memory-work research

Nollaig A. Frost, Virginia Eatough, Rachel Shaw, Katie L. Weille, Effy Tzemou, Lisa Baraitser

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The focus of this article is the process of doing memory-work research. We tell the story of our experience of what it was like to use this approach. We were enthused to work collectively on a "discovery" project to explore a method with which we were unfamiliar. We hoped to build working relationships based on mutual respect and the desire to focus on methodology and its place in our psychological understanding. The empirical activities highlighted methodological and experiential challenges, which tested our adherence to the social constructionist premise of Haug's original description of memory work. Combined with practical difficulties of living across Europe, writing and analyzing the memories became contentious. We found ourselves having to address a number of tensions emanating from the work and our approach to it. We discuss some of these tensions alongside examples that illustrate the research process and the ways we negotiated the collective nature of the memory-work approach.

LanguageEnglish
Pages231-248
Number of pages18
JournalQualitative Research in Psychology
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 14 May 2012

Fingerprint

Pleasure
Pain
Research
Psychology

Bibliographical note

This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Frost, N. A., Eatough, V., Shaw, R., Weille, K. L., Tzemou, E., & Baraitser, L. (2012). Pleasure, pain and procrastination: reflections on the experience of doing memory-work research. Qualitative research in psychology, 9(3), 231-248. Qualitative research in psychology 2012 © 2012 Crown Copyright. Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14780887.2010.500355

Keywords

  • faith
  • feminism
  • memory
  • memory work
  • qualitative research
  • reflection

Cite this

Frost, Nollaig A. ; Eatough, Virginia ; Shaw, Rachel ; Weille, Katie L. ; Tzemou, Effy ; Baraitser, Lisa. / Pleasure, pain and procrastination : reflections on the experience of doing memory-work research. In: Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2012 ; Vol. 9, No. 3. pp. 231-248.
@article{01a82f33633a4b74b7d4d5c71b1c8060,
title = "Pleasure, pain and procrastination: reflections on the experience of doing memory-work research",
abstract = "The focus of this article is the process of doing memory-work research. We tell the story of our experience of what it was like to use this approach. We were enthused to work collectively on a {"}discovery{"} project to explore a method with which we were unfamiliar. We hoped to build working relationships based on mutual respect and the desire to focus on methodology and its place in our psychological understanding. The empirical activities highlighted methodological and experiential challenges, which tested our adherence to the social constructionist premise of Haug's original description of memory work. Combined with practical difficulties of living across Europe, writing and analyzing the memories became contentious. We found ourselves having to address a number of tensions emanating from the work and our approach to it. We discuss some of these tensions alongside examples that illustrate the research process and the ways we negotiated the collective nature of the memory-work approach.",
keywords = "faith, feminism, memory, memory work, qualitative research, reflection",
author = "Frost, {Nollaig A.} and Virginia Eatough and Rachel Shaw and Weille, {Katie L.} and Effy Tzemou and Lisa Baraitser",
note = "This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Frost, N. A., Eatough, V., Shaw, R., Weille, K. L., Tzemou, E., & Baraitser, L. (2012). Pleasure, pain and procrastination: reflections on the experience of doing memory-work research. Qualitative research in psychology, 9(3), 231-248. Qualitative research in psychology 2012 {\circledC} 2012 Crown Copyright. Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14780887.2010.500355",
year = "2012",
month = "5",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1080/14780887.2010.500355",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "231--248",
journal = "Qualitative Research in Psychology",
issn = "1478-0887",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Pleasure, pain and procrastination : reflections on the experience of doing memory-work research. / Frost, Nollaig A.; Eatough, Virginia; Shaw, Rachel; Weille, Katie L.; Tzemou, Effy; Baraitser, Lisa.

In: Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 3, 14.05.2012, p. 231-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pleasure, pain and procrastination

T2 - Qualitative Research in Psychology

AU - Frost, Nollaig A.

AU - Eatough, Virginia

AU - Shaw, Rachel

AU - Weille, Katie L.

AU - Tzemou, Effy

AU - Baraitser, Lisa

N1 - This is an Author's Accepted Manuscript of an article published in Frost, N. A., Eatough, V., Shaw, R., Weille, K. L., Tzemou, E., & Baraitser, L. (2012). Pleasure, pain and procrastination: reflections on the experience of doing memory-work research. Qualitative research in psychology, 9(3), 231-248. Qualitative research in psychology 2012 © 2012 Crown Copyright. Taylor & Francis, available online at: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14780887.2010.500355

PY - 2012/5/14

Y1 - 2012/5/14

N2 - The focus of this article is the process of doing memory-work research. We tell the story of our experience of what it was like to use this approach. We were enthused to work collectively on a "discovery" project to explore a method with which we were unfamiliar. We hoped to build working relationships based on mutual respect and the desire to focus on methodology and its place in our psychological understanding. The empirical activities highlighted methodological and experiential challenges, which tested our adherence to the social constructionist premise of Haug's original description of memory work. Combined with practical difficulties of living across Europe, writing and analyzing the memories became contentious. We found ourselves having to address a number of tensions emanating from the work and our approach to it. We discuss some of these tensions alongside examples that illustrate the research process and the ways we negotiated the collective nature of the memory-work approach.

AB - The focus of this article is the process of doing memory-work research. We tell the story of our experience of what it was like to use this approach. We were enthused to work collectively on a "discovery" project to explore a method with which we were unfamiliar. We hoped to build working relationships based on mutual respect and the desire to focus on methodology and its place in our psychological understanding. The empirical activities highlighted methodological and experiential challenges, which tested our adherence to the social constructionist premise of Haug's original description of memory work. Combined with practical difficulties of living across Europe, writing and analyzing the memories became contentious. We found ourselves having to address a number of tensions emanating from the work and our approach to it. We discuss some of these tensions alongside examples that illustrate the research process and the ways we negotiated the collective nature of the memory-work approach.

KW - faith

KW - feminism

KW - memory

KW - memory work

KW - qualitative research

KW - reflection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84861589980&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14780887.2010.500355

DO - 10.1080/14780887.2010.500355

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 231

EP - 248

JO - Qualitative Research in Psychology

JF - Qualitative Research in Psychology

SN - 1478-0887

IS - 3

ER -