Pooling strategies for the integration of orientation signals depend on their spatial configuration

A.S. Baldwin, J.S. Husk, T.S. Meese, R.F. Hess

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

Abstract

The visual system combines samples from the retinal image into representations of spatially extensive textures. Local orientation signals can be pooled over a texture to estimate global orientation, with psychophysical performance improving as a function of signal area. We used a novel stimulus to investigate how orientation signals are combined over space (whether observers could ignore signalsfrom irrelevant locations), and the effect of spatial configuration on this pooling. Stimuli were 24×24 element arrays of 4c/deg log-Gabors, spaced 1 degree apart. A proportion of these elements had a coherent orientation (horizontal/vertical), with the remainder assigned random orientations.The observer’s task was to identify the global orientation. The spatial configuration of the signal was modulated by a checkerboard-like pattern of square checks containing either potential signal elements or only irrelevant noise. The distribution of signal elements within the array was manipulated by varying the size and location of these checks within a fixed-diameter stimulus. A blocked staircase procedure found the threshold coherence for identification. An ideal detector would pool over just the relevant locations (vector-averaging and filter-maxing models make identical predictions for these signal combination effects), however humans only did this for medium (5×5 to 9×9) check sizes, and for large (15×15) check sizes when the signal was placed at the fovea. For small (1×1 to 3×3) check sizes and large (15×15) peripheral checks the pooling occurred indiscriminately over relevant and irrelevant locations. These findings suggest orientation signals are combined mandatorily over short ranges and in the periphery, but flexibly otherwise.
Original languageEnglish
Article number3
Pages (from-to)1512-1513
Number of pages2
JournalPerception
Volume41
Issue number12
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2012
EventAVA Christmas Meeting - London, United Kingdom
Duration: 18 Dec 2012 → …

Fingerprint

Noise
Textures
Detectors

Bibliographical note

Abstracts.

Cite this

Baldwin, A.S. ; Husk, J.S. ; Meese, T.S. ; Hess, R.F. / Pooling strategies for the integration of orientation signals depend on their spatial configuration. In: Perception. 2012 ; Vol. 41, No. 12. pp. 1512-1513.
@article{119ab178fbbc4bc0a0ffffbfe41fe3c9,
title = "Pooling strategies for the integration of orientation signals depend on their spatial configuration",
abstract = "The visual system combines samples from the retinal image into representations of spatially extensive textures. Local orientation signals can be pooled over a texture to estimate global orientation, with psychophysical performance improving as a function of signal area. We used a novel stimulus to investigate how orientation signals are combined over space (whether observers could ignore signalsfrom irrelevant locations), and the effect of spatial configuration on this pooling. Stimuli were 24×24 element arrays of 4c/deg log-Gabors, spaced 1 degree apart. A proportion of these elements had a coherent orientation (horizontal/vertical), with the remainder assigned random orientations.The observer’s task was to identify the global orientation. The spatial configuration of the signal was modulated by a checkerboard-like pattern of square checks containing either potential signal elements or only irrelevant noise. The distribution of signal elements within the array was manipulated by varying the size and location of these checks within a fixed-diameter stimulus. A blocked staircase procedure found the threshold coherence for identification. An ideal detector would pool over just the relevant locations (vector-averaging and filter-maxing models make identical predictions for these signal combination effects), however humans only did this for medium (5×5 to 9×9) check sizes, and for large (15×15) check sizes when the signal was placed at the fovea. For small (1×1 to 3×3) check sizes and large (15×15) peripheral checks the pooling occurred indiscriminately over relevant and irrelevant locations. These findings suggest orientation signals are combined mandatorily over short ranges and in the periphery, but flexibly otherwise.",
author = "A.S. Baldwin and J.S. Husk and T.S. Meese and R.F. Hess",
note = "Abstracts.",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1512--1513",
journal = "Perception",
issn = "0301-0066",
publisher = "Pion Ltd.",
number = "12",

}

Pooling strategies for the integration of orientation signals depend on their spatial configuration. / Baldwin, A.S.; Husk, J.S.; Meese, T.S.; Hess, R.F.

In: Perception, Vol. 41, No. 12, 3, 12.2012, p. 1512-1513.

Research output: Contribution to journalMeeting abstract

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pooling strategies for the integration of orientation signals depend on their spatial configuration

AU - Baldwin, A.S.

AU - Husk, J.S.

AU - Meese, T.S.

AU - Hess, R.F.

N1 - Abstracts.

PY - 2012/12

Y1 - 2012/12

N2 - The visual system combines samples from the retinal image into representations of spatially extensive textures. Local orientation signals can be pooled over a texture to estimate global orientation, with psychophysical performance improving as a function of signal area. We used a novel stimulus to investigate how orientation signals are combined over space (whether observers could ignore signalsfrom irrelevant locations), and the effect of spatial configuration on this pooling. Stimuli were 24×24 element arrays of 4c/deg log-Gabors, spaced 1 degree apart. A proportion of these elements had a coherent orientation (horizontal/vertical), with the remainder assigned random orientations.The observer’s task was to identify the global orientation. The spatial configuration of the signal was modulated by a checkerboard-like pattern of square checks containing either potential signal elements or only irrelevant noise. The distribution of signal elements within the array was manipulated by varying the size and location of these checks within a fixed-diameter stimulus. A blocked staircase procedure found the threshold coherence for identification. An ideal detector would pool over just the relevant locations (vector-averaging and filter-maxing models make identical predictions for these signal combination effects), however humans only did this for medium (5×5 to 9×9) check sizes, and for large (15×15) check sizes when the signal was placed at the fovea. For small (1×1 to 3×3) check sizes and large (15×15) peripheral checks the pooling occurred indiscriminately over relevant and irrelevant locations. These findings suggest orientation signals are combined mandatorily over short ranges and in the periphery, but flexibly otherwise.

AB - The visual system combines samples from the retinal image into representations of spatially extensive textures. Local orientation signals can be pooled over a texture to estimate global orientation, with psychophysical performance improving as a function of signal area. We used a novel stimulus to investigate how orientation signals are combined over space (whether observers could ignore signalsfrom irrelevant locations), and the effect of spatial configuration on this pooling. Stimuli were 24×24 element arrays of 4c/deg log-Gabors, spaced 1 degree apart. A proportion of these elements had a coherent orientation (horizontal/vertical), with the remainder assigned random orientations.The observer’s task was to identify the global orientation. The spatial configuration of the signal was modulated by a checkerboard-like pattern of square checks containing either potential signal elements or only irrelevant noise. The distribution of signal elements within the array was manipulated by varying the size and location of these checks within a fixed-diameter stimulus. A blocked staircase procedure found the threshold coherence for identification. An ideal detector would pool over just the relevant locations (vector-averaging and filter-maxing models make identical predictions for these signal combination effects), however humans only did this for medium (5×5 to 9×9) check sizes, and for large (15×15) check sizes when the signal was placed at the fovea. For small (1×1 to 3×3) check sizes and large (15×15) peripheral checks the pooling occurred indiscriminately over relevant and irrelevant locations. These findings suggest orientation signals are combined mandatorily over short ranges and in the periphery, but flexibly otherwise.

UR - http://pec.sagepub.com/content/41/12/1512

M3 - Meeting abstract

VL - 41

SP - 1512

EP - 1513

JO - Perception

JF - Perception

SN - 0301-0066

IS - 12

M1 - 3

ER -