Abstract
In developing neural network techniques for real world applications it is still very rare to see estimates of confidence placed on the neural network predictions. This is a major deficiency, especially in safety-critical systems.
In this paper we explore three distinct methods of producing point-wise confidence intervals using neural networks. We compare and contrast Bayesian, Gaussian Process and Predictive error bars evaluated on real data.
The problem domain is concerned with the calibration of a real automotive engine management system for both air-fuel ratio determination and on-line ignition timing. This problem requires real-time control and is a good candidate for exploring the use of confidence predictions due to its safety-critical nature.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 77-85 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Neural Computing and Applications |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Mar 1999 |
Bibliographical note
The original publication is available at www.springerlink.comKeywords
- neural network
- safety-critical systems
- Gaussian Process
- Predictive error
- automotive engine management
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Point-wise confidence interval estimation by neural networks: A comparative study based on automotive engine calibration.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver