Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies

Richard J. Tunney*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Preference reversals are a well-documented example of suboptimal decision making. Typical preference reversals experiments have involved monetary bets presented in probability format. Research on other examples of decision making have shown that irrational or suboptimal choices are diminished or eliminated entirely when the probabilities are presented as relative frequencies (e.g., Gigerenzer & Hoffrage, 1995). The aim of the present experiment was to determine if the way in which information is presented to participants affects participants' preferences. When the options were presented in the standard probability format 59% of participants' preferences were reversed. However, reversals were significantly decreased in the frequency format group, with only 40% of participants' responses being inconsistent. Although preference reversals were not eliminated when the gambles were presented as frequencies they were significantly diminished and may not be such a robust example of irrational decision making after all.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1516-1523
Number of pages8
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Volume59
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Sep 2006

Fingerprint

Decision Making
Research

Cite this

@article{7cb596086d5744f08b71ab9e1c50c9cc,
title = "Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies",
abstract = "Preference reversals are a well-documented example of suboptimal decision making. Typical preference reversals experiments have involved monetary bets presented in probability format. Research on other examples of decision making have shown that irrational or suboptimal choices are diminished or eliminated entirely when the probabilities are presented as relative frequencies (e.g., Gigerenzer & Hoffrage, 1995). The aim of the present experiment was to determine if the way in which information is presented to participants affects participants' preferences. When the options were presented in the standard probability format 59{\%} of participants' preferences were reversed. However, reversals were significantly decreased in the frequency format group, with only 40{\%} of participants' responses being inconsistent. Although preference reversals were not eliminated when the gambles were presented as frequencies they were significantly diminished and may not be such a robust example of irrational decision making after all.",
author = "Tunney, {Richard J.}",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/17470210600750509",
language = "English",
volume = "59",
pages = "1516--1523",
journal = "Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "1747-0218",
publisher = "Psychology Press",
number = "9",

}

Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies. / Tunney, Richard J.

In: Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 59, No. 9, 01.09.2006, p. 1516-1523.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies

AU - Tunney, Richard J.

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - Preference reversals are a well-documented example of suboptimal decision making. Typical preference reversals experiments have involved monetary bets presented in probability format. Research on other examples of decision making have shown that irrational or suboptimal choices are diminished or eliminated entirely when the probabilities are presented as relative frequencies (e.g., Gigerenzer & Hoffrage, 1995). The aim of the present experiment was to determine if the way in which information is presented to participants affects participants' preferences. When the options were presented in the standard probability format 59% of participants' preferences were reversed. However, reversals were significantly decreased in the frequency format group, with only 40% of participants' responses being inconsistent. Although preference reversals were not eliminated when the gambles were presented as frequencies they were significantly diminished and may not be such a robust example of irrational decision making after all.

AB - Preference reversals are a well-documented example of suboptimal decision making. Typical preference reversals experiments have involved monetary bets presented in probability format. Research on other examples of decision making have shown that irrational or suboptimal choices are diminished or eliminated entirely when the probabilities are presented as relative frequencies (e.g., Gigerenzer & Hoffrage, 1995). The aim of the present experiment was to determine if the way in which information is presented to participants affects participants' preferences. When the options were presented in the standard probability format 59% of participants' preferences were reversed. However, reversals were significantly decreased in the frequency format group, with only 40% of participants' responses being inconsistent. Although preference reversals were not eliminated when the gambles were presented as frequencies they were significantly diminished and may not be such a robust example of irrational decision making after all.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33746843722&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470210600750509

U2 - 10.1080/17470210600750509

DO - 10.1080/17470210600750509

M3 - Article

C2 - 16873105

AN - SCOPUS:33746843722

VL - 59

SP - 1516

EP - 1523

JO - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 1747-0218

IS - 9

ER -