Abstract
In developing neural network techniques for real world applications it is still very rare to see estimates of confidence placed on the neural network predictions. This is a major deficiency, especially in safety-critical systems.
In this paper we explore three distinct methods of producing point-wise confidence intervals using neural networks. We compare and contrast Bayesian, Gaussian Process and Predictive error bars evaluated on real data.
The problem domain is concerned with the calibration of a real automotive engine management system for both air-fuel ratio determination and on-line ignition timing. This problem requires real-time control and is a good candidate for exploring the use of confidence predictions due to its safety-critical nature.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 77-85 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Neural Computing and Applications |
Volume | 8 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 1999 |
Bibliographical note
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comKeywords
- neural network
- safety-critical systems
- Gaussian Process
- Predictive error
- automotive engine management