Predicting dyslexia using prereading skills: the role of sensorimotor and cognitive abilities

Julia M. Carroll, Jonathan Solity, Laura R. Shapiro

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: It is well established that phonological awareness, print knowledge and rapid naming predict later reading difficulties. However, additional auditory, visual and motor difficulties have also been observed in dyslexic
children. It is examined to what extent these difficulties can be used to predict later literacy difficulties. Method: An unselected sample of 267 children at school entry completed a wide battery of tasks associated with dyslexia. Their
reading was tested 2, 3 and 4 years later and poor readers were identified (n = 42). Logistic regression and multiple case study approaches were used to examine the predictive validity of different tasks. Results: As expected, print
knowledge, verbal short-term memory, phonological awareness and rapid naming were good predictors of later poor reading. Deficits in visual search and in auditory processing were also present in a large minority of the poor readers.
Almost all poor readers showed deficits in at least one area at school entry, but there was no single deficit that characterised the majority of poor readers. Conclusions: Results are in line with Pennington’s (2006) multiple deficits view of dyslexia. They indicate that the causes of poor reading outcome are multiple, interacting and probabilistic, rather than deterministic. Keywords: Dyslexia; educational attainment; longitudinal studies; prediction; phonological processing.
LanguageEnglish
Pages750–758
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Volume57
Issue number6
Early online date12 Dec 2015
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2016

Fingerprint

Dyslexia
Aptitude
Reading
Short-Term Memory
Longitudinal Studies
Logistic Models

Bibliographical note

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.

Funding: ESRC (RES-000-22-1401); Leverhulme Trust; and the British Academy

Keywords

  • dyslexia
  • educational attainment
  • longitudinal studies
  • prediction
  • phonological processing

Cite this

@article{7e5ec0cdf5a44758b41eef6ae4b78067,
title = "Predicting dyslexia using prereading skills: the role of sensorimotor and cognitive abilities",
abstract = "Background: It is well established that phonological awareness, print knowledge and rapid naming predict later reading difficulties. However, additional auditory, visual and motor difficulties have also been observed in dyslexicchildren. It is examined to what extent these difficulties can be used to predict later literacy difficulties. Method: An unselected sample of 267 children at school entry completed a wide battery of tasks associated with dyslexia. Theirreading was tested 2, 3 and 4 years later and poor readers were identified (n = 42). Logistic regression and multiple case study approaches were used to examine the predictive validity of different tasks. Results: As expected, printknowledge, verbal short-term memory, phonological awareness and rapid naming were good predictors of later poor reading. Deficits in visual search and in auditory processing were also present in a large minority of the poor readers.Almost all poor readers showed deficits in at least one area at school entry, but there was no single deficit that characterised the majority of poor readers. Conclusions: Results are in line with Pennington’s (2006) multiple deficits view of dyslexia. They indicate that the causes of poor reading outcome are multiple, interacting and probabilistic, rather than deterministic. Keywords: Dyslexia; educational attainment; longitudinal studies; prediction; phonological processing.",
keywords = "dyslexia, educational attainment, longitudinal studies, prediction, phonological processing",
author = "Carroll, {Julia M.} and Jonathan Solity and Shapiro, {Laura R.}",
note = "This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. Funding: ESRC (RES-000-22-1401); Leverhulme Trust; and the British Academy",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1111/jcpp.12488",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "750–758",
journal = "Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry",
issn = "0021-9630",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

Predicting dyslexia using prereading skills : the role of sensorimotor and cognitive abilities. / Carroll, Julia M.; Solity, Jonathan; Shapiro, Laura R.

In: Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Vol. 57, No. 6, 06.2016, p. 750–758.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Predicting dyslexia using prereading skills

T2 - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

AU - Carroll, Julia M.

AU - Solity, Jonathan

AU - Shapiro, Laura R.

N1 - This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. Funding: ESRC (RES-000-22-1401); Leverhulme Trust; and the British Academy

PY - 2016/6

Y1 - 2016/6

N2 - Background: It is well established that phonological awareness, print knowledge and rapid naming predict later reading difficulties. However, additional auditory, visual and motor difficulties have also been observed in dyslexicchildren. It is examined to what extent these difficulties can be used to predict later literacy difficulties. Method: An unselected sample of 267 children at school entry completed a wide battery of tasks associated with dyslexia. Theirreading was tested 2, 3 and 4 years later and poor readers were identified (n = 42). Logistic regression and multiple case study approaches were used to examine the predictive validity of different tasks. Results: As expected, printknowledge, verbal short-term memory, phonological awareness and rapid naming were good predictors of later poor reading. Deficits in visual search and in auditory processing were also present in a large minority of the poor readers.Almost all poor readers showed deficits in at least one area at school entry, but there was no single deficit that characterised the majority of poor readers. Conclusions: Results are in line with Pennington’s (2006) multiple deficits view of dyslexia. They indicate that the causes of poor reading outcome are multiple, interacting and probabilistic, rather than deterministic. Keywords: Dyslexia; educational attainment; longitudinal studies; prediction; phonological processing.

AB - Background: It is well established that phonological awareness, print knowledge and rapid naming predict later reading difficulties. However, additional auditory, visual and motor difficulties have also been observed in dyslexicchildren. It is examined to what extent these difficulties can be used to predict later literacy difficulties. Method: An unselected sample of 267 children at school entry completed a wide battery of tasks associated with dyslexia. Theirreading was tested 2, 3 and 4 years later and poor readers were identified (n = 42). Logistic regression and multiple case study approaches were used to examine the predictive validity of different tasks. Results: As expected, printknowledge, verbal short-term memory, phonological awareness and rapid naming were good predictors of later poor reading. Deficits in visual search and in auditory processing were also present in a large minority of the poor readers.Almost all poor readers showed deficits in at least one area at school entry, but there was no single deficit that characterised the majority of poor readers. Conclusions: Results are in line with Pennington’s (2006) multiple deficits view of dyslexia. They indicate that the causes of poor reading outcome are multiple, interacting and probabilistic, rather than deterministic. Keywords: Dyslexia; educational attainment; longitudinal studies; prediction; phonological processing.

KW - dyslexia

KW - educational attainment

KW - longitudinal studies

KW - prediction

KW - phonological processing

UR - http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpp.12488/abstract

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949969228&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jcpp.12488

DO - 10.1111/jcpp.12488

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 750

EP - 758

JO - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

JF - Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

SN - 0021-9630

IS - 6

ER -